
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Vadrigar. View Post
Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.
He pu$$ied out.
The biatch pu$$ied out.
It's over.
Flawless victory.
[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]
KABOOM!
Look at Travestyny GO in his natural habitat
QUACK!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostLook at Travestyny GO in his natural habitat
QUACK!!!!
SAYS THE BlTCH WHO REFUSED A REMATCH BECAUSE HE DOUBTS POSTERS HERE CAN UNDERSTAND THE TOPIC.....
YET HE BELIEVES POSTERS HERE CAN UNDERSTAND HIS VAGUE TOPIC....
YET HE WOULDN'T ACCEPT HIS OWN BEST FRIEND SPOON'S PROPOSAL BECAUSE HE CLAIMS IT WAS VAGUE
So tell me, ADP.......if you think the judges would have no problem understanding about EPO testing with your vague topic....why don't you get these same judges to understand the topic of our rematch. Is it because...YOU ARE SCARED AND DUCKING THAT REMATCH HARD!
Yea you are, pvssy. Yea you are. That's why that 4-0 stands and you're forever my bltch
Comment
-
Let me expose you a little more. I can't resist
CLAIMED HE WANTED A RECOUNT. DECLINED IMMEDIATELY AFTER.
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostCan we now have a recount?
Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges
.
Originally posted by travestyny View PostCome on, ADP. Should I send a message to the mod to get approval of the permaban bet? Put your account where your mouth is! I’m waitinggggg!!!!Originally posted by travestyny View PostIf you're so sure, then why don't you accept the new challenge, ADP02? I've been waiting for about a week.
Originally posted by travestyny View PostCome back, ADP. I know you're going to duck getting decapitated a second time, zombie boyOriginally posted by ADP02 View PostUnfortunately, I do not think that you can get any objective experts. So there is no point asking.
Oh....but that's not all!
Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
As I said, I would accept any bet on .....
the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!! and have explained what I mean already.Originally posted by travestyny View PostYou could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test
Originally posted by travestyny View PostTOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.
Originally posted by travestyny View PostTopic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.
Originally posted by travestyny View PostTOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!
CHEW ON THAT, SON. GIVE ME THE POINTS THAT YOU OWE. IT'S OVER. NO MORE ATTENTION FOR A BlTCH LIKE YOU WHO JUST WANTS TO CRY AND CRY BUT DOESN'T WAN TO ACCEPT ANY CHALLENGE EXCEPT SOME VAGUE BULLSHlT THAT YOU HOPE YOU CAN MANIPULATE THAT ISN'T EVEN RELATED TO OUR DEBATE, BUT YOU CLAIM IT IS.....BUT YOU RUN FOR THE HILLS WHEN I SAY, OK, THEN PART OF YOUR PROOF IS TO SHOW HOW IT'S RELATED. YOU KNOW WHAT'S UP, PVSSY!
You're stuck in the grave and you can't get out. Bye bye, bltch!
R.I.P.
Comment
-
Vadrigar back then.
PLEASE HELPPPPP!!!!
21 of his last 25 posts have been about me!!!! And all because I did this to him.
January 2018
Originally posted by Vadrigar. View PostFloyd was a coward who ducked Khan.
Deal with it.
April 29th, 2014
Originally posted by Vadrigar. View PostIf he beats Collazo in the flat and lackluster way he beat Julio Diaz, then no.
I don't see how they could sell the fight.
What could they possibly show as a recent highlight reel of Khan on All Access?
At least Maidana had beaten Broner in emphatic fashion, which generates some interest.[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]Last edited by travestyny; 08-19-2018, 05:09 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostLet me expose you a little more. I can't resist
CLAIMED HE WANTED A RECOUNT. DECLINED IMMEDIATELY AFTER.
So what Travestyny is saying is that he found about 10 posts where he admitted to SQUIRMING AWAY from my CHALLENGE. My CHALLENGE for him was based on a topic where he used the same statements to DUPE judges!!!!
He was bragging and argued with me for 2 months!!! No more bragging after my CHALLENGE!!!!
AFTER that, it was DUCK here, DUCK there, DUCK everywhere Travestyny can DUCK!!!!
Travestyny, YOU ARE WRONG!!!
You tried to SQUIRM MORE THAN THAT, DUCK BOY!!!!
Now go find the other times that you tried to SQUIRM AWAY from the CHALLENGE!!!!
Travestyny, the DUCK!!!!
QUACK!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View Posthe used the same statements to DUPE judges!!!!
[B][COLOR="Red"]He was bragging and argued with me for 2 months!!! [COLOR="Blue"]No more bragging after my CHALLENGE!!!!
BECAUSE YOU'RE MY BlTCH. LMAOOOOOO. YOU KNOW IT AND I KNOW IT. STAY IN YOUR LANE, LlTTLE PUP. EVERYONE KNOWS YOU DUCKED THAT REMATCH BECAUSE YOU KNOW YOU LOST AND NOW YOUR DESPERATION IS ABOUT A VAGUE STATEMENT THAT HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH OUR OLD DEBATE.
CANNNNN.....CANNNNNN. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!
CANNN ADP STOP BEING A BlTCH. NEGATIVE.
THE FUNNIEST PART, BESIDES YOU EVEN DUCKING YOUR BEST FRIEND SPOON'S PROPOSAL, IS IF I DUCKED YOU BECAUSE YOUR TOPIC IS VAGUE......THEN HOW THE FVVCK COULD YOU TURN AROUND AND DECLINE A CHALLENGE BECAUSE YOU CLAIM IT WAS VAGUE. ESPECIALY WHEN THE PROPOSAL CAME FROM SPOON23, WHO IS YOUR BEST FRIEND HERE.
THAT'S LIKE PACQUIAO DECLINING BUBOY'S PROPOSAL TO MAYWEATHER FOR A REMATCH. LMAOOOOOO. THAT SHOWS EXACTLY WHO THE DVCCKER AND THE PVSSY IS DOESN'T IT. YEP, IT SURE DOES!
SO IF I DUCKED YOU BECAUSE I SAID YOUR PROPOSAL IS TOO VAGUE...THEN DID YOU DUCK BECAUSE YOU SAID THE PROPOSAL FROM YORU BEST FRIEND THAT I ACCEPTED WAS TOO VAGUE. ANSWER THE QUESTION BlTCH. LET'S SEE WHO IS ALLOWED TO DECLINE VAGUE CHALLENGES AND WHO ISN'T. OBVIOUSLY SPOON THOUGHT IT WAS A FAIR CHALLENGE...AND YOU KEPT PANDERING TO HIM. WHEN WHY DID YOU DECLINE HIS CHALLENGE.
EXPOSED YOU DUCKING BlTCH. I CALL IT THE SPOON23 CHALLENGE. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostI said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!
[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]
R.I.P. BlTCH!!!!!
PLUS YOU DUCKKED THE REMATCH!!!! BAHAHAHAHAHAHA. SO WHO IS THE DUCK, SON! YEAAAAAA. I THOUGHT SO!
ADP, the DUCK!!!!
QUACK!!!!!
Last edited by travestyny; 08-19-2018, 10:21 PM.
Comment
-
EXPOSED!
DUCKING WHAT HE SPECIFICALLY SAID HE WOULD ACCEPT!
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostAs I said, I would accept any bet on .....
the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!!ANY BET ON THAT HUH? LMAOOOOOO. IN REALITY....
Originally posted by travestyny View PostTopic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.
Originally posted by travestyny View PostYou could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test
Originally posted by travestyny View PostTOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.
Originally posted by travestyny View PostTOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.
Originally posted by travestyny View PostTOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!
Originally posted by travestyny View PostJust agree to the challenge.
So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.
Yes or no?
EXPOSED!
DUCKING THE Rematch????
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostCan we now have a recount?
Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges
.OH YOU WANT A RECOUNT. NO YOU DON'T. IN ACTUALITY...
Originally posted by travestyny View PostBy the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?
Originally posted by ADP02 View Postthere is no point asking.Originally posted by travestyny View PostWhat's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!
That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?
EXPOSED!
REMATCH MEDIATED BY HIS BEST FRIEND SPOON???? HE WILL SURELY ACCEPT, RIGHT? I DID!
Originally posted by spoon23 View Postthis is a new case. It's only the premise that is the same. All facts from the old kangaroo court is not admissible to court. You can present those facts again to the new judges, but is not accepted as truths. Only the new judges will decide if it is.
New judges will look at facts presented in a new light.Originally posted by spoon23 View Postif it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??
Originally posted by spoon23 View Postdon't forget the most important part that you agreed on travesty.
in that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using epo, it can be used.
any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the new judges deem it to.Originally posted by travestyny View Posti accept.BUT NOT ADP. IN ACTUALITY....
Originally posted by travestyny View PostDO YOU ACCEPT THE REMATCH OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!Originally posted by ADP02 View PostNO!!!Originally posted by ADP02 View PostI said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!
EXPOSED!
Ducking his own challenge!
Originally posted by travestyny View PostI'll tell you what.
Pay your debt from the last debate and admit that you lost.
I'll accept your challenge for permanent ban and all points.
Deal?Originally posted by ADP02 View PostNOPE ...Originally posted by ADP02 View Post[SIZE="4"]
THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE
Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!
Originally posted by travestyny View PostLet's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.
CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!Originally posted by ADP02THIS IS NOT THE CHALLENGE THAT I REQUESTED!!!!!
AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, THIS FOOL WAS JUST SAYING NO! BECAUSE HE'S A SCARED ****LESS DUCK!
THIS BlTCH DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING...AND THAT'S WHY HE GOT NOTHING. LMAOOOOO. NOW HE WILL FOREVER BE A 4-0 LOSING BlTCH. IT'S OVER PVSSY. PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE AND SHUT THE FVVCK UP!
4-0!!!!!!
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888
[img]https://media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]
....but ADP02 STILL LIKE....
ADP, the 4-0 LOSING DUCK!!!!
QUACK!!!!!
Last edited by travestyny; 08-19-2018, 11:08 PM.
Comment
Comment