Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
    All you need to do is create the premise of the scope of your argument. IT IS THE JUDGES WHO WILL DECIDE IF IT IS OUT OF SCOPE OR NOT.

    EXACTLY. HAHAHAHAHA. YOU KEEP SHlTTING ALL OVER ADP02


    Go tell that to him so he stops ducking. Bahahahahaha!!!!

    You two are like dumb and dumber!!!!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      EXACTLY. HAHAHAHAHA. [/MENTION]


      Thus I, Spoon23 also mentioned. Any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the NEW JUDGES deem it to. And if the "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that ties the athlete was using EPO. Then it is relevant and very much admissable to court.

      Yes EXACTLY! But I'm not ****ting on my main man ADP02. I'm actually ****ting on your dumbass arguments that you have no idea where you are at anymore from all that spinning of unnecessary nonsense after nonsense that seems to never end lolololol

      Now its time to get on with this charade Travesty, unless. You are biatching out again hahaha!!


      DUCKER IN THE HOUSE!!!!!! PUT UP OR SHUT UP BIATCH HAHAHAHA


      Last edited by Spoon23; 08-10-2018, 12:20 AM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
        Yes EXACTLY! But I'm not ****ting on my main man ADP02. I'm actually ****ting on your dumbass arguments that you have no idea where you are at anymore from all that spinning of unnecessary nonsense after nonsense that seems to never end lolololol

        Now its time to get on with this charade Travesty, unless. You are biatching out again hahaha!!


        DUCKER IN THE HOUSE!!!!!! PUT UP OR SHUT UP BIATCH HAHAHAHA



        Oh, is it this one? That’s what your boy said a year ago. Ask him if he still believes this!!!!

        Originally posted by ADP02
        SCOPE that YOU agreed on: Does the EPO technical document refer to threshold criteria?
        STOP SHlTTING ALL OVER ADP. HE’S ALREADY DEAD!!!!


        [img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

        Comment


        • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
          Oh, is it this one? That’s what your boy said a year ago. Ask him if he still believes this!!!!
          Originally posted by travestyny View Post
          EXACTLY. HAHAHAHAHA. [/MENTION]


          Thus I, Spoon23 also mentioned. Any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the NEW JUDGES deem it to. And if the "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that ties the athlete was using EPO. Then it is relevant and very much admissable to court.


          It's sealed. You've agreed. It's time to walk the walk.


          EXACTLY


          [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/IMG]

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
            It's sealed. You've agreed. It's time to walk the walk.


            EXACTLY


            [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/IMG]
            Jesus Christ you are a dummy.

            Yep, I agreed. I told your boy he could use any additional information he wants!. Now get your boy to agree

            [img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]
            Last edited by travestyny; 08-10-2018, 04:45 AM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
              Jesus Christ you are a dummy.

              Yep, I agreed. I told your boy he could use any additional information he wants!. Now get your boy to agree
              lololololol

              You can't even define your argument.

              Like I said. I'm here to start the thread and post the Premise of each side and the rules of this debate. I won't be the judge, but I'll certainly be the one to create the guidelines of this debate.

              Stop yapping. And define your side. Write it down in the other thread. I'm already getting this in motion.

              All you do is make up silly, nonsense posturing. Move your biatch ass!


              [img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]
              Last edited by Spoon23; 08-10-2018, 05:51 AM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                lololololol

                You can't even define your argument.

                Like I said. I'm here to start the thread and post the Premise of each side and the rules of this debate. I won't be the judge, but I'll certainly be the one to create the guidelines of this debate.

                Stop yapping. And define your side. Write it down in the other thread. I'm already getting this in motion.

                All you do is make up silly, nonsense posturing. Move your biatch ass!


                [img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]


                NOPE. Don't think of bltching out.


                YOU ARE A PARTICIPATE AND I'M WAITING FOR YOU TO ACCEPT THE PERMANENT BAN, ALL POINTS BET!

                You wanted to be in....YOU GOT IT! THANKS FOR STEPPING UP.


                Let's see you defend all of the BLATANT LIES that I caught your boy in. I'm ready. I ACCEPT. Waiting for you to accept.


                DON'T YOU DARE THINK ABOUT BlTCHING OUT. ARE YOU IN OR NOT?

                Comment




                • Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

                  He pu$$ied out.

                  The biatch pu$$ied out.

                  It's over.

                  Flawless victory.





















                  [img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

                  KABOOM!

                  Comment


                  • Breaking News:
                    ADP02 bows out of rematch, essentially admitting to being the rightful loser -- still refuses to pay debt.

                    Spoon23 happy to escape going along for the imminent permanent ban. Lucky to escape with only destroying his life's work by admitting Mayweather beat Pacquiao.

                    Vagasil (aka PARALLELOGRAM VIAGRA), still a f@ggot.


                    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                    DO YOU ACCEPT OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!
                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    NO!!!

                    Did they just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes they did.

                    They pu$$ied out.

                    The biatches pu$$ied out.

                    It's over.

                    Flawless victory.





















                    [img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

                    KABOOM!

                    So long, bltches.


                    [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

                    Comment


                    • TIME TO GET THIS SHOW ON THE ROAD!!!



                      Originally posted by adp02 View Post
                      so does it appear that travestyny is ok with the scope and exclusions that were agreed?


                      travesty are you okay with this??


                      yes or no

                      "can or does epo testing have threshold type criteria?"

                      exclusions: only 1. Scope is not about whether epo is a threshold substance.

                      Also,

                      t/e ratio screening test - i had even provided to you multiple times including where you agreed this point.

                      are you ok with that point too?

                      yes or no


                      initial statements, i had a "note" to state that there are more tests and procedures concerning how epo is tested than what i have stated thus far. I will discuss that too once we start this debate.

                      are you ok with that too?

                      yes or no



                      you provided your statement that you found no talk of a "threshold" for epo testing in wada documents.

                      are you ok with that too?

                      yes or no



                      you stated that you looked at epo technical documents and anything and everything mentioned was in scope and game?

                      are you ok with that too?


                      yes or no




                      .
                      If you agree to all this Travesty.

                      Then there is no more reason to delay this any longer, unless you want to flake off again. It's game time!! Put up or shut up biatch!

                      Say Yes to agree with this terms. Then we are ready for a debate. And will get this show on the road.



                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP