Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[QueensburyRules]

--- Floyd vs Manny only relevant in March of 2010.

Everything subsequent just money grubbing posturing...the way it was...

[abracada]

Don't even try ShoulderRoll. You won't get it even if you try. What you should ask is why you love flaking out when you are failing to defend Froid Roid is what you should worry about. You have a lot on your plate to worry about other things and besides you tried a long time ago. You couldn't even get to first gear. Seriously, if you want to make sense. Don't flake off in a about. It only shows how much of a loser you are haha! It's over bruh. You had your shot. You fuvked up a long time ago for being a deserter for your cause. It's just the way it is..

Now it's time for you to reflect why you turned into a biatch and scooted off when the going gets tough.






Sorry bud, you weren't able to. You fuvked up. It's time for your meal now.



OR YOU CAN JUST HIDE IN SHAME HAHAHAHAHA











Da "shoulder roll"

Money May v Pac-Man best out of 3 fights. Only way to settle this.

[Spoon23]

Money May v Pac-Man best out of 3 fights. Only way to settle this.

That is a tall order especially coming from a boxer who loves to run and hug against Pacman. I think Floyd would rather be ***** than to step up and close this rivalry that has unfinished business written all over if.

Here's an education video about the Queensberry Rules of boxing.

What not to do in boxing:

Number 2 rule : NO wrestling or HUGGING allowed @ 0:39




Example of what is Foul in the Rules in Boxing.



The boos in every Floyd Mayweather hug caught in this footage only shows how boxing fans feel in their frustration of what is an example of what not to do in a super fight of this magnitude.

@1:15 - "Keep running Floyd. Keep running. You can do it!"

https://********/dz3a3XxsSDY

[travestyny]

Don't count on it bruh. Floyd will rather keep his fluke win which he barely won against an injured torn rotator, Pac, what more with a 2 armed Pac with a right hook pop. Floyd won't risk losing this time, he already did a Houdini with all that running and hugging.. He knows another one will be a tall order. He should just retire for good.

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[Spoon23]

[CENTER]

Don't count on it bruh. Floyd will rather keep his fluke win which he barely won against an injured torn rotator, Pac, what more with a 2 armed Pac with a right hook pop. Floyd won't risk losing this time, he already did a Houdini with all that running and hugging.. He knows another one will be a tall order. He should just retire for good.

Jeez, you're like CNN. You keep on spinning nothin burgers haha!! I definitely mentioned the word Fluke in that paragraph. Sorry, try again.

lolololol

Didn't I explain it to you already Travestyny? Oh right! I only said it to your ALT account Dosumpthin. I have to do the same to you because you are not one and the same person. Right! Gotcha.

Well, Nothing to spin here. Floyd did officially win in Nevada unless you're living under a rock??

But was it a FLUKE win as I have mentioned? As this epic thread has exposed.

YES IT IS!



[IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/IMG]

[travestyny]

I just want to take a moment to recognize Spoon for his attempt to turn over a new leaf.


I mean, he has actually been pretty damn honest recently. Even more honest than ADP02, who has proven to be a lying, welching scumbag.


I mean, why else would Spoon have responded to this post that I sent him the way that he did.

ADP has been talking about the scope of our debate in which he lost 4-0. One of his statements there proved to be relevant nowadays.

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

Funny thing is that ADP recently has been saying this is suddenly in scope. Hmmmmm. Well it's hard to argue that, being that the quotation was confirmed to be legit, even by him. So I wondered what Spoon had to say about this. I thought he would find some way to be as dishonest as ADP. NOPE! Check it out!

If it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??

LMAOOOO. WOWWWW. I HAVE TO ADMIT THAT I WAS FLABBERGASTED. SPOON STEPPING ON ADP'S NECK LIKE THAT AND ALL.

BUT NOT ONLY THAT!!!!!


I MEAN, AFTER ALL THE SHlT PUT OUT IN THIS THREAD, HE ALSO WAS HONEST ENOUGH TO FINALLY ADMIT THE TRUTH!!!!

Don't count on it bruh. Floyd will rather keep his fluke win which he barely won against an injured torn rotator, Pac, what more with a 2 armed Pac with a right hook pop. Floyd won't risk losing this time, he already did a Houdini with all that running and hugging.. He knows another one will be a tall order. He should just retire for good.

SAY WHAT????? SO SPOON BEING HONEST ABOUT ADP BEING A CHEATING SCUMBAG.....ANNDDDDDD SPOON BEING HONEST ABOUT MAYWEATHER WINNING THAT FIGHT!!!!??????


HE MIGHT BE A RAVING MAD MORON, BUT THE MAN HAS BEEN HONEST RECENTLY. THREE CHEERS FOR SPOON!!!! GREAT JOB, BUBOY. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!!!!!

[IMG]https://media2.*****.com/media/QMkPpxPDYY0fu/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[Gigantes]

lololol

Did I mention the word Fluke? Yes I did. Come on.. Get in the program.. You guys suck. You guys are like CNN twisting facts. You guys pick selective thoughts to fit your hole ridden narrative. Never mind.. You'll never get it. I gave you plenty of chances already. You fuvked up a long time ago. Game over for you.

I gave you countless of chances. You lost a long time ago I fuvked you up with all the facts. You ran and left lol Typical behaviour of losers, but It's okay. Those things happen. Sometimes you lose your identity after such a demoralising defeat that you had to change your name to SHyit FOr BRits, and now you have gotten back your bearings and a portion of your sanity. I hope. So I'm very happy that you now have embraced, your real calling,

SHOULDERROLL. ALLLLRRRRRIGGGGGHT!!!




You guys should take a hint..It's crystal clear if only you guys can open your eyes and stop being gullible fan girls.

A MESSAGE FROM FLOYD TO HIS FANS.

Straight from the horses mouth:

Floyd Mayweather: " I owe them for the Pacquiao fight "

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.637e6deb6c31

didn’t feel like looking through the thread for the video you posted of the woman beater *Floyd’s dad yelling at him for fighting scared, but was wondering, how is someone “dominating” a fight when their own dad is yelling u fighting scared

[Spoon23]

I just want to take a moment to recognize Spoon for his attempt to turn over a new leaf.

Nope. No turning over. You are just too dumb realise how a court works hahaha!!

Originally Posted by ADP02
2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.


Funny thing is that ADP recently has been saying this is suddenly in scope. Hmmmmm. Well it's hard to argue that, being that the quotation was confirmed to be legit, even by him. So I wondered what Spoon had to say about this. I thought he would find some way to be as dishonest as ADP. NOPE! Check it out!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoon23 View Post
If it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??



ADP02 CLEARLY mentions, however, In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.


Thus I, Spoon23 also mentioned. Any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the NEW JUDGES deem it to. And if the "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that ties the athlete was using EPO. Then it is relevant and very much admissable to court.

Why is it so hard to understand TravestyNY All you have to do is create a premise of the scope of your defence. You just choose your side. Simple. It's the Judges not you or ADP02 will decided if ADP02 or You Travesty have any relevant evidence to justify your argument. You just have to present your facts, In the end, since you don't get it. It's not ADP02 or you who will decide if your points have merit or not. Judges will decide that.

It's so simple, but it seems. All you do Travesty is biatch and move the goal post like your hero Froid Roid.

All you need to do is create the premise of the scope of your argument. IT IS THE JUDGES WHO WILL DECIDE IF IT IS OUT OF SCOPE OR NOT. NOT YOU! YOU NITWIT HAHAHAHAHA!!!