Vitali

[ShoulderRoll]

Greatness should be measured on more than just resume.

Besides resume you also look at a fighter's skill set. Did he have all the tools, could he do it all in the ring?

Or was he lacking in some areas when compared to past greats?

[LacedUp]

And what did Ali actually do? Knock out limited slugger Foreman? In my book, no huge accomplishment. Klitschko's would kill both Foreman and Ali. Ali lost as well, to lesser opponents.

Vitali belongs among the greats.

The fact that you have to answer that question justifies why no one takes you seriously.

Liston twice, Norton twice, Frazier twice, Patterson twice, Foreman, Shavers, Williams, Foley etc etc.

He clearly has the best resume of any heavyweight in history, and his 8th best win is better than anything Vitali has on his resume. He had a captivating style, personality and career as a whole.

regained the championship three times, had the most complete fight of all times (arguably), came out the best in what was thought as the best era in heavyweight history, was involved in the biggest heavyweight fight ever and has more rewatchable than anyone else.

[BKM-2010]

Evidence, please.

This video shows that the things Vitali was saying in the post fight interview were absolutely preposterous:

[Weltschmerz]

Besides resume you also look at a fighter's skill set. Did he have all the tools, could he do it all in the ring?

Or was he lacking in some areas when compared to past greats?

Vitali is tremendously skilled. You clearly didn't follow his career

[joseph5620]

And what did Ali actually do? Knock out limited slugger Foreman? In my book, no huge accomplishment. Klitschko's would kill both Foreman and Ali. Ali lost as well, to lesser opponents.

Vitali belongs among the greats.

Okay, conversation over. I'm embarrassed to have taken you seriously enough to give you a response. Have fun.

[Weltschmerz]

Besides resume you also look at a fighter's skill set. Did he have all the tools, could he do it all in the ring?

Or was he lacking in some areas when compared to past greats?

Vitali is a tremendously skilled fighter. He won the kickboxing world championship before even becoming a professional boxer. He has every attribute to beat any fighter in history.

[Weltschmerz]

The fact that you have to answer that question justifies why no one takes you seriously.

Liston twice, Norton twice, Frazier twice, Patterson twice, Foreman, Shavers, Williams, Foley etc etc.

He clearly has the best resume of any heavyweight in history, and his 8th best win is better than anything Vitali has on his resume. He had a captivating style, personality and career as a whole.

regained the championship three times, had the most complete fight of all times (arguably), came out the best in what was thought as the best era in heavyweight history, was involved in the biggest heavyweight fight ever and has more rewatchable than anyone else.

His resume is based on bums by today's standards. Vitali has had more world impact than Ali, with his involvement in politics, charity, education, etc. Ali was an outrageous, unpopular man too. Vitali is seen as a man of enlightenment. Plus, Vitali made a greater comeback than Ali, by far. He outshines him in every department.

[Weltschmerz]

This video shows that the things Vitali was saying in the post fight interview were absolutely preposterous:

Your video shows fuck all, other than Lennox got that gift decision.

[ShoulderRoll]

Vitali is tremendously skilled. You clearly didn't follow his career

Notice that all I did was ask a question to help you frame your argument. I didn't even weigh in with answers of my own.

Why u mad?

[LacedUp]

His resume is based on bums by today's standards. Vitali has had more world impact than Ali, with his involvement in politics, charity, education, etc. Ali was an outrageous, unpopular man too. Vitali is seen as a man of enlightenment. Plus, Vitali made a greater comeback than Ali, by far. He outshines him in every department.

You are literally too ****** to insult.