Robberies?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Welsh Jon
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2011
    • 922
    • 72
    • 43
    • 7,717

    #1

    Robberies?

    In which of these fights would you consider that the rightful winner was outright robbed of victory?

    Ad Wolgast KO 13 Mexican Joe Rivers (July 4 1912)

    Lou Ambers UD15 Henry Armstrong II (Aug 22, 1939)

    Joe Louis SD15 Jersey Joe Walcoltt I (December 5, 1947)

    Muhammad Ali SD 12 Ken Norton II (September 10, 1973)

    Michael Spinks UD 15 Larry Holmes I (September 21, 1985)

    Sugar Ray Leonard SD12 Marvin Hagler (April 6, 1987)

    Jose Luis Ramirez SD12 Pernell Whitaker (March 12, 1988)

    Sugar Ray Leonard D12 Thomas Hearns II (June 12, 1989)

    Julio Cesar Chavez KO 12 Meldrick Taylor I (March 17, 1990)

    Julio Cesar Chavez D12 Pernell Whitaker (Sept. 10, 1993)

    Evander Holyfield D12 Lennox Lewis I (March 13, 1999)

    Shane Mosley UD12 Oscar De La Hoya II (Sept. 13, 2003)

    Oscar De La Hoya UD12 Felix Sturm (June 5, 2004)

    Joe Calzaghe SD12 Bernard Hopkins (April 19th 2008)

    Manny Pacquiao MD12 Juan Manuel Marguez III (November 12, 2011)

    Discuss
  • Flo_Raiden
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 826
    • 72
    • 7
    • 32,503

    #2
    Whitaker against Ramirez and Chavez no doubt. Also Marquez and Hagler were outright robbed by the judges. Their fights should have been at least a draw or a win in their favor. Hearns was also jobbed as well.

    Comment

    • Sugarj
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 3784
      • 187
      • 0
      • 20,883

      #3
      Originally posted by Welsh Jon
      In which of these fights would you consider that the rightful winner was outright robbed of victory?

      Ad Wolgast KO 13 Mexican Joe Rivers (July 4 1912)

      Lou Ambers UD15 Henry Armstrong II (Aug 22, 1939)

      Joe Louis SD15 Jersey Joe Walcoltt I (December 5, 1947)

      Muhammad Ali SD 12 Ken Norton II (September 10, 1973)

      Michael Spinks UD 15 Larry Holmes I (September 21, 1985)

      Sugar Ray Leonard SD12 Marvin Hagler (April 6, 1987)

      Jose Luis Ramirez SD12 Pernell Whitaker (March 12, 1988)

      Sugar Ray Leonard D12 Thomas Hearns II (June 12, 1989)

      Julio Cesar Chavez KO 12 Meldrick Taylor I (March 17, 1990)

      Julio Cesar Chavez D12 Pernell Whitaker (Sept. 10, 1993)

      Evander Holyfield D12 Lennox Lewis I (March 13, 1999)

      Shane Mosley UD12 Oscar De La Hoya II (Sept. 13, 2003)

      Oscar De La Hoya UD12 Felix Sturm (June 5, 2004)

      Joe Calzaghe SD12 Bernard Hopkins (April 19th 2008)

      Manny Pacquiao MD12 Juan Manuel Marguez III (November 12, 2011)

      Discuss

      Walcott probably deserved the decision over Louis first time round.

      Spinks probably shaded Holmes first time round, but Holmes arguably should have been awarded the rematch.

      I did shade the second Ali Norton match to Ali by virtue of the last round. Their third fight was more contentious.

      Whitaker should have got the nod over Chavez.

      A draw was fair in the Leonard vs Hearns rematch. Though I personally scored it by a round to Hearns.

      Lewis was blatantly robbed in the first match with Holyfield.

      Oscar should have got the decision in the rematch with Mosley.

      Sturm should have been awarded the decision against Oscar.

      Watching live I felt that Hopkins deserved the verdict against Calzaghe. But on rewatching I scored it for Joe.

      Similar with Marquez. Watching live I felt that he clearly outpointed Pac. But on rewatching and scoring, he probably only shaded it by a round or two.

      The other fights aren't fresh enough in memory.

      As for the Chavez vs Taylor stoppage..................err tough call. No one really deserved to lose that fight, it was a classic.

      Comment

      • slickhook
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Dec 2004
        • 286
        • 24
        • 18
        • 6,625

        #4
        Glenn Jacobs vs Mark Calloway I



        Fixed

        Comment

        • SBleeder
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 2976
          • 190
          • 69
          • 11,231

          #5
          Originally posted by Welsh Jon
          In which of these fights would you consider that the rightful winner was outright robbed of victory?

          Ad Wolgast KO 13 Mexican Joe Rivers (July 4 1912)

          Lou Ambers UD15 Henry Armstrong II (Aug 22, 1939)

          Joe Louis SD15 Jersey Joe Walcoltt I (December 5, 1947)

          Muhammad Ali SD 12 Ken Norton II (September 10, 1973)

          Michael Spinks UD 15 Larry Holmes I (September 21, 1985)

          Sugar Ray Leonard SD12 Marvin Hagler (April 6, 1987)

          Jose Luis Ramirez SD12 Pernell Whitaker (March 12, 1988)

          Sugar Ray Leonard D12 Thomas Hearns II (June 12, 1989)

          Julio Cesar Chavez KO 12 Meldrick Taylor I (March 17, 1990)

          Julio Cesar Chavez D12 Pernell Whitaker (Sept. 10, 1993)

          Evander Holyfield D12 Lennox Lewis I (March 13, 1999)

          Shane Mosley UD12 Oscar De La Hoya II (Sept. 13, 2003)

          Oscar De La Hoya UD12 Felix Sturm (June 5, 2004)

          Joe Calzaghe SD12 Bernard Hopkins (April 19th 2008)

          Manny Pacquiao MD12 Juan Manuel Marguez III (November 12, 2011)

          Discuss
          I bolded the fights which I consider robberies. The rest of them, I either felt were close enough to defer to the judges, or I actually agreed with the decision.

          Chavez/Taylor was a completely appropriate stoppage.

          Comment

          • lightsout_finit
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2011
            • 1041
            • 406
            • 1,028
            • 1,592

            #6
            I notice a lot of people using the expression "close fight"

            It doesn't matter how close a fight was if the outcome was predetermined.
            That's what a robbery is........


            For example manny/marquez 3 was NEVER going to be given to marquez unless he kod him. They only called it a MD to make things look less bias.......

            Comment

            • Scott9945
              Gonna be more su****ious
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2007
              • 22032
              • 741
              • 1,371
              • 30,075

              #7
              Originally posted by Welsh Jon
              In which of these fights would you consider that the rightful winner was outright robbed of victory?

              Ad Wolgast KO 13 Mexican Joe Rivers (July 4 1912)

              Lou Ambers UD15 Henry Armstrong II (Aug 22, 1939)

              Joe Louis SD15 Jersey Joe Walcoltt I (December 5, 1947)

              Muhammad Ali SD 12 Ken Norton II (September 10, 1973)

              Michael Spinks UD 15 Larry Holmes I (September 21, 1985)

              Sugar Ray Leonard SD12 Marvin Hagler (April 6, 1987)

              Jose Luis Ramirez SD12 Pernell Whitaker (March 12, 1988)

              Sugar Ray Leonard D12 Thomas Hearns II (June 12, 1989)

              Julio Cesar Chavez KO 12 Meldrick Taylor I (March 17, 1990)

              Julio Cesar Chavez D12 Pernell Whitaker (Sept. 10, 1993)

              Evander Holyfield D12 Lennox Lewis I (March 13, 1999)

              Shane Mosley UD12 Oscar De La Hoya II (Sept. 13, 2003)

              Oscar De La Hoya UD12 Felix Sturm (June 5, 2004)

              Joe Calzaghe SD12 Bernard Hopkins (April 19th 2008)

              Manny Pacquiao MD12 Juan Manuel Marguez III (November 12, 2011)

              Discuss

              My selections in bold. I've never seen the first two fights listed.

              Comment

              • Barn
                TheTartanSoldier
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 8647
                • 675
                • 624
                • 42,074

                #8
                Originally posted by Scott9945
                My selections in bold. I've never seen the first two fights listed.
                This although I felt Pacquiao vs Marquez III was a blatant robbery.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 48371
                  • 4,778
                  • 266
                  • 104,043

                  #9
                  Harold Johnson-Willie Pastrano is more of a robbery than most of those examples.

                  Comment

                  • Sugarj
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 3784
                    • 187
                    • 0
                    • 20,883

                    #10
                    I forgot to comment on Leonard vs Hagler in my earlier post.

                    I've always scored that one to Leonard, I've never seen the controversy at all. Not a hope that Hagler won 6 of the rounds in that fight to my eyes.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP