Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Joe Louis 1967-How I beat Clay

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
    Our favorite halfwit posted as proof a link that does not work. A convincing job.
    .........

    Comment


    • #12
      At first I was tempted to give Joe the advantage if the ring size were diminished to 14 feet squared or smaller. Upon further reflection I realized Louis will always get hit multiple times first, regardless of ring size. Now I am no longer confident that Louis could beat Casssius in any sized ring whatso--by buggery--ever.

      Comment


      • #13
        - -Nat Fleischer was still alive in 1967 and gave Joe this platform to speak.

        Personally, The Dempsey/Louis bout was a better one with two warriors minus the stink of Clay. It was almost there had Dempsey made his comeback in the middle of his exhibition tour.

        Yeah, a very old Jack vs a very young Louis may not be relevant, but it would been Dempsey vs Louis for the ages nonetheless!

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
          Our favorite halfwit posted as proof a link that does not work. A convincing job.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
            - -Nat Fleischer was still alive in 1967 and gave Joe this platform to speak.

            Personally, The Dempsey/Louis bout was a better one with two warriors minus the stink of Clay. It was almost there had Dempsey made his comeback in the middle of his exhibition tour.

            Yeah, a very old Jack vs a very young Louis may not be relevant, but it would been Dempsey vs Louis for the ages nonetheless!
            - -Yupsir, a read it and weep moment of reckoning for marshmallow moderns!

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
              - -Yupsir, a read it and weep moment of reckoning for marshmallow moderns!
              Queenie, find us a link that works. Would love to read it.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
                Queenie, find us a link that works. Would love to read it.
                - -Talk to U overseers.

                The physical link to the link obvious to all but moles, blind cave salamanders, and uncountable amoeba.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
                  - -Talk to U overseers.

                  The physical link to the link obvious to all but moles, blind cave salamanders, and uncountable amoeba.
                  U ridiculous!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
                    U ridiculous!
                    - -Small wonder U can't understand a boxers timeline of development.

                    No matter, well established Joe laid the blueprint for Frazier, and make no mistake, neither had blazing footwork. Theirs much more educated and superior .

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
                      - -Small wonder U can't understand a boxers timeline of development.

                      No matter, well established Joe laid the blueprint for Frazier, and make no mistake, neither had blazing footwork. Theirs much more educated and superior .
                      We are not talking about your pecker here!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP