What do u guys think?
Do u think Vargas wouldve beat Tito if wasnt for the intentional lowblows he received
Collapse
-
Do u think Vargas wouldve beat Tito if wasnt for the intentional lowblows he received
41yes vargas wouldve won26.83%11no vargas wouldve still lost73.17%30Tags: None -
-
Comment
-
No, vargas woulda still lost, everytime he put his hands on trinidad he hurt him, and anytime tito would put his hands on vagas hed hurt him. They both had it in their fists it was a fight of who was willing to get off first and tito just ended up willing to take the risk and unload on vargas before vargas did on him.Comment
-
vargas had 3 very good rounds in that fight - you don't lose a fight off of low blows. 10 times out of 10, vargas would have lost that fight, you don't put a 23 year old champion being groomed for the big time in there w/ a killer like tito that early in your career.
it was an awful fight for vargas' corner to take.Comment
-
wtf vargas received 3 intentional lowblows from tito how in the **** dont u think that it didnt affect the fight????? when u recieve a lowblow u loose alot of stamina imagine 3 hard intentional lowblows u got to be crazyyy if u dont think it affected the fight.Comment
-
BS!!!!! Vargas is and was GABRBAGE next to Tito...if they fought 10x Tito would have beat him 10x. Damn, Mexicans get over it...your man was a windex chinned wannabe vato. Scowling doesn't win fights...nor does steroids. That same round...VARGAS thumbed Tito in the eye. The low blow was not intentional...be real!? Tito was a killer. What is your excuse for Vargas getting rocked 20 seconds into the 1st round? Did Tito hit him low in the dressing room??? He went down like he got shot from the balcony. Haha! Yo, mexico...cut it out...Vargas was NEVER on Tito's level.

It took Hopkins a bigger man 12 rounds to KO tito... You really think Vargas was gonna KO Tito???Comment
Gran Campeon
Comment