5 Titles in 5 Divisions or 20 Straight Title Defenses?

Which is the more impressive feat: Winning titles in 5 different weight classes or accumulating 20 straight title defenses in one division?

[Mick Hucknall]

depends who you have fought in your defences and your title wins. Obviously this is your way of creating another British/American divide thread. I take 20 title defences against good opposition over 5 titles in 5 weight categories against good opposition

[FeelTheA-Force]

who beat Kostya Tszyu at 140

[Easy-E]

Moving up and winning titles in higher weight classes is more impressive and shows more skill than staying at one weight.

[cortdawg25]

We already know which 1 is more impressive and more difficult. It is the reason Why P4P was made because of feats like this. 5 titles is 5 different weight classes is history in the making and extraordinary. 20 defenses is remarkable too, whether they fought some tough competition or managed to cherry pick 20 opponents in row is impressive too, but 5 time champion in 5 different weight classes against true champions is quite marvelous!

[FeelTheA-Force]

We already know which 1 is more impressive and more difficult. It is the reason Why P4P was made because of feats like this. 5 titles is 5 different weight classes is history in the making and extraordinary. 20 defenses is remarkable too, whether they fought some tough competition or managed to cherry pick 20 opponents in row is impressive too, but 5 time champion in 5 different weight classes against true champions is quite marvelous!

Gatti is a bum, whos he at 140 ??????????

[Easy-E]

depends who you have fought in your defences and your title wins. Obviously this is your way of creating another British/American divide thread. I take 20 title defences against good opposition over 5 titles in 5 weight categories against good opposition

That doesnt make any sense.
How is staying at one weight your comfortable in more impressive then moving up 5 weight classes, which could be anywhere from a 24 pound or 30 pound difference from where you started.
Makes no sense.

[Mick Hucknall]

because you are in most cases facing hand picked opponents as you are stepping up, whereas if your gonna make 20 defences atleast a handful are gonna have to be against top 5 in your weight class

[Easy-E]

because you are in most cases facing hand picked opponents as you are stepping up, whereas if your gonna make 20 defences atleast a handful are gonna have to be against top 5 in your weight class

Maybe as undisputed champ, but not as an individual belt holder.

[Easy-E]

because you are in most cases facing hand picked opponents as you are stepping up, whereas if your gonna make 20 defences atleast a handful are gonna have to be against top 5 in your weight class

And i dont think thats true either.
If your moving up in weight class your going to have to fight one of the top fighters in the divison at least.