Mayweather or Mosley: Who is the More Accomplished Fighter?

[Guest]

He lost because he fought great fighters, how can you compare Floyd's resume favorably over Mosley's when mosley has fought the better fighters?

Is Valuev better than Ali?... Valuev never lost a fight. lol

Exactly, if valuev fought prime Foreman, Fraizier etc, he would have been in a body bag.

So WHO you fight has a bearing on your achievements, the more top fighters you face, the more likely you are to lose.

Would you consider Ali a great if he had lost every significant fight in his career?

[Technical_Skill]

Wait, so now you're essentially comparing Floyd's resume to Valuev's, and Shane's resume to Ali's, to prove a point....

You're joking, right?

Nope, not at all

Just re-read what you wrote and its a logical point,

The more top-fighters you fight, the more chance you have of losing.

Losing to top fighters does not mean Mosley doesn't have a better resume than Floyd, all it means is he fought the better fighters and lost to some of them.

[Technical_Skill]

Would you consider Ali a great if he had lost every significant fight in his career?

Most likely not, although this has no relvance to Mosley since Mosley has not lost every significant fight in his carrer.

[GunStar]

i have seen it and apparently i have better a perception of the fight than you do...im telling you, monday we score it...

floyd is one of my 10 favourite fighters...but that doesnt mean i dont dislike some things of his, especially how he claims to be undefeated...

monday ill prove it to you because this weekend i dont have time...

I've seen the fight more then 10 times, so I don't have to wait until Monday nor do I want to see it again. Do you want me PM you the site where you can download the fight, so you can actually see it for once??

[-Antonio-]

Since when does losing to good fighters make you more accomplished? With that logic, Reggie Strickland would be more accomplished. Mayweather has plenty more good wins, and Mosley has the best win.

[deliveryman]

He lost because he fought great fighters, how can you compare Floyd's resume favorably over Mosley's when mosley has fought the better fighters?

Is Valuev better than Ali?... Valuev never lost a fight. lol

Exactly, if valuev fought prime Foreman, Fraizier etc, he would have been in a body bag.

So WHO you fight has a bearing on your achievements, the more top fighters you face, the more likely you are to lose.

Using your logic, ChopChop is a more accomplished fighter than Forrest.

Corley has these names on his resume:

Floyd Mayweather
Miguel Cotto
Zab Judah
Junior Witter

(never mind he lost all of those fights, because losing doesn't matter, right?)

Compared to Forrest who has...

Mosely on his resume... And that's about it, oh and I guess Vince Phillips.

[deliveryman]

Most likely not, although this has no relvance to Mosley since Mosley has not lost every significant fight in his carrer.

All of them, except 1.

Won the first Oscar fight.
Lost the second Oscar fight.
Lost the first Winky fight.
Lost the second Winky fight.
Lost the first Forrest fight.
Lost the second Forrest fight.

1-5, wow what an astounding record.

[Technical_Skill]

Using your logic, ChopChop is a more accomplished fighter than Forrest.

Corley has these names on his resume:

Floyd Mayweather
Miguel Cotto
Zab Judah
Junior Witter

Compared to Forrest who has...

Mosely on his resume... And that's about it.

No it doesn't

FOR THE LAST TIME

all its means is he has a better resume, it doesnt mean he is the more accomplished fighter.

PBF is the more accomplished fighter, Mosley has the better resume.

It aint that difficult.

[deliveryman]

No it doesn't

FOR THE LAST TIME

all its means is he has a better resume, it doesnt mean he is the more accomplished fighter.

PBF is the more accomplished fighter, Mosley has the better resume.

It aint that difficult.

Please explain how Mosely has the better resumé when:

a) Floyd has fought more world champions than Shane has.
b) Floyd has fought the better overall opposition
c) Shane has lost to 4 legitimate times in his career (should really be 5)
d) Floyd is undefeated
e) Floyd has been the lineal champ in more weight divisions

And you're trying to justify he has a better resume because he lost (and not only lost, but beaten pretty badly) to Winky and Forrest?

I rest my case.

[Technical_Skill]

Please explain how Mosely has the better resumé when:

a) Floyd has fought more world champions than Shane has.
b) Floyd has fought the better overall opposition
c) Shane has lost to 4 legitimate times in his career (should really be 5)
d) Floyd is undefeated
e) Floyd has been the lineal champ in more weight divisions

And you're trying to justify he has a better resume because he lost to Winky and Forrest?

I rest my case.

What case? lol

Resume = Who you have fought.

Nothing else, the other stuff you mention are ACHIVEMENTS, yes PBF has achieved more than Mosley, yes he is more accomplished than Mosley.

But Mosley has the better RESUME, why?

Because he has fought better fighters than PBF.

lol.