It's no problem to discuss different topics in English. But if it isn't your 1st. language you sometimes bump into words or expressions you haven't heard before. Don't come down on ppl for that reason. (Sorry about the language in my previous post, I'm sure you understood the sarcasm.) Gotta go. I'll be back in half an hour.
americans like kessler so much just because they hate calzaghe
Collapse
-
i suggest you look closer at his record.
his biggest wins have been against beyer, mundine, lucas and andrade.
#1. beyer. marcus was past his best when he fought kessler and when ottke and veit were primed he was only the#3 guy in germany behind them, all 3 are scrubs imo.
#2. mundine. LOL this guys a joke he thinks he's muhammad ali. he was stopped bt sven ottke who only has around 5 ko's in 38 fights. BUM!!!
#3. lucas. always lost against A-level guys and even some b-level guys.
#4. andrade. this to me is probably his most impressive win but andrade is still very green and should not have taken the fight imo. kessler showed dominance but couldn't put him away.
the rest of kesslers record consists of butchers, bakers and candal stick makers, as i said before he's looked good against scrubs.
Kessler was 25 years old when he became WBA-champ and 27 when he unified
Calzaghe was 25 years old when he became WBO-champ and 34 when he unified.
There is your true comparison - and it shows us that they are pretty even when it come to when they stepped up...Comment
-
I told you to prove it, but you keep beating around the bush!I dont care a less about my ratings or karma. In fact I'd happily encourage anyone to go out and rate me as poorly as you'd like. I find it very amusing how painfully predictable you are and how your enjoyment here seems to rest on being a 'karma' and 'rating' bully. That strikes me as being more than a little sad.
I'd happily agree to be given a permanent ban if I were to be proven to having an alt profile, or being an alt profile. However, perhaps you ought to familiarise yourself with the works of philosopher David Hume. I'll even provide a link for your continued educational development.
One of Hume's theories was that where one person was claiming the exceptional and the other the reasonable, it is up to the person claiming the exceptional to provide exceptional proof. Ergo to put it into context of this conversation. You claim that I am an alt, that hinges on the exceptional because a). Nobody else seems to believe it, putting you strongly in the minority and b). For me to be an alt, I'dve had to spend an unreasonable amount of time creating this profile, altering my grammar and spelling for my 'other accounts' and arguing views which do not reflect my own so as to carve out this 'unique alt profile'.
My argument, that I...like the VAST majority of posters on here, claim that I am an original and individual poster. Because of the details mentioned above as well as the fact that most people on here are not alts, my argument is reasonable.
Therefore the onus is on you to provide the 'exceptional' proof to the contrary. Therefore you contact BPP if you are so confident. You are an established and long-term poster, whereas I am newer and less known and less inclined to bother an administrator with the futile and redundant task of making you look like more of an idiot.
Don't waste my time anymore!
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
what does stepping up have to do with who wins when they fight, thats the point im making. kessler hasn't fought anyone on lacy's level yet and we all know what happened in the fight between joe and lacy. lacy imo is a better fighter than kessler is, the way he dimantled rob reid proved this. winning straps against scrubs means nothing, joe's the ring champion and it doesn't matter how many alphabet soups kessler wins that will remain a fact.
i see kesslers been very quite since he was offered $5m to fight joe in cardiff, talks cheap the offeres there and the dane should man-up and take a fight with #1 guy for his highest purse to date.Comment
Comment