Calzaghe aims at Hopkins' record!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #81
    Here's more food for thought:

    How the **** is Joe Calzaghe going to break Bernard Hopkins "Middleweight" defense record, at Super Middleweight?


    Hopkins record stands at Middleweight.

    The All time defense record, with no division in specific, is 25 defenses, set by Joe Louis at Heavyweight.

    So there's another "What the **** is the point of all this" when the whole thing is based on a stat he can't possibly equal because he's not in the same division to do so.

    There is just so much wrong with this story, it's comical.

    Comment

    • !!! Beowulf !!!
      What's the time Mr. Wolf?
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 3346
      • 803
      • 1,658
      • 14,425

      #82
      Originally posted by Bozo_no no
      Here's more food for thought:

      How the **** is Joe Calzaghe going to break Bernard Hopkins "Middleweight" defense record, at Super Middleweight?


      Hopkins record stands at Middleweight.

      The All time defense record, with no division in specific, is 25 defenses, set by Joe Louis at Heavyweight.

      So there's another "What the **** is the point of all this" when the whole thing is based on a stat he can't possibly equal because he's not in the same division to do so.

      There is just so much wrong with this story, it's comical.

      I'm not Bozo's biggest fan, but he is **** on here.

      Comment

      • FeelTheA-Force
        Banned
        • Mar 2006
        • 6165
        • 731
        • 3,113
        • 6,954

        #83
        Originally posted by Bozo_no no
        Here's more food for thought:

        How the **** is Joe Calzaghe going to break Bernard Hopkins "Middleweight" defense record, at Super Middleweight?


        Hopkins record stands at Middleweight.

        The All time defense record, with no division in specific, is 25 defenses, set by Joe Louis at Heavyweight.

        So there's another "What the **** is the point of all this" when the whole thing is based on a stat he can't possibly equal because he's not in the same division to do so.

        There is just so much wrong with this story, it's comical.
        yes your rite its all about the stats.. and calzaghe OWNED lacy... enjoy it accept it..

        Comment

        • Shanus
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 14918
          • 997
          • 1,217
          • 18,545

          #84
          Originally posted by Bozo_no no
          Here's more food for thought:

          How the **** is Joe Calzaghe going to break Bernard Hopkins "Middleweight" defense record, at Super Middleweight?


          Hopkins record stands at Middleweight.

          The All time defense record, with no division in specific, is 25 defenses, set by Joe Louis at Heavyweight.

          So there's another "What the **** is the point of all this" when the whole thing is based on a stat he can't possibly equal because he's not in the same division to do so.

          There is just so much wrong with this story, it's comical.

          It's still beating Bernards record of defenses, but I know what you mean.

          Comment

          • SHB
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2006
            • 1895
            • 75
            • 28
            • 8,086

            #85
            Originally posted by !!! Beowulf !!!
            I'm not Bozo's biggest fan, but he is **** on here.
            He would be if it was a different sport but it isn't. Still, given Hopkins' comments lately about trying to stop him it still means a fair bit to him.

            Records don't mean anything close to what they use to though. Nobody could compare Hopkins or Calzaghe's records to Joe Louis' given the fractous nature of "the business" these days. Records do prove that both were/are the kings of their weights during their tenure but that's about it.

            Bozo's right that Hopkins' resume is superior to Calzaghe's though. If the plans come together it looks like the latter will have the chance at least to make it even at least.

            Comment

            • Smashing
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 431
              • 11
              • 0
              • 6,729

              #86
              Hopkins resume is better than Calzones....but Joe is still active and potentially can out do Hopkins...but by fighting more credible opponents...this is what everyone wants.

              Comment

              • SHB
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2006
                • 1895
                • 75
                • 28
                • 8,086

                #87
                Originally posted by Smashing
                Hopkins resume is better than Calzones....but Joe is still active and potentially can out do Hopkins...but by fighting more credible opponents...this is what everyone wants.
                It's pretty much nailed on he's fighting Taylor in 2007 and possibly even Hopkins should the Maskaev fight fall through. That'd be great by anyone's measure.

                Comment

                • Shanus
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 14918
                  • 997
                  • 1,217
                  • 18,545

                  #88
                  The Hopkins/Maskaev fight is pointless, Hopkins would go in as the favourite anyhow.

                  Comment

                  • SHB
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 1895
                    • 75
                    • 28
                    • 8,086

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Shanus
                    The Hopkins/Maskaev fight is pointless, Hopkins would go in as the favourite anyhow.
                    I can quite understand Hopkins being more interested in fighting for the HW title. Imagine in 40 years time when he's a scrawny old little man and he can tell the grandkids how he won a heavyweight title. Being beaten from pillar to posty by some valley type doesn't quite have the same ring.

                    Comment

                    • Smashing
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 431
                      • 11
                      • 0
                      • 6,729

                      #90
                      good point that SHB made..its about history now

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP