Originally posted by New England
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Todays athletes aren't always better
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostNow think about it in practical terms rather than in the confines of an artificial construct: If someone snatched your wallet and you're chasing him that half second advantage isn't going to get him any real separation from you. In football a half a yard is "huge", the difference between an ordinary running back an elite running back. Out in the real world that half a yard is nothing. People can divvy up any artificial construct and claim those differences are huge. In practical terms, though, that really amounts to splitting hairs.
In a race/dash where everyone has trained for, that .5 second is huge
Comment
-
1. Jesse Owens wouldn't qualify for the 100m today
2. If he were allowed to run, he'd most likely finish in last
3. He might lose every race to Bolt and Gay unless they tripped or something.
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostNow think about it in practical terms rather than in the confines of an artificial construct: If someone snatched your wallet and you're chasing him that half second advantage isn't going to get him any real separation from you. In football a half a yard is "huge", the difference between an ordinary running back an elite running back. Out in the real world that half a yard is nothing. People can divvy up any artificial construct and claim those differences are huge. In practical terms, though, that really amounts to splitting hairs.
these guys are sprinting 100 meters. they're sprinters. those are the confines of any meaningful discussion of the subject,Last edited by New England; 11-19-2013, 08:51 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Postrunning down the street after a mugger is completely different,, you and the mugger arent training hard every day for races,,,
In a race/dash where everyone has trained for, that .5 second is huge
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cardinal Buck View Post1. Jesse Owens wouldn't qualify for the 100m today
2. If he were allowed to run, he'd most likely finish in last
3. He might lose every race to Bolt and Gay unless they tripped or something.
unless they pulled up with hammies, their worst races would be faster than owens' best.Last edited by New England; 11-19-2013, 08:50 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostAgain, that's an artificial construct not a practical one. Point being, from any sort of practical standpoint the differences between world class sprinters is minute. The difference between those world class sprinters and an ordinary person is huge. The differences between those world class sprinters is only huge if you arbitrarily declare that the difference between first and last MUST be huge (regardless of the actual duration of time) therefore it IS huge, when in reality it's of less duration of time than snapping your fingers. That sort of arbitrary designation easily becomes designating any difference at all between times as "huge" when, in fact, they are not in a practical sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostAgain, that's an artificial construct not a practical one. Point being, from any sort of practical standpoint the differences between world class sprinters is minute. The difference between those world class sprinters and an ordinary person is huge. The differences between those world class sprinters is only huge if you arbitrarily declare that the difference between first and last MUST be huge (regardless of the actual duration of time) therefore it IS huge, when in reality it's of less duration of time than snapping your fingers. That sort of arbitrary designation easily becomes designating any difference at all between times as "huge" when, in fact, they are not in a practical sense.
People that dont realize that is equal to someone not knowing the difference between a straight punch and a wide punch,, to the common casual viewer, there all just punches but to trainers and boxers, that narrow time and distance a straight punch shaves off compared to a wide punch, is a huge difference
Comment
-
Well to be fair: It becomes difficult in racing because the comparison depends on isolated things that cannot be compared easily outside the split second differences in a sprint, or any race.
We can consider that split second difference, fair enough, but what of the difference in materials, footwear, ground conditions, etc? Heres the proof of this assertion and why Poet might have partial ground to stand on:
Look at the difference between the sprint times and the difference in the mile. I believe that the mile has been upped quite a bit more than the split second times in the sprints...Can we assume that this is not partially due to better gear? Is the difference in the mile proportionate to the difference of the Jesse Owen's comparison? More progress has been made on the mile I would think.
The problem is how do we separate the performance from progress in materials......More progress on the mile than a sprint (proportionately) would suggest to me that materials worn play a bigger factor in the progress than simply athletic performance. Suddenly a small difference that would be relevant in the context of a race does not seem so great outside the context of the race IF other factors are causing greater leaps in progress.
We would have to have the runners run in similar conditions with similar gear to make this small difference definitely the "progress" of the athlete. Otherwise this "difference" if it is due to the same difference that has caused greater progress in all race events may be suprisingly small....i.e. maybe considering Jesse Owens ran in such inefficient conditions the race time difference is suprisingly minor and owens would in fact do much better in modern circumstances.
We will never know for sure but I suspect that running materials has at least something to do with the different times and if so....indeed a small difference may be just that. But when we compare a difference of a split second depending on how it is caused and what we compare it to, the difference is either huge, or very insignificant.Last edited by billeau2; 11-19-2013, 08:30 PM.
Comment
Comment