Amir Khan - one punch KO artist?

[.Mik.]

You've got a lot of potential.

Thats all he really needs at this stage.

[Jim_Davis]

I hate it when people compare Khan to Hamed because theyre both ******. Naz was a much harder hitter no doubt. Was showing a lot more at this level. Although you can't knock Khan. That guy was the best super featherweight in his country and he got KTFO. AND I WAS THERE MUAHAHAAHA

[Nacho_Analstain]

khan is better than naz in some ways and naz is better than khan in some ways,khan is the better boxer,naz had sick power and is more of a legend...its all about styles,only time will tell,but i think khan is the future of british boxing..ill support my home town hero all the way (of course)

[Tysonisgod]

lol he's only been knockin weak featherweights. against a genuine lightweght in drilzane none of his lil girly punches did *** all. take away his speed and you aint got much at this point.

well said

[Nacho_Analstain]

if you dont mind,could you please list a few fighters that had outstanding records after 11 fights? bernard hopkins lost his first fight to a guy who had no fights,he went on to be 1 of the best

[rooq]

lol he's only been knockin weak featherweights. against a genuine lightweght in drilzane none of his lil girly punches did *** all. take away his speed and you aint got much at this point.

well said

drilzane's a light welterweight not lightweight. and wtf@lil girly punches.

anyway, theres no comparison between naz and khan. naz was a one-off and unorthodox as ****. khan is a very fast orthodox fighter who did think about showboating early in his career, but has since grown up (or told off by warren / harrison).

if warren keeps putting weak opponents in front of him i hope khan keeps knocking them out in the first round because it will force warren to start putting him in with tougher opponents.

franks hinted that khan will fight the winner of thaxton - lawton, which will be a huge step up if it happens and so not really likely. i think he's far more likely to put him in with limmond or meager first because neither are particularly big punchers but will give a good account of themselves.

[rooq]

if you dont mind,could you please list a few fighters that had outstanding records after 11 fights? bernard hopkins lost his first fight to a guy who had no fights,he went on to be 1 of the best

definitley agree. the only reason people are expecting so much of him is that every second of his pro career has been televised plus khan himself has talked about wanting to be world champ by 21.

one of the exceptions is probably david haye who's 10th fight was against Arthur Williams and 11th fight against Carl Thompson. but then again we know what happened against thompson so perhaps this rate of progression was a little too fst.

[Jim_Davis]

People want to see Khan fail. As soon as there is anything promising in Britain the British people like to knock them down.

[Nacho_Analstain]

yep,plus the guy hes fighting next,is ranked 10th by the wbo,with a record of 20-3 (not certain on that),thats quite a record...at the end of the day..khan is a good fresh talent,with skill speed and power is gradually coming along,he has shown improvement in every single fight and at this point of his career he deserves all the respect he has earned and nobody can deny him of it,any decent boxing fan knows he has potential and otherwise they are basically just a hater,and i cant see what he has done to be hated?

[riza]

[QUOTE=rooq;2176939]drilzane's a light welterweight not lightweight. and wtf@lil girly punches.

drilzane was fightin at light-welter but was small at that weight, hes the same size as khan and none of the punches effected at all. khan does throw a lot of pitty pat bs