Just because a fighter dominates his whole career doesn't mean...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CarminePersico
    Banned
    • May 2006
    • 337
    • 40
    • 0
    • 405

    #1

    Just because a fighter dominates his whole career doesn't mean...

    that he's a good boxer... no one wants to see that **** , people want to see blood sweat n tears ...that doesn't make you go down in history for beatin up everybody you fight...

    Remember Rocky 6 ? remember that part when Tarver went to talk to his old trainer ? ? ? and his trainer told him " when you find yourself, out of breath... and tired as hell yada yada yada ... then you get self respect.. well basically ... your fights dont mean a ****in thing if they are not competitive ...


    winky wins fights but he does it un-impressively ... the only fight winky has ever had that he was really really tested was against ... taylor ... I personally think he lost against shane mosley the 2nd time but whatever, taylor still tested him more...

    same with taylor


    this is why they should both move up to fight harder opponents ... no one wants to see a dominated fight with no knockouts ...
  • duffgun
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2006
    • 3354
    • 92
    • 0
    • 4,273

    #2
    Originally posted by CarminePersico
    that he's a good boxer... no one wants to see that **** , people want to see blood sweat n tears ...that doesn't make you go down in history for beatin up everybody you fight...

    Remember Rocky 6 ? remember that part when Tarver went to talk to his old trainer ? ? ? and his trainer told him " when you find yourself, out of breath... and tired as hell yada yada yada ... then you get self respect.. well basically ... your fights dont mean a ****in thing if they are not competitive ...


    winky wins fights but he does it un-impressively ... the only fight winky has ever had that he was really really tested was against ... taylor ... I personally think he lost against shane mosley the 2nd time but whatever, taylor still tested him more...

    same with taylor


    this is why they should both move up to fight harder opponents ... no one wants to see a dominated fight with no knockouts ...
    I take it your not Winky's biggest fan then.

    Comment

    • Welter_Skelter
      Resistance Is Futile
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 16453
      • 1,978
      • 2,287
      • 27,508

      #3
      Originally posted by CarminePersico
      that he's a good boxer... no one wants to see that **** , people want to see blood sweat n tears ...that doesn't make you go down in history for beatin up everybody you fight...

      Remember Rocky 6 ? remember that part when Tarver went to talk to his old trainer ? ? ? and his trainer told him " when you find yourself, out of breath... and tired as hell yada yada yada ... then you get self respect.. well basically ... your fights dont mean a ****in thing if they are not competitive ...


      winky wins fights but he does it un-impressively ... the only fight winky has ever had that he was really really tested was against ... taylor ... I personally think he lost against shane mosley the 2nd time but whatever, taylor still tested him more...

      same with taylor


      this is why they should both move up to fight harder opponents ... no one wants to see a dominated fight with no knockouts ...
      WOW I am NOT alone...

      Comment

      • DiegoFuego
        Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2005
        • 17338
        • 1,403
        • 586
        • 24,657

        #4
        it's not your fault if you're that much better than your opponents. the only reason Mason Dixon didn't KO Rocky in the 2nd round was because he hurt his arm. it's not like it would have even been a fight lol.

        Comment

        • The Noose
          AKA Bologna Panini
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2004
          • 12082
          • 1,040
          • 825
          • 44,455

          #5
          Originally posted by CarminePersico
          ... no one wants to see a dominated fight with no knockouts ...
          Yes they do.

          Comment

          • CarminePersico
            Banned
            • May 2006
            • 337
            • 40
            • 0
            • 405

            #6
            mason dixon won all his fight by a long margin... mostly knockouts ...yes he got no respect ...until he had a competitive fight... and the point of him breaking his hand was to show that he had heart...


            trinidad vs vargas... is probably one of the best fights ever ... why ? because it was the most competitive...

            delahoya vs quartey - very competitive...




            mayweather vs gatti...worst one-sided fight i have ever seen... but it was entertaining because mayweather did it so well


            winky vs trinidad= boringest ****in boxing match i have ever seen in my life... i would never watch this **** again...lol but he dominated right? ? ? lol

            Comment

            • Deeznuts
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 4819
              • 186
              • 68
              • 11,929

              #7
              the only reason Mason Dixon didn't KO Rocky in the 2nd round was because he hurt his arm. it's not like it would have even been a fight lol.
              The only reason Rocky didn't get KO'd is because it wasn't in the script. BTW I understand why you say that about Winky but Taylor? Taylor was knocking opponents out or stopping them until Bernard which no-one ever stopped, then Winky, then Ouma but these fighters neve been stopped. Taylor is a riskier fighter and more exciting IMO.

              Comment

              • DiegoFuego
                Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2005
                • 17338
                • 1,403
                • 586
                • 24,657

                #8
                being entertaining and being good are two different things. Gatti would be an elite fighter if you based accomplishment on entertainment lol

                Comment

                • Phantasm
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 1497
                  • 67
                  • 33
                  • 7,978

                  #9
                  What are you talking about? If what you say is true, then you are not a TRUE boxing fan. Sure, everyone loves a blood and guts affair, but true fans will also love a sweet boxing clinic or a perfect style matchup.

                  Comment

                  • CarminePersico
                    Banned
                    • May 2006
                    • 337
                    • 40
                    • 0
                    • 405

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Phantasm
                    What are you talking about? If what you say is true, then you are not a TRUE boxing fan. Sure, everyone loves a blood and guts affair, but true fans will also love a sweet boxing clinic or a perfect style matchup.


                    lol i hate mutha****as that say "your not a boxing fan" because of this and because of that ... lol ... a weak fight is a weak fight, a wack fighter is a wack fighter.. just because i dont like something im not a TRUE FAN??? thats ignorant as **** ...

                    i like the zahir raheem fight when he fought morrales and schooled him , that **** was entertaining ... and it was a technical shut out ...

                    ummmmmmmm

                    winky vs trinidad was boring and everybody knows it ...so im not a true fan because i didnt find this **** entertaining???... you sound ****in ****** man...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP