Sugar Ray Robinson or Chris Eubank?

[hemichromis]

heres my welter/ middle list

robinson
hagler
eubank
leonard
hearns
ii think benn would struggle even to be sixth but like hearns he always had very exciting fights

[Archie Leach]

No way Benn sucked, he went to the states and fought and beat top ranked men of the day. He beat McClellan who was highly rated. Eubank cant be compared to Robinson though I agree thats a stupid comparison.

benn was a hard hitting exciting fighter. but he also had a glass chin
and terrible stamina. if that fight was officiated properly it would have been
a ko in 1 for mclellen. watch the fight again and you will see benn is helped back into the ring and that dirty **** ref gives benn extra time to recover
after the count and literly holds mclellen back!
benn didnt injure mclellen that ref did

benn and eubank dodged lights out toney, roy jones and michael nunn.

[Archie Leach]

eubank would stand a very good chance of beating hearns hagler duran an leonard

lay of the drugs son

[Nostromo]

The general concensus among boxing's astute observers is that (#4#) Sugar Ray Robinson - to this day - remains the single greatest practicioner of the 'sweet science.' To conjure-up a hypothical opponet that would defeat him is pure poppycock!

[Archie Leach]

i agree poppycock