Was Taylor Ring Mag p4p Number one?

[Parody]

Someone got

[GunStar]

I feel bad for Miksterious owning himself like that.

[.Mik.]

Do me a favour guys.

Exactly how does getting one Magazine statistic wrong in an argument where it is utterly negligible and insignificant lead in ANYWAY whatsoever to having 'no boxing knowledge'. TS only picks up on that one point because he realises that the rest of his argument is ridiculously pap and is trying to salvage whatever small win he can get from the situation.

[Steelhammer86]

I think he meant Taylor was named in the top 10 p4p by Ring Magazine. It was just a kind of typo, like Technical_Skills numerous spelling errors. We all make mistakes of different kinds. I see on old polls Parody picked Rahman to KO Maskaev and Brewster to KO Lyakhovich.

[OptimusWolf]

Don't you think it was a little strange that after beating Hopkins (no.1) Taylor only landed at 9 on the list? When Hatton beat Tszyu (3?) he landed higher.

Perhaps it was because of the controversy surrounding the decision, but I remember on here he was definitely placed above Hatton in almost all the lists, at 4 or 5.

But never no.1 no.

[Technical_Skill]

I think he meant Taylor was named in the top 10 p4p by Ring Magazine. It was just a kind of typo,

Nah there was no typo.

. Taylor on the other hand shot into the P4P top 10 with his victory over Bernard Hopkins 2 years ago (which immediately catapulted him to Ring Magazine's P4P number 1).

****ing hell, you are such a joke.
1). Ring Magazine named him their P4P number 1 fighter after he defeated Bernard Hopkins. It stated this at the ****ing time, so why dont you just read the original post and notice it.

lol, and he insulted me so bad too, but i knew if i just boxed him instead of fighting, he couldnt survive.

lol.

[Parody]

I think he meant Taylor was named in the top 10 p4p by Ring Magazine. It was just a kind of typo, like Technical_Skills numerous spelling errors. We all make mistakes of different kinds. I see on old polls Parody picked Rahman to KO Maskaev and Brewster to KO Lyakhovich.

This is a boxing forum, not a English class...Majority of the Posters picked Rahman to KO Maskaev and Brewster t KO Liakhovich, so your point is?

Actually I could be wrong because I dont know my spellings.

[Steelhammer86]

This is a boxing forum, not a English class...Majority of the Posters picked Rahman to KO Maskaev and Brewster t KO Liakhovich, so your point is?

Actually I could be wrong because I dont know my spellings.

My point is that everyone makes mistakes, so let's not start threads over it or say they have "no boxing knowledge"

[Parody]

My point is that everyone makes mistakes, so let's not start threads over it or say they have "no boxing knowledge"

When did I say that? Can you quote me on that please?

[Steelhammer86]

When did I say that? Can you quote me on that please?

Someone else posted that, not yourself, and worse, started this thread to humiliate Miksterious. See above. You seemed to enjoy it since you posted "someone got owned".

And I have nothing against people who couldn't learn to spell. I have a friend who has a mildly ******ed son who has a problem learning to spell in school, but I still like him, he may be slow but a he's a nice kid.