You are an idiot!!! Nobody ran in that fight. Hell he didn't even use his mobility and stood with him against the ropes while Oscar held and punched. He boxed the **** out of him in the middle of the ring with lead right hand and counter punches. He basically dominated him 9 rounds to 3. That was domination and people like you and that damn judge are idiot fan boys.
De La Hoya-Mayweather Post Comments (Threads Merged)
Collapse
-
-
I feeling Max Kellerman much more now. I think only 1 judge scored the fight right with the score of 116 - 112. That judge that was talking 115 -113 oscar need to be shot and hung. Floyd beat up on Oscar and didn't even use his best asset, his feet. He stayed real composed with his subtle movements and stayed in the pocket the whole fight. If he would have moved his feet more he would have really buckled his knees...Comment
-
[QUOTE=KJ;2336091][QUOTE=Mishra100;2336056]Yeah! There is the right hand. Now get the left hand and I will be happy.
The one at 8 seconds on the youtube video of the 12th round in this thread.
Which left hand?
[/SIZE]
It was right after that huge right hand.Comment
-
i figured floyd would win, but i still think he needs to fight other fighters to prove himself some more... pple like hatton, margarito, or cotto just to name a few... i think a younger de la hoya would've made the fight better, but that's just speculation... floyd should've won by UD in my mindComment
-
Mayweather Vs DLH
To be honest, I cant see how Mayweather won that fight! He didnt really come forward at all, Yes he boxed well, But I nver see much aggression from Mayweather at all..I had it a draw or DLH on points..Never could have seen it A Mayweather win...And I aint know Mayweather or DLH fan there both good fighters.Comment
-
Well I guess it just depends on what you credit when you score the fight. If you credit aggression as the most important criterion than I can see why you scored it that way. I never felt Mayweather was taking the fight to him, but imo there are other aspects to scoring the fight. If you watched closely a lot of DLH's punches were partially deflected or missed. Mayweather landed the more "meaningful" punches and was more accurate. I don't think there is a much of an argument that Mayweather did not win rounds 9, 10, and 11 and DLH won 2 and 7. Other than that the rounds were pretty close so it just depends on what you see.Comment
-
Fair comment m8, I can see where you coming from.Well I guess it just depends on what you credit when you score the fight. If you credit aggression as the most important criterion than I can see why you scored it that way. I never felt Mayweather was taking the fight to him, but imo there are other aspects to scoring the fight. If you watched closely a lot of DLH's punches were partially deflected or missed. Mayweather landed the more "meaningful" punches and was more accurate. I don't think there is a much of an argument that Mayweather did not win rounds 9, 10, and 11 and DLH won 2 and 7. Other than that the rounds were pretty close so it just depends on what you see.Comment
-
De La Hoya was doing the same thing that SRL did to Hagler.. he'd wait until like 30 seconds till the end of the round after throwing complete bull**** the entire round, flurry, run away until 10 seconds left, flurry again, and take the round because of 'activity'. TWO FLURRIES A ****ING ROUND DOES NOT MEAN YOU WIN THE ROUND WHEN YOU DON'T DO **** INBETWEEN. Mayweather constantly threw punches, DLH threw 1-2 flurries a round. Wooptie ****ing doo. DLH was fighting smart and that's how he could have won but he should have thrown MORE flurries instead of 2 a round. Not to mention most of the punches did not land.. anyone with two ****ing eyes and an IQ above 100 can see that.
Get off DLH's **** you ***gots and learn to watch boxing for what it is - BOXING. If this was "slap each other for 10 seconds and then sit in the corner" then maybe DLH would have won. Maybe.Comment
Comment