Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comment




    • Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

      He pu$$ied out.

      The biatch pu$$ied out.

      It's over.

      Flawless victory.





















      [img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

      KABOOM!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Vadrigar. View Post


        Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

        He pu$$ied out.

        The biatch pu$$ied out.

        It's over.

        Flawless victory.





















        [img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

        KABOOM!


        Look at Travestyny GO in his natural habitat

        QUACK!!!!


        Comment


        • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          Look at Travestyny GO in his natural habitat

          QUACK!!!!





          SAYS THE BlTCH WHO REFUSED A REMATCH BECAUSE HE DOUBTS POSTERS HERE CAN UNDERSTAND THE TOPIC.....


          YET HE BELIEVES POSTERS HERE CAN UNDERSTAND HIS VAGUE TOPIC....


          YET HE WOULDN'T ACCEPT HIS OWN BEST FRIEND SPOON'S PROPOSAL BECAUSE HE CLAIMS IT WAS VAGUE


          So tell me, ADP.......if you think the judges would have no problem understanding about EPO testing with your vague topic....why don't you get these same judges to understand the topic of our rematch. Is it because...YOU ARE SCARED AND DUCKING THAT REMATCH HARD!


          Yea you are, pvssy. Yea you are. That's why that 4-0 stands and you're forever my bltch

          Comment


          • Let me expose you a little more. I can't resist

            CLAIMED HE WANTED A RECOUNT. DECLINED IMMEDIATELY AFTER.

            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            Can we now have a recount?

            Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges

            .

            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Come on, ADP. Should I send a message to the mod to get approval of the permaban bet? Put your account where your mouth is! I’m waitinggggg!!!!
            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            If you're so sure, then why don't you accept the new challenge, ADP02? I've been waiting for about a week.

            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Come back, ADP. I know you're going to duck getting decapitated a second time, zombie boy
            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            Unfortunately, I do not think that you can get any objective experts. So there is no point asking.
            DUCK DUCK DUCK DUCK DUCK!!!!!! LMAO


            Oh....but that's not all!

            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post

            As I said, I would accept any bet on .....

            the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!! and have explained what I mean already.
            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test
            ADP DECLINED!

            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.
            ADP DECLINED

            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.
            ADP DECLINED

            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!
            ADP DECLINED


            CHEW ON THAT, SON. GIVE ME THE POINTS THAT YOU OWE. IT'S OVER. NO MORE ATTENTION FOR A BlTCH LIKE YOU WHO JUST WANTS TO CRY AND CRY BUT DOESN'T WAN TO ACCEPT ANY CHALLENGE EXCEPT SOME VAGUE BULLSHlT THAT YOU HOPE YOU CAN MANIPULATE THAT ISN'T EVEN RELATED TO OUR DEBATE, BUT YOU CLAIM IT IS.....BUT YOU RUN FOR THE HILLS WHEN I SAY, OK, THEN PART OF YOUR PROOF IS TO SHOW HOW IT'S RELATED. YOU KNOW WHAT'S UP, PVSSY!


            You're stuck in the grave and you can't get out. Bye bye, bltch!

            R.I.P.

            Comment


            • ****** right now:

              Comment


              • Vadrigar back then.


                PLEASE HELPPPPP!!!!





                21 of his last 25 posts have been about me!!!! And all because I did this to him.


                January 2018
                Originally posted by Vadrigar. View Post
                Floyd was a coward who ducked Khan.

                Deal with it.




                April 29th, 2014
                Originally posted by Vadrigar. View Post
                If he beats Collazo in the flat and lackluster way he beat Julio Diaz, then no.
                I don't see how they could sell the fight.


                What could they possibly show as a recent highlight reel of Khan on All Access?

                At least Maidana had beaten Broner in emphatic fashion, which generates some interest.
                [img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]
                Last edited by travestyny; 08-19-2018, 05:09 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  Let me expose you a little more. I can't resist

                  CLAIMED HE WANTED A RECOUNT. DECLINED IMMEDIATELY AFTER.

                  So what Travestyny is saying is that he found about 10 posts where he admitted to SQUIRMING AWAY from my CHALLENGE. My CHALLENGE for him was based on a topic where he used the same statements to DUPE judges!!!!

                  He was bragging and argued with me for 2 months!!! No more bragging after my CHALLENGE!!!!

                  AFTER that, it was DUCK here, DUCK there, DUCK everywhere Travestyny can DUCK!!!!






                  Travestyny, YOU ARE WRONG!!!




                  You tried to SQUIRM MORE THAN THAT, DUCK BOY!!!!

                  Now go find the other times that you tried to SQUIRM AWAY from the CHALLENGE!!!!




                  Travestyny, the DUCK!!!!



                  QUACK!!!!!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    he used the same statements to DUPE judges!!!!

                    [B][COLOR="Red"]He was bragging and argued with me for 2 months!!! [COLOR="Blue"]No more bragging after my CHALLENGE!!!!
                    LMAOOOOO. I BEEN BRAGGING THIS ENTIRE TIME ABOUT YOU SAYING I DUPED THE JUDGES, BUT YOU TUCK TAIL AND **** YOUR PANTS EVERY TIME I MENTION REMATCH.


                    BECAUSE YOU'RE MY BlTCH. LMAOOOOOO. YOU KNOW IT AND I KNOW IT. STAY IN YOUR LANE, LlTTLE PUP. EVERYONE KNOWS YOU DUCKED THAT REMATCH BECAUSE YOU KNOW YOU LOST AND NOW YOUR DESPERATION IS ABOUT A VAGUE STATEMENT THAT HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH OUR OLD DEBATE.

                    CANNNNN.....CANNNNNN. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!


                    CANNN ADP STOP BEING A BlTCH. NEGATIVE.

                    THE FUNNIEST PART, BESIDES YOU EVEN DUCKING YOUR BEST FRIEND SPOON'S PROPOSAL, IS IF I DUCKED YOU BECAUSE YOUR TOPIC IS VAGUE......THEN HOW THE FVVCK COULD YOU TURN AROUND AND DECLINE A CHALLENGE BECAUSE YOU CLAIM IT WAS VAGUE. ESPECIALY WHEN THE PROPOSAL CAME FROM SPOON23, WHO IS YOUR BEST FRIEND HERE.

                    THAT'S LIKE PACQUIAO DECLINING BUBOY'S PROPOSAL TO MAYWEATHER FOR A REMATCH. LMAOOOOOO. THAT SHOWS EXACTLY WHO THE DVCCKER AND THE PVSSY IS DOESN'T IT. YEP, IT SURE DOES!


                    SO IF I DUCKED YOU BECAUSE I SAID YOUR PROPOSAL IS TOO VAGUE...THEN DID YOU DUCK BECAUSE YOU SAID THE PROPOSAL FROM YORU BEST FRIEND THAT I ACCEPTED WAS TOO VAGUE. ANSWER THE QUESTION BlTCH. LET'S SEE WHO IS ALLOWED TO DECLINE VAGUE CHALLENGES AND WHO ISN'T. OBVIOUSLY SPOON THOUGHT IT WAS A FAIR CHALLENGE...AND YOU KEPT PANDERING TO HIM. WHEN WHY DID YOU DECLINE HIS CHALLENGE.



                    EXPOSED YOU DUCKING BlTCH. I CALL IT THE SPOON23 CHALLENGE. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

                    [img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

                    R.I.P. BlTCH!!!!!


                    PLUS YOU DUCKKED THE REMATCH!!!! BAHAHAHAHAHAHA. SO WHO IS THE DUCK, SON! YEAAAAAA. I THOUGHT SO!


                    ADP, the DUCK!!!!



                    QUACK!!!!!

                    Last edited by travestyny; 08-19-2018, 10:21 PM.

                    Comment


                    • EXPOSED!


                      DUCKING WHAT HE SPECIFICALLY SAID HE WOULD ACCEPT!

                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      As I said, I would accept any bet on .....

                      the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!!
                      ANY BET ON THAT HUH? LMAOOOOOO. IN REALITY....


                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.
                      ADP DECLINED

                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test
                      ADP DECLINED!

                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.
                      ADP DECLINED

                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.
                      ADP DECLINED

                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!
                      ADP DECLINED

                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      Just agree to the challenge.

                      So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

                      Yes or no?
                      ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!




                      EXPOSED!


                      DUCKING THE Rematch????

                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      Can we now have a recount?

                      Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges

                      .
                      OH YOU WANT A RECOUNT. NO YOU DON'T. IN ACTUALITY...


                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.
                      Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?
                      But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?
                      Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      there is no point asking.
                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

                      That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?
                      ADP DECLINED




                      EXPOSED!


                      REMATCH MEDIATED BY HIS BEST FRIEND SPOON???? HE WILL SURELY ACCEPT, RIGHT? I DID!

                      Originally posted by spoon23 View Post
                      this is a new case. It's only the premise that is the same. All facts from the old kangaroo court is not admissible to court. You can present those facts again to the new judges, but is not accepted as truths. Only the new judges will decide if it is.

                      New judges will look at facts presented in a new light.
                      Originally posted by spoon23 View Post
                      if it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??

                      Originally posted by spoon23 View Post
                      don't forget the most important part that you agreed on travesty.

                      in that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using epo, it can be used.

                      any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the new judges deem it to.
                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      i accept.
                      BUT NOT ADP. IN ACTUALITY....


                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      DO YOU ACCEPT THE REMATCH OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!
                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      NO!!!
                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

                      EXPOSED!


                      Ducking his own challenge!

                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      I'll tell you what.


                      Pay your debt from the last debate and admit that you lost.


                      I'll accept your challenge for permanent ban and all points.


                      Deal?
                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      NOPE ...
                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      [SIZE="4"]

                      THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


                      Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!

                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      Let's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.

                      CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!
                      Originally posted by ADP02
                      THIS IS NOT THE CHALLENGE THAT I REQUESTED!!!!!
                      BUT HIS QUOTATIONS ON THE MATTER SAY IT WAS EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS REQUESTING. LMAOOOO!

                      AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, THIS FOOL WAS JUST SAYING NO! BECAUSE HE'S A SCARED ****LESS DUCK!



                      THIS BlTCH DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING...AND THAT'S WHY HE GOT NOTHING. LMAOOOOO. NOW HE WILL FOREVER BE A 4-0 LOSING BlTCH. IT'S OVER PVSSY. PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE AND SHUT THE FVVCK UP!




                      4-0!!!!!!


                      https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888


                      [img]https://media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

                      ....but ADP02 STILL LIKE....



                      ADP, the 4-0 LOSING DUCK!!!!



                      QUACK!!!!!

                      Last edited by travestyny; 08-19-2018, 11:08 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP