Are you trying to imply that Mayweather was as dominant against De La Hoya as Calzaghe against Lacy then?
Mayweather-De La Hoya: Great Fight, Wrong Decision
Collapse
-
On that night, Lacy wasn't friggin touching Calzaghe, even on Lacy's best night. Point is, Lacy wasn't able to do what he did to 21 prior victims, nor was Oscar able to do what he did to 38 other fighters.Lacy was able to do against Calzaghe what he did against most ofhis other opponents prior to fighting Calzaghe, he would have been effective and won the fight.Comment
-
constantly throwing the jab made him look busier thruout the round, power or no power MANY jabs fell short.no it doesn't make it look like floyd was more active. it makes it look like he threw more clearly landed punches on oscar. thrwoing a jab is not a power punch, so it can't cause a fighter to look that active unless they throw in bunches. floyd did catch oscar with a lot of jabs, even if he threw them with hardly any power. he still landed. he didn't land many of them, but he did land a lot of them, and they were in clear view of the judges. i've watched the fight in slow motion about 5 times now, floyd landed a lot of jabs.Comment
-
The heavier hitter does get the benefit when he lands punches in for a good part of the fight or better part of the fight is dictating the action. Lacy was totally in ineffectual in EVERY SINGLE area against Calzaghe. Again are you trying to imply that Mayweather was as dominant against De La Hoya as Calzaghe against Lacy.
Calzaghe totally dominated Lacy because he kept him at a range where he couldn't do anything and pounded him. Which goes back to my original point that drawing any kind of comparison here is entirely ascinine.
Or are you trying to say Mayweather and Calzaghe have equatable styles? Your all over the place.Comment
-
That did not happen much. When Oscar did throw the jab, he normally had Floyd backing up and was able to pester Floyd. Oscar abandoned it simply because he did not the faith in his jab, when in reality is would have helped him.Floyd found out Oscar doesn't like when you throw rights over his jab, and doesn't like to deal with speed. Too bad it took him 7 rounds to see this, or the fight wouldn't be as discussed.Comment
-
What I'm saying and have been saying is that you can have all the power in the world, if you don't land, you don't win. Oscar's best asset going in was power, which he didn't ever get to use. His jab, an extremely weak punch in comparison to his normally fantastic left hook, was his best punch, and by fights end, that became ineffective to the point he abandoned using it.The heavier hitter does get the benefit when he lands punches in for a good part of the fight or better part of the fight is dictating the action. Lacy was totally in ineffectual in EVERY SINGLE area against Calzaghe. Again are you trying to imply that Mayweather was as dominant against De La Hoya as Calzaghe against Lacy.
Calzaghe totally dominated Lacy because he kept him at a range where he couldn't do anything and pounded him. Which goes back to my original point that drawing any kind of comparison here is entirely ascinine.
Or are you trying to say Mayweather and Calzaghe have equatable styles? Your all over the place.
So, his 1 good shot he'd get in a round on Floyd over the last 5 doesn't equate to the 5-6-7 that Floyd landed on Oscar. The first 6 or 7 rounds were even, but once Floyd figured him out, it was game over.Comment
Comment