NAZ vs PAC

[eazy_mas]

Oh, there is no question to me that Marquez found Pacquiao to be too much. It's to his eternal discredit that he doesn't take a rematch. Yes, Hamed was unbeaten. Unbeaten when matched against Paul Ingle, Manuel Medina, and Cesar Soto. It's not about the glossy record, its about who you fight. Hamed only fought one elite fighter in Barrera and lost.

So her is the thing Marquez ducked pac when he was 1D fighter and Hamed was and akward experience fighter not to mention he was he had reach and was southpaw which Marquez struggle with, many of the fighter who are 1 contender sometimes dont fight example Margarito and Willams sitaution. that would finish him off due his experince on the time given that Hamed was on hamed prime.

Hamed was one of the boxers who is most famous in the world after Tyson and Ali. He was entertaining and had the KO thing people wanted and yes people would like to see his ass kicked.

As for Barrera winning Hamed he knew his habit and knew what to do and when to take Hamed. it similar to Sugar Ray Lenorad and roberto Duran in the no mas fight where SRL knew that Duran would be float but in this sitaution Hamed last couple of fight before Barrera was really going downside and everybody seen he was struggling with the fighter he was fighting with and he trained less and less after every fight til he got no more of it

[Mr. Ryan]

So many English club fighters No former and future world title challengers from all over the globe then? ****wad.

Even Manny Steward who was sent tapes said that Naz the best 20-year-old he'd ever seen. That's why he was so eager to get on board with Naz and try to rekindle his old form/potential..

Manny Steward said the only time he wanted to pull one of his fighter's out of a fight was right before Hamed fought Barrera, because he didn't think Hamed had a chance. He couldn't because of the money and the close proximity of the fight.

[Jim_Davis]

Medgoen Singsurat and Rustico Torrecampo were brilliant fighters werent they? How can you even talk **** about Hamed's past opponents when Pacman couldnt beat these.

[Mr. Ryan]

Medgoen Singsurat and Rustico Torrecampo were brilliant fighters werent they? How can you even talk **** about Hamed's past opponents when Pacman couldnt beat these.

Yes, when Pacquiao was a teenager, he had some vulnerabilities. Truth is, the historical powers of boxing will look much more favorably on a guy with KO wins over Barerra and Morales than the gu who got schooled and quit the sport after losing the richest fight in featherweight history.

[K-DOGG]

Who wins? I'd say Pac by UD

Pac by KO. Naz might have been able to get away with that goofy-footed style of his against the run of the mill opposistion and a shot Kevin Kelley; but if you put him in the ring with someone just as fast as him and as powerful and vicious as Manny.....Lights out. Hamed would fight back and would land some stout stuff...who knows, he might even hurt Manny; but attitude is everything and Pacquiao ****s Hamed in my opinion.


Pac by 6th round KO/TKO/retirement.

[Jim_Davis]

Yes, when Pacquiao was a teenager, he had some vulnerabilities. Truth is, the historical powers of boxing will look much more favorably on a guy with KO wins over Barerra and Morales than the gu who got schooled and quit the sport after losing the richest fight in featherweight history.

I'm not talking about Pacquiao's fights against Morales, Barerra and Marquez. Somebody was questioning Naseem's past opponents. Just a point I'm trying to make that he actually beat his.

[Mr. Ryan]

I'm not talking about Pacquiao's fights against Morales, Barerra and Marquez. Somebody was questioning Naseem's past opponents. Just a point I'm trying to make that he actually beat his.

Yes, he beat Paul Ingle and Steve Robinson. Cong****. I could beat them.

[Mr. Ryan]

Pac by KO. Naz might have been able to get away with that goofy-footed style of his against the run of the mill opposistion and a shot Kevin Kelley; but if you put him in the ring with someone just as fast as him and as powerful and vicious as Manny.....Lights out. Hamed would fight back and would land some stout stuff...who knows, he might even hurt Manny; but attitude is everything and Pacquiao ****s Hamed in my opinion.


Pac by 6th round KO/TKO/retirement.

So essentially all of the media and professional pundits of the sport in this thread have picked Pacquiao by KO, while the British posters have picked Naz. Imagine that

[K-Nan]

Pac by KO. Naz might have been able to get away with that goofy-footed style of his against the run of the mill opposistion and a shot Kevin Kelley; but if you put him in the ring with someone just as fast as him and as powerful and vicious as Manny.....Lights out. Hamed would fight back and would land some stout stuff...who knows, he might even hurt Manny; but attitude is everything and Pacquiao ****s Hamed in my opinion.


Pac by 6th round KO/TKO/retirement.

While Hamed WAS akward, you can't say Manny is the most sure-footed fighter out there. I don't think he'd teach Hamed a boxing lesson ala Barrera, instead, he'd slug it out and throw plenty of hooks. Without a jab, he's ****ed against Naz, because up close, he threw those weird punches that came from even weirder angles.

[Mr. Ryan]

While Hamed WAS akward, you can't say Manny is the most sure-footed fighter out there. I don't think he'd teach Hamed a boxing lesson ala Barrera, instead, he'd slug it out and throw plenty of hooks. Without a jab, he's ****ed against Naz, because up close, he threw those weird punches that came from even weirder angles.

Pacquiao jabs enough, I mean he sends every opponent into a defensive posture simply with the way he shoots his jab. I think he'd keep Hamed off balance with the jab, or atleast make him a defense-first fighter at that point.