The Briggs who lost to Foreman and Lewis is actually better than the 2007 version I feel. The old Shannon with his higher workrate and slightly bigger set of balls would be a legitimate (though inconsistent) threat to most of the top heavyweights, but the 270 lb. Briggs of today is a joke. He beat a pathetic looking Sergei in the least possible impressive KO as allowed by the rules of boxing (trailing in points, hadn't done **** all until then, displayed horrible stamina, stoppage of fight was controversial and it can be argued that the bell should have won before Sergei was stopped etc) and now everyone is riding his bandwagon like he's been a consistent top fighter these last few years.
Briggs has been feasting on journeymen for YEARS. He rose from obscurity to grab the brass ring, and I'll give him that, but his grip on it is tenuous to say the least.
He looked AWFUL in that fight. What was it, 10-15 punches per round on average?
Briggs is gonna get demolished.
And no offense to you, a guy who I often see eye to eye with, but I have to respectfully disagree in this case. Briggs does not impress me one iota.
Briggs has been feasting on journeymen for YEARS. He rose from obscurity to grab the brass ring, and I'll give him that, but his grip on it is tenuous to say the least.
He looked AWFUL in that fight. What was it, 10-15 punches per round on average?
Briggs is gonna get demolished.
And no offense to you, a guy who I often see eye to eye with, but I have to respectfully disagree in this case. Briggs does not impress me one iota.
Comment