Very interesting point. What is the point? That you can not read
. My comment was directed to the person that I quoted. Saying that Cotto has problems with slick boxers and he mentioned malignaggi. He was the one who said look at this fight to see how many problems Cotto has with slick boxers. In my response I pointed out what happened in that fight, nothing to do with Pauli and Floyd. Please show me when I said that Pauli M was anywhere near Mayweather skill level, or that what Cotto did to Pauli would be the outcome between a fight with Cotto and Floyd? Yeap that correct I never said that.
Now when did I talk about Oscar in my post? It looks like once again you are making assumptions out of nothing, so please if your reading comprehension level is not good, don't post. Now if you are alluding to DLH when I mention the 15% connect rate, I was not talking about DLH, I was referring that someone who has problems with pure boxers would connect 15% of their punches that did not happen in the Malignaggi fight. Too what my post was talking and referencing too.
Here we go again, when did I talk about Tito vs. Mayweather? That's correct, I didn't. I think this is a ****** fight, which I more than likely would end up buying at the last minute. Because I like watching Floyd fight.
Now you said "I don't know whether to laugh or just look at you in amazment for such a rediculous comparison" I expect from you to not cry or laugh now when you re-read my previous post, but cry at your lever of reading comprehension and attention to detail, because I never made a comparison. I simply made the observation that Cotto had no problems with malignaggi as he said.
Now, what are my thoughts on Floyd vs. Cotto? I will wait until the Judah fight to say. I like Cotto a lot, but I like Mayweather just as much for different reasons.
. My comment was directed to the person that I quoted. Saying that Cotto has problems with slick boxers and he mentioned malignaggi. He was the one who said look at this fight to see how many problems Cotto has with slick boxers. In my response I pointed out what happened in that fight, nothing to do with Pauli and Floyd. Please show me when I said that Pauli M was anywhere near Mayweather skill level, or that what Cotto did to Pauli would be the outcome between a fight with Cotto and Floyd? Yeap that correct I never said that.Now when did I talk about Oscar in my post? It looks like once again you are making assumptions out of nothing, so please if your reading comprehension level is not good, don't post. Now if you are alluding to DLH when I mention the 15% connect rate, I was not talking about DLH, I was referring that someone who has problems with pure boxers would connect 15% of their punches that did not happen in the Malignaggi fight. Too what my post was talking and referencing too.
Here we go again, when did I talk about Tito vs. Mayweather? That's correct, I didn't. I think this is a ****** fight, which I more than likely would end up buying at the last minute. Because I like watching Floyd fight.
Now you said "I don't know whether to laugh or just look at you in amazment for such a rediculous comparison" I expect from you to not cry or laugh now when you re-read my previous post, but cry at your lever of reading comprehension and attention to detail, because I never made a comparison. I simply made the observation that Cotto had no problems with malignaggi as he said.
Now, what are my thoughts on Floyd vs. Cotto? I will wait until the Judah fight to say. I like Cotto a lot, but I like Mayweather just as much for different reasons.
Comment