If I remember correctly Foreman was given a contract to fight Tyson, but refused to deal with King.
Either way, doesn't matter. Anyone that thinks 90s Foreman had a chance to beat any version of Tyspn pre-2000 is on crack.
While Foremans accomplishments for a 40+ year old man were great, the revisionist history regarding his actual ability as a fighter at that point is in full force nowadays. The man went life and death with crackheads like Stewart and Schulz, split up the belts because he wouldn't fight a live body (if a 96 version of Tucker and Schulz rematch constitute as that anyway), and lost decisively to Holyfield and Morrison.
Tyson was waaaaay too good for him for styles to come into play here.
Either way, doesn't matter. Anyone that thinks 90s Foreman had a chance to beat any version of Tyspn pre-2000 is on crack.
While Foremans accomplishments for a 40+ year old man were great, the revisionist history regarding his actual ability as a fighter at that point is in full force nowadays. The man went life and death with crackheads like Stewart and Schulz, split up the belts because he wouldn't fight a live body (if a 96 version of Tucker and Schulz rematch constitute as that anyway), and lost decisively to Holyfield and Morrison.
Tyson was waaaaay too good for him for styles to come into play here.
Comment