At first I was tempted to give Joe the advantage if the ring size were diminished to 14 feet squared or smaller. Upon further reflection I realized Louis will always get hit multiple times first, regardless of ring size. Now I am no longer confident that Louis could beat Casssius in any sized ring whatso--by buggery--ever.
- -Nat Fleischer was still alive in 1967 and gave Joe this platform to speak.
Personally, The Dempsey/Louis bout was a better one with two warriors minus the stink of Clay. It was almost there had Dempsey made his comeback in the middle of his exhibition tour.
Yeah, a very old Jack vs a very young Louis may not be relevant, but it would been Dempsey vs Louis for the ages nonetheless!
- -Nat Fleischer was still alive in 1967 and gave Joe this platform to speak.
Personally, The Dempsey/Louis bout was a better one with two warriors minus the stink of Clay. It was almost there had Dempsey made his comeback in the middle of his exhibition tour.
Yeah, a very old Jack vs a very young Louis may not be relevant, but it would been Dempsey vs Louis for the ages nonetheless!
- -Yupsir, a read it and weep moment of reckoning for marshmallow moderns!
- -Small wonder U can't understand a boxers timeline of development.
No matter, well established Joe laid the blueprint for Frazier, and make no mistake, neither had blazing footwork. Theirs much more educated and superior .
- -Small wonder U can't understand a boxers timeline of development.
No matter, well established Joe laid the blueprint for Frazier, and make no mistake, neither had blazing footwork. Theirs much more educated and superior .
Comment