My own opinion. hagler was not a fighter that left an opportunity in the ring to be second guessed... He was coming hard, come hell, or high water. He never had a reason to second guess his effort.
Compare that to floyd for example. Who fought in a manner which was risk adverse, and left people doubting certain fights, like the Castillo fignt.
Floyd has to tell anyone that will listen how good he was, to me this shows insecurity, the belief that maybe a few more risks coulda/shoulda been taken... For example, risks guaranteeing a really steller round against Pac...
Marvin never had that consideration, never really had to second guess his approach, primarily because of his style... I believe this made him secure enough to not need to wax and wane when it came time to quitting.
Marvin could never say "If I came a little bit harder, and more at Ray, the fight might really be different." The only difference to hagler was what the judges would say.
Compare that to floyd for example. Who fought in a manner which was risk adverse, and left people doubting certain fights, like the Castillo fignt.
Floyd has to tell anyone that will listen how good he was, to me this shows insecurity, the belief that maybe a few more risks coulda/shoulda been taken... For example, risks guaranteeing a really steller round against Pac...
Marvin never had that consideration, never really had to second guess his approach, primarily because of his style... I believe this made him secure enough to not need to wax and wane when it came time to quitting.
Marvin could never say "If I came a little bit harder, and more at Ray, the fight might really be different." The only difference to hagler was what the judges would say.
Comment