There is always much discussion as to who ducked whom, but what about the reverse, the guy they should have ducked, but didn't?
The one I always think of is Nino Benvenuti and the decision to take on Carlos Monzon.
When Benvenuti came into the 1970 season he had already defeated 7 of the top 10 Ring Magazine ranked middleweights (1969). He was pretty much in a position to choose anyone without there being any accusation of 'ducking' being thrown his way.
Benvenuti's team decision was to take on the weakest ranked fighter on the list, #10 ranked Carlos Monzon.
****, what a surprise! -- If Benvenuti had done the 'right thing' and given Griffith another shot, or Rodriguez a rematch, I suspect no one would have noticed he ducked Monzon.
Anyone else know of a 'he should've ducked him' decision?
The one I always think of is Nino Benvenuti and the decision to take on Carlos Monzon.
When Benvenuti came into the 1970 season he had already defeated 7 of the top 10 Ring Magazine ranked middleweights (1969). He was pretty much in a position to choose anyone without there being any accusation of 'ducking' being thrown his way.
Benvenuti's team decision was to take on the weakest ranked fighter on the list, #10 ranked Carlos Monzon.
****, what a surprise! -- If Benvenuti had done the 'right thing' and given Griffith another shot, or Rodriguez a rematch, I suspect no one would have noticed he ducked Monzon.
Anyone else know of a 'he should've ducked him' decision?
Comment