IF Collazo beats Sugar Shane..........
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
OK, lets set this straight. I make post and support my thoughts with logic, facts and yes opinnions. You post pure hyperbole and oppinion.
Who needs help.....hmmm, is it the guy who tries to link every thread to Chris Eubank in some way (Geoff's six degrees of Eubank Separation). You also consistently have consequitive post in the same threads in which you actually quote yourself and appear to be attempting to add validity to your arguements by simply quoting yourself
I bet if there was a poll and people were asked what style of fighter Hatton was, everyone BUT you would say pressure/swarmer fighter. So would that mean that everyone is crazy but you
Comment
-
It is possible to be a pressure fighter / swarmer and still use boxing skills to win fights. Hatton isn't really a swarmer in the sense that he's a volume puncher. His output is not significantly higher than most fighters for his weight class. He wears down his opponents by being constantly there and constantly attacking, not necessarily by throwing outrageous amounts of punches. Hatton uses pressure but he also boxes intelligently (the last three fights aside) by stepping to the side and then swooping in, by attacking from angles etc. If you believe that boxing is the left jab, and anyone who neglects it can't box then you're missing out on a massive part of the fight game.Ok, I'm mentally ill because I claim that Hatton is not a great boxer and is actually a pressure fighter/swarmer. Please your really very obtuse and close minded when it comes to many UK fighters.Comment
-
You really think I'm going to waste my time with a psychopath? I'm not giving you what you want. I'm not going to feed you.OK, lets set this straight. I make post and support my thoughts with logic, facts and yes opinnions. You post pure hyperbole and oppinion.
Who needs help.....hmmm, is it the guy who tries to link every thread to Chris Eubank in some way (Geoff's six degrees of Eubank Separation). You also consistently have consequitive post in the same threads in which you actually quote yourself and appear to be attempting to add validity to your arguements by simply quoting yourself
I bet if there was a poll and people were asked what style of fighter Hatton was, everyone BUT you would say pressure/swarmer fighter. So would that mean that everyone is crazy but you
Comment
-
I agree, but Geoff does claim Hatton has this mythical great jab and when someone disagree's he calls them an idiot psychopath......etc.It is possible to be a pressure fighter / swarmer and still use boxing skills to win fights. Hatton isn't really a swarmer in the sense that he's a volume puncher. His output is not significantly higher than most fighters for his weight class. He wears down his opponents by being constantly there and constantly attacking, not necessarily by throwing outrageous amounts of punches. Hatton uses pressure but he also boxes intelligently (the last three fights aside) by stepping to the side and then swooping in, by attacking from angles etc. If you believe that boxing is the left jab, and anyone who neglects it can't box then you're missing out on a massive part of the fight game.
Now would you concede that your boy Geoff is dillusional?Comment
-
What the hell are you talking about??
Man, you really do need help. I'm just not going to feed you anymore.Comment
-
Mosley's fought southpaws before I beleive but no one as crafty as Collazo considering this Mosley doesn't have much sugar left and it may come down to an sneaky SD or a UD in favor of Collazo. If Hatton even thinks about coming back up people will accuse him of ducking Collazo even more after he went directly back down. I think he should have to have a rematch with Collazo if Collazo wins tommorrow to show he can leave people without being as doubtful as they already are.Comment
Comment