Mayweather Fans... lets hear you...

[!! Mr. Soprano]

as a matter of fact, I got a question for Mr Soprano and the other Floyd detractors....why do you all think so highly of fighters who fall and comeback or make comebacks all together, but hate Floyd for never having to comeback? what is it, yall don't like winners?

Boxing is a sport I don't think we need to debate that.

If in any sport, you follow a team.. you will follow that team no matter if they win or loose.

Pre Sanders fight, Wladimir Klistchko was unstoppable and was viewed as the next best thing.
However I bacame a much bigger fan of his after his loss. I saw he was volnurable and that made me want to see him win.

Picking a fighter that is in a class of his own and you know who's gonna win his next fight is ****.. but that's just my opinion

why you got to go there, I've been doing good today. who put that crap there anyways? So you think Mr. Soprano had me in mind when he started this thread. Look Kayjay, I roll with the winners.........

I have no idea what you're talking about.
As a matter of fact, who are you?

[kayjay]

I swear to god some people are ****ing retarted.
People like Floyd for what he does IN the ring.
How simple is that to understand????

Yes but what he's done in the ring, impressive as it is, does not measure up to the regard his fans hold him in. He's not one of the best fighters ever, as of now at least, in fact he pales in comparison to Oscar, Mosely, Wright, Hopkins, and several others in terms of accomplishments in boxing. You can rate people on fan speculation, only on accomplishment.

[Easy-E]

You're the exception and you were in my mind when I said Most with the exception of a handfull posters.

I know you're a hardcore fan, but I don't see you flame anyone...

I know I know.
I like Floyd as a fighter, but not as a person (from what ive seen of him)
I just think you should like or dislike a fighter based on what they do in the ring, and not what they do outside of it, because you never really know who a fighter is outside of the ring.

[Easy-E]

Yes but what he's done in the ring, impressive as it is, does not measure up to the regard his fans hold him in. He's not one of the best fighters ever, as of now at least, in fact he pales in comparison to Oscar, Mosely, Wright, Hopkins, and several others in terms of accomplishments in boxing. You can rate people on fan speculation, only on accomplishment.

Floyd has beaten 10 world champions and won belts in 4 weight classes.
He has an undefeated record of 37-0.
Winky and Hopkins resume's dont compare in that regard, and neither does Mosleys or DLH's. (Im talking about the fact that he is undefeated, both Oscar and I think Mosley have faced more world champs)

If he beats Oscar he will retire 38-0 having faced 11 world champions and winning belts in 5 weight divisions.
Thats top 20 p4p ever in my book.

[Guest]

Floyd has beaten 10 world champions and won belts in 4 weight classes.
He has an undefeated record of 37-0.
Winky and Hopkins resume's dont compare in that regard, and neither does Mosleys or DLH's. (Im talking about the fact that he is undefeated, both Oscar and I think Mosley have faced more world champs)

If he beats Oscar he will retire 38-0 having faced 11 world champions and winning belts in 5 weight divisions.
Thats top 20 p4p ever in my book.

"But... but... he talks so much **** and he's so arrogant that he can't be an all-time great"

[BigCol]

Belts dont matter in this day and age with all of this WBC,WBO,NABF,IBC crap..

[kayjay]

Floyd has beaten 10 world champions and won belts in 4 weight classes.
He has an undefeated record of 37-0.
Winky and Hopkins resume's dont compare in that regard, and neither does Mosleys or DLH's. (Im talking about the fact that he is undefeated, both Oscar and I think Mosley have faced more world champs)

If he beats Oscar he will retire 38-0 having faced 11 world champions and winning belts in 5 weight divisions.
Thats top 20 p4p ever in my book.

That's a spin. DLH, Mosely, and Winky have better wins. Floyd has some good wins but no great ones. "Undefeated" is the most overrated attribute in boxing, like K-Dogg wrote in his Valuev article.

But I don't want to argue his merits with you. He's like W. Klitschko in that people see the potential for greatness that has not yet materialized.

[Guest]

It's real simple.

When you're #1 in the world, a lot of people hate you. It comes with the territory. It's called jealousy.

So a lot of people are jealous of Mayweather and say things they don't mean to make him look bad.

Mayweather's fans defend him like good fans are supposed to, but then everyone gets on their case for doing so.

This thread is so pointless, it's unreal. If you don't like Mayweather (Soprano, Anorak, usual crybabies), THEN DON'T WATCH HIM OR LISTEN TO HIM.

Ha ha ha, look at this silly little boy still calling me names.

Diego****o, SiN... just two reasons why NSB is a **** place to visit these days.

Go and join www.kindergarten.com, little boys... leave boxing discussion to ADULTS.

[Guest]

That's a spin. DLH, Mosely, and Winky have better wins. Floyd has some good wins but no great ones. "Undefeated" is the most overrated attribute in boxing, like K-Dogg wrote in his Valuev article.

But I don't want to argue his merits with you. He's like W. Klitschko in that people see the potential for greatness that has not yet materialized.

I agree, undefeated is overrated. Domination is not and Mayweather has dominated every opponent he's faced. Only once has he even come close to losing...

Also, you say he only has some good wins but what greats did Mayweather avoid? Guys like Mosley and Hatton who would have boosted his resume have been the ones doing the ducking...

[Guest]

It's the internet

This place was made for debate, not to make friends. If everyone on here liked me, something would be seriously wrong.

LOL, this little penis can't see the difference between "debate" and "name calling like a three-year-old" (yes, I realise there was an in-built irony into that sentence, no need to point it out, dumb****s).

Seriously, little boy, if you like "debate" so much, why not debate? Last time I saw the Oxford Union Debating Society they weren't going "Shakespeare's finest work is Hamlet, cos you're a bunch of crybaby pwn azzers, LMAO, pwn!"

GROW UP OR **** OFF.