Who can beat Mayweathers?

[Easy-E]

Uh, Floyd has changed his style for numerous fights.

Floyd is KNOWN for having such a versatile style.

Exactly how long have you been watching boxing? 2-3 months tops? And exactly how many fights of Floyd have you watched? 2?

Dont bother talking to ******, ignorant people.
I dont.

[Technical_Skill]

And punchstats are not by any means infailable. They're subject to human error an interpretation as is judging a round 9-10. It's hard as hell to sit there and count every punch landed, to determine which punch is a power punch, which isn't ect..

I never said they were infailable, i questioned wether they were wrong by 50-70 punches landed in favor of mayweather.

[The Troll]

I never said they were infailable, i questioned wether they were wrong by 50-70 punches landed in favor of mayweather.

I wasn't counting punches in that fight, as I dont in any fight, but when I saw the punstate numbers go up in that particular fight, I was surprised by them, that doesn't usually happen. Even in a hypothetical scenario where punchstats ARE 100% accurate they can be used to be misleading as to who is winning a fight. If your playing an angle on it.

[Technical_Skill]

I wasn't counting punches in that fight, as I dont in any fight, but when I saw the punstate numbers go up in that particular fight, I was surprised by them, that doesn't usually happen. Even in a hypothetical scenario where punchstats ARE 100% accurate they can be used to be misleading as to who is winning a fight.

Good for you, mayweather clearly won the fight, with or without the punchstats.

[The Troll]

Good for you, mayweather clearly won the fight, with or without the punchstats.

I would score the fight for Mayweather 7-5 but I could see it being a draw for De La Hoya's superior punching power and agression. I wouldn't argue with it. But I've already been through this.

[Mozza]

Good for you, mayweather clearly won the fight, with or without the punchstats.

How clear though? I think anyone who gives less than four rounds to Oscar needs to get Mayweather's **** out their mouth.

[Technical_Skill]

I would score the fight for Mayweather 7-5 but I could see it being a draw for De La Hoya's superior punching power and agression. I wouldn't argue with it. But I've already been through this.

Couldnt be bothered to repeat myself, here's one i made earlier.

Aggression means **** all in a boxing ring, boxing is about who lands more, simple as, you can throw a thousand punches and land none, if the other guy thows one punch and lands one punch, you lose the round.

Thats boxing, anyone can be agressive, not everyone can box.

Otherwise i wanna see Floyd Mayweather VS Joe wife beater who lives down the road, he's agressive,lol, under your rules maybe he is the one to beat mayweather.

[Technical_Skill]

How clear though? I think anyone who gives less than four rounds to Oscar needs to get Mayweather's **** out their mouth.

Why are you telling me that then? lol

go take it up with them, unless you wanna take it up with me.

[The Troll]

Couldnt be bothered to repeat myself, here's one i made earlier.

Usually the agressor in a boxing match is dictating the action and pressing the fight. Most of the time the agressor should be scored as winning the round if this criteria are met.

[Technical_Skill]

Usually the agressor in a boxing match is dictating the action and pressing the fight. Most of the time the agressor should be scored as winning the round if this criteria are met.

Ermm, no, one more time.

Aggression means **** all in a boxing ring, boxing is about who lands more, simple as, you can throw a thousand punches and land none, if the other guy thows one punch and lands one punch, you lose the round.

Thats boxing, anyone can be agressive, not everyone can box.

Otherwise i wanna see Floyd Mayweather VS Joe wife beater who lives down the road, he's agressive,lol, under your rules maybe he is the one to beat mayweather.