Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Taylor Ring Mag p4p Number one?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
    Havent had anytime to read all posts. But what has been said? If JOe could beat HOpkins and JT would that mean he has beaten better people than PBF has? I would say yes. JT and Hopkins are top rated boys now.
    Doesnt mean to say he is more talented than PBF. But i would agree that beating 2 guys like Hopkins and JT would impress me a lot.
    Its in another thread, but for the low-down just read the first2/3 pages of this thread,

    Its the reason someone is desperately trying to save whats left of their crediblity by trying to engage me,

    If they want thier crediblity back, that person should log out of boxingscene, click on the 'recycle bin' and hope it allows them to restore it.

    lol.

    I set the record straight, nothing left to prove. lol.

    Comment


    • #42
      He did get a serious roasting on here today didnt he?

      lol

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by $iN View Post
        Miksterious, you're a bigger joke than Hatton and Calzaghe combined. You are almost up to JD1986's status as the biggest joke on BoxingScene. It's obvious you know nothing about what happens in boxing outside of your country. You were clearly trying to overhype Taylor so you could gloat just in case Calzaghe fought and beat Taylor, much like you've mentioned that Tsyzu was #1 P4P when he fought Hatton due to that dominating victory over Sharmba Mitchell.
        I dont believe I ever claimed that. I said that he was A top P4P fighter, which he was. It has LITERALLY NOTHING to do with overhyping Taylor as that was not in any way the purpose of the discussion. Which makes it all the more ridiculous that TS has launched himself on this point as though it somehow wins the debate for him.


        Originally posted by Technical_Skill View Post
        Its in another thread, but for the low-down just read the first2/3 pages of this thread,

        Its the reason someone is desperately trying to save whats left of their crediblity by trying to engage me,

        If they want thier crediblity back, that person should log out of boxingscene, click on the 'recycle bin' and hope it allows them to restore it.

        lol.

        I set the record straight, nothing left to prove. lol.
        Lets not mess around here. The low-down, which anyone can see from that thread is that we were debating the matter I discussed, you were being ridiculous in your outlandish claims...as I have detailed here and I claimed that Taylor is an established P4P fighter (which is right), however I wrongly backed that up by using a source that claimed that Taylor was P4P number 1 after beating Hopkins (which is not right) and you immediately forgot about the longer running debate we'd had and completely nailed yourself onto that one fairly meaningless point.

        Go back to the original debate, the larger one, the one that we started with, the one that it was all about and admit that you were talking utter ****e. A statistic about Taylor being higher up the P4P list than he actually was (when the point that he's an established P4P fighter, remains true) has very little to do with the fact that people could make a fair argument for Calzaghe's biggest scalps are better than PBF's biggest scalps IF he defeats Hopkins and Taylor.

        Again, avoid it if you want. You've already made your ridiculous argument that I paraphrased above:

        Technical_Skill - No. That is utterly inarguable. To argue that would be to claim that Calzaghe is the better boxer than Floyd. Has better skills than Floyd. Has a better legacy than Floyd. Is a greater all-time fighter than Floyd and has accomplished more in his career than Floyd has.
        Perfectly and idiotically clear.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Super Cartel View Post
          He did get a serious roasting on here today didnt he?

          lol
          Yes, im ****tin myself at all these massive posts hes writing trying to explain himself, game over for him dude, all you gotta do is talk boxing to him, and its game over.

          Comment


          • #45
            Yes, im ****tin myself at all these massive posts hes writing trying to explain himself, game over for him dude, all you gotta do is talk boxing to him, and its game over.
            hehehehe

            Im trying to read them and its just like "blah blah blah blah"
            going over the same old tired ass points

            Comment


            • #46
              Points that have been ignored because they dont suit your purpose.

              You chaps, evidently, cant debate.

              Comment


              • #47
                Mik im no part of it Bra im like a third party witness lol
                I cant even make out what was orignally said its gone that far off its radar
                Im just sitting back and reading these ongoing posts and its just ****ing
                off its head lol

                Going over and over

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by $iN View Post
                  He beat Lacy. He doesn't need to fight any other decent fighters for the rest of his career...
                  Simply put, Lacy is not better than the people PBF has fought. But the way in which JOe handled Lacy was as impressive as anything PBF has ever done against his opponents. And i wouldnt put his destruction of Gatti on the same level. Again, if Joe were to beat Hopkins at light heavy and JT and kessler there wouldnt be anything left for Joe to do. Nothing more he could achieve. Those achievements would fare well against anything anyone else has achieved. But it is a big if he can beat those guys?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                    Simply put, Lacy is not better than the people PBF has fought. But the way in which JOe handled Lacy was as impressive as anything PBF has ever done against his opponents. And i wouldnt put his destruction of Gatti on the same level.
                    What have you been watching? Mayweather> Gatti is probably the most clincal display of boxing skills seen in any ring for a long time,

                    Mayweather landed vitually every shot in boxing, and the combination work was incredible,

                    What was the famous combination, he did on gatti? (Someone tell me)

                    I think it was uppercut to the body, straight right, hook, fient, sickening body shot,

                    JC was OUTSTANDING against lacy, think Mayweather gatti was more comprehensive, lacy went 12 rounds, gatti went 6.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Technical_Skill View Post
                      What have you been watching? Mayweather> Gatti is probably the most clincal display of boxing skills seen in any ring for a long time,

                      Mayweather landed vitually every shot in boxing, and the combination work was incredible,

                      What was the famous combination, he did on gatti? (Someone tell me)

                      I think it was uppercut to the body, straight right, hook, fient, sickening body shot,

                      JC was OUTSTANDING against lacy, think Mayweather gatti was more comprehensive, lacy went 12 rounds, gatti went 6.
                      I think Mayweather-Corrales was even more impressive than the Gatti fight when you consider not only the way he won, but against the level of fighter he did that against. In Corrales, we are talking about a guy who was a champion multiple times in 2 divisions and the legit champion at 135...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP