Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sam Langford vs. Roy Jones JR

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Jones easily. Unfair to compare the pre war fighters to modern day athletes.
    BodyBagz BodyBagz moneytheman Ascended like this.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by tophat1 View Post
      Jones easily. Unfair to compare the pre war fighters to modern day athletes.
      You're ascended as I am, you never become a sellout to not be attacked by the opposition,these people are crazy on this site who go against us,who go against recorded footage they cannot alter,they cannot alter fighters on footage to make them more advanced

      Roy would destroy him even in his amateur form this is how much more advanced of a era he fought in,even a amateur 70s would destroy Sam
      Last edited by Ascended; 10-15-2023, 06:31 PM.
      tophat1 tophat1 likes this.

      Comment


      • #33
        Those sloppy old timey bastards would not stand a chance vs modern fighters.
        RJJ by annihilation. (if the ref didn't DQ him 1st).
        moneytheman Ascended likes this.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post
          Those sloppy old timey bastards would not stand a chance vs modern fighters.
          RJJ by annihilation. (if the ref didn't DQ him 1st).
          Roy would destroy him even in his amateur form this is how much more advanced of a era he fought in,even a amateur 70s would destroy Sam

          this is how he really fought https://********/P-TqTITpAf8?si=a4zy0syI9ffT8Ib4 not those silly highlights which lazy crazy idiots only speak of with a guy who fought in 30-40s,or a dempsey era,highlights don't show every obsolete tech and flaws of a era
          Last edited by Ascended; 10-15-2023, 07:49 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Ascended View Post

            Roy would destroy him even in his amateur form this is how much more advanced of a era he fought in,even a amateur 70s would destroy Sam

            this is how he really fought https://********/P-TqTITpAf8?si=a4zy0syI9ffT8Ib4 not those silly highlights which lazy crazy idiots only speak of with a guy who fought in 30-40s,or a dempsey era,highlights don't show every obsolete tech and flaws of a era
            Boxing ''purists'' swear by those primitive goofballz.
            It makes me sick looking at them
            moneytheman Ascended likes this.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

              Boxing ''purists'' swear by those primitive goofballz.
              It makes me sick looking at them
              They think they can alter footage to make those guys more advanced,I can't and im ascended they aren't so I know they can't,they think quotes and lies said can alter footage
              BodyBagz BodyBagz likes this.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Ascended View Post

                They think they can alter footage to make those guys more advanced,I can't and im ascended they aren't so I know they can't,they think quotes and lies said can alter footage
                And those same purists have the gall to complain about Wilder ?!?!?
                Don't know why they still bother watching the sport
                moneytheman Ascended likes this.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

                  And those same purists have the gall to complain about Wilder ?!?!?
                  Don't know why they still bother watching the sport
                  Well they don't watch full matches is the problem,they have said louis/rock would beat deontay,yet deon was way more advanced than that whole novice like era,deon actually was very technical good in amateurs,yet they never bring that ver up

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

                    Boxing ''purists'' swear by those primitive goofballz.
                    It makes me sick looking at them
                    why has no footage even been altered to prove me wrong?,if I'm a liar,where is the footage showing any 30-40s guys as advanced as guys in 70s-90s,I have begged these not sane people since last year,no one will expose me as a fact as wrong,I have always exposed them as wrong which isn't a opinion

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Ascended View Post

                      Well they don't watch full matches is the problem,they have said louis/rock would beat deontay,yet deon was way more advanced than that whole novice like era,deon actually was very technical good in amateurs,yet they never bring that ver up
                      So many fights from that decrepit era don't even exist YET they use them as proof

                      ''Well, writers would not glorify them if it weren't true .''

                      Laughable
                      moneytheman Ascended likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP