Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

Discussion:
Who is right, Travestyny's comprehension or the WADA EXPERTs. Do not DEFLECT!!!! but you are the one that they call DEFLECTOR, so I know that you will not disappoint in your comeback, DEFLECTOR!!! LOL

I'll gladly answer this. THE WADA EXPERTS DON'T SAY THAT I'M WRONG BECAUSE THE ONLY THING THAT THEY HAVE EVER CALLED A THRESHOLD WAS THE BAP CRITERIA FROM 2003 THAT IS NO LONGER IN USE!!!!!


DO YOU DENY THIS, ADP?????

QUESTION: WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME THE BAP CRITERIA THAT YOU HAVE BEEN REFERRING TO USED? KEEP THIS IN MIND:

In January 2005, WADA recommended that the 80% basic bands criterion should no longer be used

You mentioned before that they went back to it for a short period of time. When did that end. You can't fool me, ******

[IMG]http://i284.***********.com/albums/ll36/Bigsteve87/Gifs/AtomicBomb.gif[/IMG]

[ADP02]

One more...I couldn't resist.



It's not going to work! You know I have enough information about this to shut you down at any time, right?

The man who designed the test:
Dr. Francoise Lasne: NO THRESHOLD FOR EPO ANALOGUE CERA BECAUSE IT IS QUALITATIVE.




Oh, and this one is particularly important. Tells us not only about your intensity being qualitative, but also, tells us more about the BAP that you keep talking about



There are WADA experts in court stating that EPO testing is qualitative.




Is the WADA expert wrong? You love that line.

OWNED.

Now for the last time....these criteria are NOT threshold criteria. It says it here clearly!

Court of Arbitration for Sport!

I explained this to your dumb ass before. A threshold is an allowance. I can smoke a little marijuana and be below the threshold. I can smoke more and be at the threshold. I can smoke even more and exceed it. EPO doesn't work that way. They test the urine and the image reveals if rEPO is there or not. That's it. Nothing is moving. Nothing is approaching and exceeding a threshold, which is how you described it!



exceed | ikˈsēd |
verb [with object]
go beyond what is allowed

The criteria don't show something "going beyond what is allowed." It simply shows what the thing is.

[size="5"]In EVERY SINGLE CASE of a threshold criteria, the thing that is being measured can exceed or be below the threshold. Above you

It's more qualitative I agree. I said this early on, remember? You then try to use that to DEFLECT!

All you do is try to use words to try to discredit instead of trying to understand what is being said!!! You know, you are trying to use loop-holes and confuse others but that doesn't work with me, DEFLECTOR!!!

As a whole the EPO testing is qualitative since there are numerous types of tests and variables to consider but there are quantitative test results!!!

Also, look it up. There is also a such thing as qualitative thresholds!


Anyways, we are not trying to establish if there is a quantitative test.


The discussion:
Is there threshold type test(s) for EPO testing.

Stick with that and you will find some threshold type tests DEFLECTOR!!!!!




.

[travestyny]

It's more qualitative I agree. I said this early on, remember? You then try to use that to DEFLECT!

All you do is try to use words to try to discredit instead of trying to understand what is being said!!! You know, you are trying to use loop-holes and confuse others but that doesn't work with me, DEFLECTOR!!!

As a whole the EPO testing is qualitative since there are numerous types of tests and variables to consider but there are quantitative test results!!!

Also, look it up. There is also a such thing as qualitative thresholds!


The discussion:
Is there threshold type tests for EPO testing.

Stick with that and you will find some threshold type tests DEFLECTOR!!!!!

Don't tell me what to stick to when you won't answer EVEN ONE of my questions. STOP DUCKING.

1. IS THE BAP CRITERIA IN THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT?
2. When did you first change from Threshold Substance to Threshold Criteria?
3. Does the WADA TD2014EPO document mention ABP being used to test for EPO specifically?
4. Can rEPO be below the "threshold" you speak of?




WHERE ARE THE ANSWERS????????


And you just merked yourself by admitting it's qualitative....and then trying to say it's a qualitative threshold. LMAOOOOOOO. IT'S NOT A THRESHOLD YOU IDIOT. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A THRESHOLD IS.

[ADP02]

I'M WRONG ABOUT WHAT EXACTLY, ADP? I'M STILL WAITING FOR YOU TO TELL ME WHAT THE EXPERTS SAID ABOUT THE CRITERIA IN THE WADA TD2014 EPO DOCUMENT.


CAN YOU QUOTE ANY WADA EXPERT SAYING THAT THERE ARE THRESHOLD CRITERIA IN THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT?

I'M WAITING!!!!!


Why won't you answer my questions, ADP

I'll gladly answer this. THE WADA EXPERTS DON'T SAY THAT I'M WRONG BECAUSE THE ONLY THING THAT THEY HAVE EVER CALLED A THRESHOLD WAS THE BAP CRITERIA FROM 2003 THAT IS NO LONGER IN USE!!!!!


DO YOU DENY THIS, ADP?????

QUESTION: WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME THE BAP CRITERIA THAT YOU HAVE BEEN REFERRING TO USED? KEEP THIS IN MIND:



You mentioned before that they went back to it for a short period of time. When did that end. You can't fool me, ******

I told you that you would be DEFLECTING AGAIN!!!!


Discussion that we were disagreeing on:
Those statements brought up from the panel (CAS) in that case. Nothing else DEFLECTOR!!!!


Again, based on the panels statements from that case:

I say that the WADA EPO EXPERTS are right and YOU Travestyny ARE WRONG!!!



Both sides in that case called it threshold type tests!!!!




.

[travestyny]

2) The resulting data is validated against specific threshold criteria, when artificial EPO, in relation to naturally occurring EPO, exceeds threshold limits.

Again, here you are saying rEPO exceeds threshold limits.


Can rEPO be below threshold limits according to the WADA TD2014EPO document, ADP?


Waiting

[travestyny]

I told you that you would be DEFLECTING AGAIN!!!!


Discussion that we were disagreeing on:
Those statements brought up from the panel (CAS) in that case. Nothing else DEFLECTOR!!!!


Again, based on the panels statements from that case:

I say that the WADA EPO EXPERTS are right and YOU Travestyny ARE WRONG!!!



Both sides in that case called it threshold type tests!!!!




.

What are you even talking about? The decision from the panel proves you are wrong, you idiot!!!!

Court of Arbitration for Sport!

• The criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur
  
  
  
  
• The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.
  
  
  
  
• there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

NO THRESHOLD!!!!!!

Now what did you say?

2) The resulting data is validated against specific threshold criteria, when artificial EPO, in relation to naturally occurring EPO, exceeds threshold limits.

THAT IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH WHAT THE COURT POSTED. EXPLAIN!

[travestyny]

YOU KEEP ASKING IF THE WADA EXPERTS WERE WRONG. DO YOU MEAN WERE THEY WRONG ABOUT AN OLD CRITERIA THAT NO LONGER EXISTS? DOES IT EXIST IN THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT, ADP?

Deflection Count: 12. Why won't he answer??? LOOK AT THIS SHlT!!!!!!!


ADP, STOP BRINGING UP YOUR 2003 BAP CRITERIA UNLESS YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION YOU KEEP DUCKING AND DEFLECTING FROM. I'M WAITING!!!! I WONDER WHY YOU WON'T JUST ANSWER!!!!

1.

SHOW ME THAT OLD BAP CRITERIA THAT YOU KEEP BRINGING UP IN THE TD2014EPO DOCUMENT!!!!!!

2.

IS THE BAP IN THE TD2014 EPO DOCUMENT? YES OR NO, ADP? WATCH YOU IGNORE THIS!

3.

ANSWER THIS FUVCCKING QUESTION: DOES THE BAP CRITERIA EVEN EXIST IN THE TD2014 DOCUMENT?

4.

DOES THE BAP CRITERIA EXIST IN THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT OR NOT ADP??????

5.

How long are you going to duck this? Is the BAP in the WADA TD2014EPO document?????? Yes or no?

6.

IS THE BAP CRITERIA IN THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT? YES OR NO?????

7.

IS THAT CRITERIA IN THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT OR NOT? YES OR NO?

8.

THAT IS NOT AN ANSWER. DOES THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT HAVE THE CRITERIA THAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO, ADP? WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER?????

9.

is the criteria that you claim the wada experts are rightly referring to as a threshold a part of the wada td2014epo document???????? Answer the question, adp!!!

10.

Is the BAP in the TD2014EPO document. I forgot how many times I asked you this, but I'll update the list.
ANSWER PLEASE!

11.

What criteria in the WADA TD2014EPO have the WADA experts said is a threshold? Quote it specifically for us all to see.

12.

Don't tell me what to stick to when you won't answer EVEN ONE of my questions. STOP DUCKING.

1. IS THE BAP CRITERIA IN THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT?

A Deflecting PIECE OF SHlT AT IT AGAIN!!!!!

[ADP02]

I told you that you would be DEFLECTING AGAIN!!!!

Discussion that we were disagreeing on:
Those statements brought up from the panel (CAS) in that case. Nothing else DEFLECTOR!!!!


Again, based on the panels statements from that case:

I say that the WADA EPO EXPERTS are right and YOU Travestyny ARE WRONG!!!



Both sides in that case called it threshold type tests!!!! LOL




.

What are you even talking about? The decision from the panel proves you are wrong, you idiot!!!!

Court of Arbitration for Sport!

NO THRESHOLD!!!!!!

Now what did you say?

THAT IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH WHAT THE COURT POSTED. EXPLAIN!

Travestyny has been placed on CONFUSION ALERT. Someone needs to help this poor guy!


I'm a patient guy. What are you not able to understand? This is easy basic stuff!!!



You know that there can be multiple types of threshold tests, right?


We BOTH agree finally that ABP has threshold tests, right?
Are all thresholds tests based on a threshold greater than what is humanly possible? NO!!!!

For ABP, They can just be checking the swings for a given individual and if they make any sense. A given result may actually be acceptable for another athlete but not the swings or threshold tests that they test for that given individual.




Sorry but you keep on thinking what the panel was discussing is what we are disagreeing on but the problem is YOUR COMPREHENSION!!! IT IS WRONG!!!



I told you what they were discussing. This is NOT a test to see that they are testing a quantity of EPO that is above the quantity that is humanly produced.

It's clear for me, the WADA EPO EXPERTS, the 2 sides who were making their point in that case and numerous other people.


Well, everyone gets it except for Travestyny, who keeps on being CONFUSED and getting it WRONG!!!!



.

[travestyny]

Travestyny has been placed on CONFUSION ALERT. Someone needs to help this poor guy!


I'm a patient guy. What are you not able to understand? This is easy basic stuff!!!



You know that there can be multiple types of threshold tests, right?


We BOTH agree finally that ABP has threshold tests, right?
Are all thresholds tests based on a threshold greater than what is humanly possible? NO!!!!

For ABP, They can just be checking the swings for a given individual and if they make any sense. A given result may actually be acceptable for another athlete but not the swings or threshold tests that they test for that given individual.




Sorry but you keep on thinking what the panel was discussing is what we are disagreeing on but the problem is YOUR COMPREHENSION!!! IT IS WRONG!!!



I told you what they were discussing. This is NOT a test to see that they are testing a quantity of EPO that is above the quantity that is humanly produced.

It's clear for me, the WADA EPO EXPERTS, the 2 sides who were making their point in that case and numerous other people.


Well, everyone gets it except for Travestyny, who keeps on being CONFUSED and getting it WRONG!!!!



.

This is what's clear:

Court of Arbitration for Sport!

• The criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur
  
  
• The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.
  
  
• there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

IT TELLS YOU SPECIFICALLY THAT THESE CRITERIA ARE NOT THRESHOLDS, YOU IDIOT

YES, EVERYONE GETS IT. THE COURT, THE 4 JUDGES, ME, THE WADA EXPERTS (WHO NEVER SAID ANYTHING WAS A THRESHOLD EXCEPT FOR A CRITERIA THAT DATES BACK TO 2003 AND IS NO LONGER USED, BUT YOU KEEP AVOIDING THAT LIKE THE PLAGUE). THE MAN WHO DEVELOPED THE TEST EVEN SAID THAT IT'S NOT A THRESHOLD. YOU ADMIT THAT IT'S QUALITATIVE AND THEN TRY TO SAY THERE ARE QUALITATIVE THRESHOLDS. LMAOOOOOOOOO. THE COURT WAS VERY CLEAR. IT'S NOT A THRESHOLD.

TELL US, ADP. IF rEPO CAN EXCEED THE "THRESHOLD,"

2) The resulting data is validated against specific threshold criteria, when artificial EPO, in relation to naturally occurring EPO, exceeds threshold limits.

CAN rEPO BE LOWER THAN THE "THRESHOLD"????? YOU WON'T ANSWER!!!!!

I'M THE ONE WHO'S PATIENT. I ALREADY DECAPITATED YOU 4-0 ON THIS TOPIC AND YOU'RE STILL CRYING. BUT I OFFERED YOU A REMATCH.....AND YOU WON'T EVEN MENTION IT!!!!!!!!! AHAHAHAHAHAHAH. OH...THAT'S AFTER HALF-WAY THROUGH YOU SENT A PM BEGGING FOR A DRAW. DIDN'T YOU???

let me know what you think:

You want to call this a draw or whatever the right word is?

While it may be too late since we have others involved in this too, I think its never too late.

We just say that we both realized that it was just a misunderstanding ..... Never been to the Thunderdome and may not be acceptable, but I really do not care what others think.

No, bltch. There was no misunderstanding. You DEFLECTED your way into a 4-0 Decapitation!!!!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[travestyny]

I'm tired of the bullshlt with you ducking questions and claiming that everyone misunderstands this but you, ADP02.

A total of 6 people heard the information regarding this topic in a debate setting. 5 people(including me) said I am right and you are wrong. 1 person (ONLY YOU) said you are right and I am wrong.

I'm willing to settle this 1 of 2 ways:

1. I'll offer you a chance to redeem yourself from the 4-0 asswhoopin in a rematch. Do you agree?

2. I offer a quid pro quo challenge. I'll even let you go first. You ask a question....I answer. Then I ask a question...you answer.

Option 1 stops you from claiming I'm misunderstanding. The judge decides who has it wrong.

Option 2 stops you from ducking my questions. You should be ashamed of yourself that I asked you the same question 12 times and you have refused to respond.

Don't write me any more of your bullshlt over and over. Choose one option and let's end it. If you choose option 2 and keep ducking my questions, or keep claiming I'm deflecting, then we go to option 1 and let 2 judges decide. Agreed?

If you decline both, then just accept your 4-0 loss and that's it, deflector. What's your decision, deflector?

This is not a discussion on Threshold substance

Sample A is a mixture of those 2 urine samples. There the second is diluting the initial one.

b) Threshold substances, there can be traces but the delay and dilution will drive down the numbers