Who can beat Mayweathers?

[Mozza]

Why are you telling me that then? lol

go take it up with them, unless you wanna take it up with me.

I'm telling you because you said Mayweather clearly one when it is anything but clear. The fact that it was a split decision and that there has been alot of debate about the fight should tell you this much.

[The Troll]

Ermm, no, one more time.

Professonal boxing is about who does more damage to their opponent and who controls the fight.

[The Troll]

Very often this is achieved through EFFECITIVE AGRESSION.

[Technical_Skill]

I'm telling you because you said Mayweather clearly one when it is anything but clear. The fact that it was a split decision and that there has been alot of debate about the fight should tell you this much.

Oh really, so judges never get it wrong, i dunno what fight you were watching,

I gave oscar rounds 2,3,4.

I had it 117-111 same as Kellermann, say what you want about that, you keep scoring boxing fights for fighters who throw more and land less, good for you.

Im gonna score fights the proper way, whoever lands more, and lands more effective punches wins the round.

once again, this is for you also.

Aggression means **** all in a boxing ring, boxing is about who lands more, simple as, you can throw a thousand punches and land none, if the other guy thows one punch and lands one punch, you lose the round.

Thats boxing, anyone can be agressive, not everyone can box.

Otherwise i wanna see Floyd Mayweather VS Joe wife beater who lives down the road, he's agressive,lol, under your rules maybe he is the one to beat mayweather.

[Easy-E]

No one on that list.

The only person I can see beating Floyd is Winky Wright, just because he's just so much bigger than Floyd is.

Taylor was scratched off my list as possible opponents that would beat Floyd after watching him against Cory Spinks. Floyd would embarrass him.

My thoughts on that are that winky is bigger, but barley has any power and doesnt/wouldnt use his size to his advantage.
it would be a battle of skills, technique and defense, and I give Floyd the slight edge on all 3 of those categories.

[The Troll]

Very seldom do people disagree with my scoring. Seriously though, 117-111-no.

[MrFactor]

This statement here goes to show you know absolutely nothing about floyd or boxing for that matter. Floyd is without a doubt the best at figuring a fighter out and then exploiting their weakness.

I voted OTHER because Wlad Klitschko would juts barely eeek out a SD against Floyd.

[Technical_Skill]

Very often this is achieved through EFFECITIVE AGRESSION.

This is how you score boxing,

Who landed more punches. Mayweather

Who landed the more effective punches? Mayweather.

Does it mean **** if you are agressive and dont land more than your opponent? No.

Quote from iron truth on boxing for real,

Is a guy like Derek Jetter, who swings more than barry bonds, better than bonds who swings less but hits more home runs?

[Easy-E]

I'm telling you because you said Mayweather clearly one when it is anything but clear. The fact that it was a split decision and that there has been alot of debate about the fight should tell you this much.

3 judges gave the fight to D-Hop when he faced Steve Forbes even though he won a max of 3 rounds.
****** judges dont mean the fight was close.
It was competitive, but Floyd won convincingly.
I dont know one knowledgable fan who thinks Oscar won.
Theres a reason all of press row had Floyd winning, as well as Lederman and Kellerman.

[Mozza]

Oh really, so judges never get it wrong, i dunno what fight you were watching,

I gave oscar rounds 2,3,4.

I had it 117-111 same as Kellermann, say what you want about that, you keep scoring boxing fights for fighters who throw more and land less, good for you.

Im gonna score fights the proper way, whoever lands more, and lands more effective punches wins the round.

once again, this is for you also.

I'm not familiar with the rule that says most punches landed wins. If that was the case then there would be no need for judges.