Where do you have Jermain Taylor in the P4P List?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brownpimp88
    Mike Tyson the Third
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 1552
    • 36
    • 1
    • 7,865

    #81
    mayweather and pac. These fools dont know how to judge fights, taylor definetly won the 2nd fight. I guarantee when these morons watch the fight, they try thier best to give as many rounds to b-hop as possible.

    The guy on the top of the page asks who taylor beat before b-hop, well lets see. He beat joppy, the funny thing is that joppy is the 2nd best guy b-hop beat between 2002-2005. He beat marquez, who is better than eastman, hakkar, allen. Taylor haters make me laugh.

    Comment

    • ben41193
      my pee pee hurts
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2006
      • 2937
      • 142
      • 209
      • 10,299

      #82
      He deserves a spot in the top 10. He beat hopkins twice and fought to a draw with number 2 p4p winky wright. So he defanatly deserves a spot in the top 10 probably around number 8 or 9

      Comment

      • wmute
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 8084
        • 289
        • 446
        • 15,158

        #83
        Originally posted by brownpimp88
        mayweather and pac. These fools dont know how to judge fights, taylor definetly won the 2nd fight. I guarantee when these morons watch the fight, they try thier best to give as many rounds to b-hop as possible.

        The guy on the top of the page asks who taylor beat before b-hop, well lets see. He beat joppy, the funny thing is that joppy is the 2nd best guy b-hop beat between 2002-2005. He beat marquez, who is better than eastman, hakkar, allen. Taylor haters make me laugh.
        since taylor-wright was a draw and wright is naturally smaller shouldnt wright be above taylor pound for pound?

        yes taylor won the second fight with hopkins.

        but marquez (a 33 years old junior middle, who was never a contender at middle), and joppy (at 34 and inactive for one year after fighting hopkins) are not beter than eastman, hakkar, allen, and a younger joppy (joppy did not fight for one year after fighting hopkins). In fact both hopkins and taylor's competition ****** ass if you ask me.

        as a sidenote when hopkins failed to stop joppy (who was inactive for a year also before fighting hopkins, and was damaged goods after tito IMO) and Allen (who he had already stopped!!), i knew he started slipping. and when he took half the fight off with eastman, he was no longer p4p #1 for me, as it was clear that if there was another very good MW around Hopkins' reign would come to an end.

        Taylors is definitely not a great middleweight, but he had the one thing that would trouble hopkins: youth.

        Comment

        • brownpimp88
          Mike Tyson the Third
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 1552
          • 36
          • 1
          • 7,865

          #84
          Originally posted by wmute
          since taylor-wright was a draw and wright is naturally smaller shouldnt wright be above taylor pound for pound?

          yes taylor won the second fight with hopkins.

          but marquez (a 33 years old junior middle, who was never a contender at middle), and joppy (at 34 and inactive for one year after fighting hopkins) are not beter than eastman, hakkar, allen, and a younger joppy (joppy did not fight for one year after fighting hopkins). In fact both hopkins and taylor's competition ****** ass if you ask me.

          as a sidenote when hopkins failed to stop joppy (who was inactive for a year also before fighting hopkins, and was damaged goods after tito IMO) and Allen (who he had already stopped!!), i knew he started slipping. and when he took half the fight off with eastman, he was no longer p4p #1 for me, as it was clear that if there was another very good MW around Hopkins' reign would come to an end.

          Taylors is definitely not a great middleweight, but he had the one thing that would trouble hopkins: youth.
          Dude name 1 guy that has fought better comp within thier first 27 fights. I dont really consider winky that much smaller cuz to me going from 154 to 160 is only half a weight class. If you go from 147 to 160, now thats 1 full weight class, do u get it.

          B-hop, winky, ouma, joppy and marquez are pretty good names for a resume with 27 fights.

          Comment

          • Vanilla Gorilla
            The Devils Advocate
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jul 2006
            • 761
            • 74
            • 30
            • 7,596

            #85
            He's not on my top 10. He actually came in around 12th.

            Comment

            • wmute
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2003
              • 8084
              • 289
              • 446
              • 15,158

              #86
              Originally posted by brownpimp88
              Dude name 1 guy that has fought better comp within thier first 27 fights. I dont really consider winky that much smaller cuz to me going from 154 to 160 is only half a weight class. If you go from 147 to 160, now thats 1 full weight class, do u get it.

              B-hop, winky, ouma, joppy and marquez are pretty good names for a resume with 27 fights.
              winky is smaller period. he had been fighting at 154 into his 30s. Taylor is a huge middleweight. given the draw, the smaller man is better p4p, even if the difference is only 6 pounds (and it was more than that, i believe).

              i have no problem in stating that fighting hopkins,hopkins,wright in sequence is amazing competition, but taylor looked like ****, even in the fight in which he did better: hop 2.

              But this has nothing to do with what you wrote in your previous post, in which you stated that fighting joppy and marquez was better than what hopkins fought in the same years

              and mind hopkins was 40, and winky was a smaller man. if you want to see good resumes AND good performances in 27 fights check out oscar de la hoya or floyd mayweather.

              Comment

              • brownpimp88
                Mike Tyson the Third
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2006
                • 1552
                • 36
                • 1
                • 7,865

                #87
                Originally posted by wmute
                winky is smaller period. he had been fighting at 154 into his 30s. Taylor is a huge middleweight. given the draw, the smaller man is better p4p, even if the difference is only 6 pounds (and it was more than that, i believe).

                i have no problem in stating that fighting hopkins,hopkins,wright in sequence is amazing competition, but taylor looked like ****, even in the fight in which he did better: hop 2.

                But this has nothing to do with what you wrote in your previous post, in which you stated that fighting joppy and marquez was better than what hopkins fought in the same years

                and mind hopkins was 40, and winky was a smaller man. if you want to see good resumes AND good performances in 27 fights check out oscar de la hoya or floyd mayweather.
                You cant use the b-hop is 40 excuse cuz he started his career at a later age. Remember he didnt become a big star till he turned 36.

                Comment

                • wmute
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 8084
                  • 289
                  • 446
                  • 15,158

                  #88
                  Originally posted by brownpimp88
                  You cant use the b-hop is 40 excuse cuz he started his career at a later age. Remember he didnt become a big star till he turned 36.
                  what the hell?

                  you know boxin

                  if you have seen hopkins fight

                  then you have seen him slipping against joppy, allen and eastman.

                  Comment

                  • brownpimp88
                    Mike Tyson the Third
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 1552
                    • 36
                    • 1
                    • 7,865

                    #89
                    Originally posted by wmute
                    what the hell?

                    you know boxin

                    if you have seen hopkins fight

                    then you have seen him slipping against joppy, allen and eastman.
                    yeah but thats when he was #1 pound for pound, it makes no sense trying to downplay taylor's win. Remember, when b-hop beat oscar, he leaped into immortality.

                    Comment

                    • wmute
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 8084
                      • 289
                      • 446
                      • 15,158

                      #90
                      Originally posted by brownpimp88
                      yeah but thats when he was #1 pound for pound, it makes no sense trying to downplay taylor's win. Remember, when b-hop beat oscar, he leaped into immortality.
                      are you for real?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP