Maybe Castillo-Corrales is a more apt example to illustrate my point. But then, that was a championship fight and, if not for the weight fiascos, would have been a championship fight on two more occasions.
Anyone with a hint of knowledge knew what kind of affair Castillo-Corrales would be; yet less than 5000 people turn up to see it.
To me, the Gatti-Ward fights didn't mean anything. Could you honestly say after the rematch that there was a need for the third fight? What did Gatti have to do, kill Ward to prove that he was the superior fighter?
I understand the logic behind the fighters should take what's on the table because that's what they signed up for as fighters, but what gets me is that it isn't on the table until the networks are sure they're getting their pound of flesh.
Look how quickly they tore Castillo up when he didn't make weight. He was a hero one minute, then a bastard the moment the fight was off.
The hypocrisy just stinks.
I mean, Gatti and Ward probably made decent money, but the industry itself devalues the contributions of those guys so much over the years that they shouldn't have had to almost kill each other three consecutive times. It felt like - "Hey, let's just have these two go at each other and see what happens; see how far they can push each other. Why? Because we can."
Look at Gatti, the most entertaining fighter maybe of the last ten years - provided value for money whether he was fighting Wilson Rodriguez, Erik Jakubowski or Carlos Baldomir. He fought everyone.
You see fighters that have made a lot less contributions than Gatti to boxing that don't have to do what he had to do because their money was already made.
Anyone with a hint of knowledge knew what kind of affair Castillo-Corrales would be; yet less than 5000 people turn up to see it.
To me, the Gatti-Ward fights didn't mean anything. Could you honestly say after the rematch that there was a need for the third fight? What did Gatti have to do, kill Ward to prove that he was the superior fighter?
I understand the logic behind the fighters should take what's on the table because that's what they signed up for as fighters, but what gets me is that it isn't on the table until the networks are sure they're getting their pound of flesh.
Look how quickly they tore Castillo up when he didn't make weight. He was a hero one minute, then a bastard the moment the fight was off.
The hypocrisy just stinks.
I mean, Gatti and Ward probably made decent money, but the industry itself devalues the contributions of those guys so much over the years that they shouldn't have had to almost kill each other three consecutive times. It felt like - "Hey, let's just have these two go at each other and see what happens; see how far they can push each other. Why? Because we can."
Look at Gatti, the most entertaining fighter maybe of the last ten years - provided value for money whether he was fighting Wilson Rodriguez, Erik Jakubowski or Carlos Baldomir. He fought everyone.
You see fighters that have made a lot less contributions than Gatti to boxing that don't have to do what he had to do because their money was already made.
Comment