Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

20 billion:Do you agree with D'Amato that a swarming fighter could never beat Foreman

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
    Tyson's problem versus George is that Tyson has to get close and likes to fight at mid-range anyway, which will put him always in George's range. Tyson is a poor inside fighter, so it will do him no good to crowd George.

    Smith and a few other fighters made what is tantamount to a tacit agreement with Tyson by tying him up on the ropes. Tyson's part of the agreement was to let them do this again and again and not try hard to prevent it or escape it.
    All I can say to this nonsense is Ho Ho Ho, Santa is on his way.
    moneytheman Ascended likes this.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by edgarg View Post

      George generally missed at least 3/4 of his punches, even against ordinary opponents. and pushed them rather more than was good.
      Ohh yeaa I seen you before from old post I read on thats a fact I said that before to earlier I explained how a bowe and fury would destroy the people george fought way easier

      George only did good when his person was where he needed them if they wasnt he stuggled cause his aim was bad and his tech was trash

      Example vs luis and especially the Joe match he was just standing there close to the ropes 1st round where joe just is ducking at will and george just swinging wild missing

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by edgarg View Post

        All I can say to this nonsense is Ho Ho Ho, Santa is on his way.
        I explained to that crazy idiot saying those ****** quotes that been exposed as bull years ago we got video those quotes are meaningless

        Comment


        • #84
          Edgarg and moneytheman have the same ip. The latter handle tries to differentiate by coming across as slightly more imbecilic. But the shared qualities are not adequately masked. Neither knows anything about boxing.
          The Old LefHook The Old LefHook likes this.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post
            Edgarg and moneytheman have the same ip. The latter handle tries to differentiate by coming across as slightly more imbecilic. But the shared qualities are not adequately masked. Neither knows anything about boxing.
            Yup I know nothing about boxing cause I tell the truth another dumb quote get glasses and how cant I know boxing when I explained and always have explained stuff on video


            a person who doesn't know wouldnt be able to say anything would they see how your dumb quotes you used other idiot followers use make no sense

            you crazy idiot think before you speak they should have thought you that in school

            and no im not ed he doesn't insult you crazy idiots like me he does it in a civil way
            Last edited by Ascended; 07-08-2022, 07:56 PM.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post
              Edgarg and moneytheman have the same ip. The latter handle tries to differentiate by coming across as slightly more imbecilic. But the shared qualities are not adequately masked. Neither knows anything about boxing.
              Edgar is an old timer here and knows what he’s talking about. Money the man is a troll and won’t stay long.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post

                Edgar is an old timer here and knows what he’s talking about. Money the man is a troll and won’t stay long.


                I'd have bet on Tyson at that time. No question. Tyson was a bobbing and weaving defensive expert who rarely got hit until his later years and a ton of ******* did him in. AND they way his feet were always placed he was ALWAYS ready to launch a sudden attack. NO Tyson would have cleaned up on slow, clumsy, non technical Foreman 10 times out of 10, in my opinion.

                I don't see why so-called self-styled experts here, cannot see the absolute skill in Tyson's bobbing/weaving defence, which was always ready for attack. Even watching a few of his fights early or later, should show this clearly. He was ALWAYS ready to seize the split-second opening to hit.[/QUOTE

                what are you talking about troll when i have said this same stuff but just in a different way so wouldnt that mean I know what im talking about also so you make no sense like you shouldn't have said that cause it made no sense your crazy just like the rest
                Last edited by Ascended; 07-09-2022, 03:43 PM.

                Comment


                • #88
                  So is Dempsey considered a swarming fighter?

                  Against Willard he worked an in-out style until he scored with the left, about 1:30 into the fight.

                  Wonder how that would play against Big George.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Moneymǝn is an embarrassment, but so was Rodney Dangerfield, who was not as funny.


                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
                      So is Dempsey considered a swarming fighter?

                      Against Willard he worked an in-out style until he scored with the left, about 1:30 into the fight.

                      Wonder how that would play against Big George.
                      Facts but jack was a lhw he gives george trouble for awile but he can't hurt george much but the keyword is lhw had he been a real hw I pick him to win

                      Willard was trash

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP