Originally posted by CarlosG815
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What hits harder, a gloved fist or a bare one?
Collapse
-
-
Interesting question.
I think we can all agree that bare knuckles cause more facial damage due to the impact of bone on bone, but also more likely to break your hand for that same reason. As for whether a fighter will consciously or subconsciously pull his punches to avoid hand damage I think that depends on the situation. In a street fight where you're probably going to be taken unawares and even fighting for your life, not to mention the effect of alcohol on your mental state, then I don't think it's a factor. In a bare knuckle boxing fight on the other hand you're going to be fighting a trained opponent over a long period of time, so you're going to be more protective of your hands. That might cause you to pull your punches or aim predominantly to the midsection, as the old timers were said to have done.
A gloved fist allows you to repeatedly throw with more power, but there comes a point when extra padding becomes just that, extra padding. An 8oz glove causes significantly more damage than a 16oz, yet protects your hand from all but the worst of breaks. Whether the added weight has an effect on the impact of the punch I don't know. Maybe slightly, but it would also affect the speed of your punches over the long haul. I'd say the benefit is definitely in protection of your hands over a sustained period of time.
There are a number of factors involved though. Is the opponent more likely to go down from pain or because he gets his lights put out? Is the opponent trained to defend against ungloved opponents or ungloved attackers? Is the opponent prone to cuts and facial swelling? Are the puncher's knuckles flat or sharp? etc... etc...
Whilst the difference in raw impact might well be negligible, the effects of both types of punches are very different.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jabsRstiff View PostA punch with a boxing glove will have more concussive force, while the bare-fisted one will bring about more pain and structural damage to the recipient.
I'm a chemist. I have to follow rules for that title to stick. The rules are called scientific method. Any scientist follows them other wise they have no hope of peer review. With out peer judgment of your findings theres no reason to find at all. Fight Science doesn't follow scientific method. They aren't looking to publish in a scientific journal nor do they enjoy any peer review. You might as well tell me you've caught an episode on myth buster and now you believe yourself to have a handle on Dirac's equation.....it describes Fermions, and Antimatter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by It's Ovah View PostInteresting question.
I think we can all agree that bare knuckles cause more facial damage due to the impact of bone on bone, but also more likely to break your hand for that same reason. As for whether a fighter will consciously or subconsciously pull his punches to avoid hand damage I think that depends on the situation. In a street fight where you're probably going to be taken unawares and even fighting for your life, not to mention the effect of alcohol on your mental state, then I don't think it's a factor. In a bare knuckle boxing fight on the other hand you're going to be fighting a trained opponent over a long period of time, so you're going to be more protective of your hands. That might cause you to pull your punches or aim predominantly to the midsection, as the old timers were said to have done.
A gloved fist allows you to repeatedly throw with more power, but there comes a point when extra padding becomes just that, extra padding. An 8oz glove causes significantly more damage than a 16oz, yet protects your hand from all but the worst of breaks. Whether the added weight has an effect on the impact of the punch I don't know. Maybe slightly, but it would also affect the speed of your punches over the long haul. I'd say the benefit is definitely in protection of your hands over a sustained period of time.
There are a number of factors involved though. Is the opponent more likely to go down from pain or because he gets his lights put out? Is the opponent trained to defend against ungloved opponents or ungloved attackers? Is the opponent prone to cuts and facial swelling? Are the puncher's knuckles flat or sharp? etc... etc...
Whilst the difference in raw impact might well be negligible, the effects of both types of punches are very different.
Comment
-
Originally posted by McGoorty View PostI understand you, and you have brought up some interesting points. But one thing was different,... the knuckles of an old bare knuckle pro were great weapons,... bome on hard surface contact over time builds up callouses, and the fist flattens out. I've seen the knuckles of an old Korean artist who was very used to using his fists in no-holds barred style of fighting, as well as punching a brick over a thousand times a day,... the man, although in his late 50's still had the most awesome looking fists I've ever seen...... that method goes way back into long lost centuries........... I dare say that his fists would have very closely resembled those of a Jem Mace or Bendigo. Hitting anything hard causes minute fractures and the bones get harder as a result, a bit similar to the minute tears in muscles when weightlifting, that's how muscles grow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by McGoorty View PostI understand you, and you have brought up some interesting points. But one thing was different,... the knuckles of an old bare knuckle pro were great weapons,... bome on hard surface contact over time builds up callouses, and the fist flattens out. I've seen the knuckles of an old Korean artist who was very used to using his fists in no-holds barred style of fighting, as well as punching a brick over a thousand times a day,... the man, although in his late 50's still had the most awesome looking fists I've ever seen...... that method goes way back into long lost centuries........... I dare say that his fists would have very closely resembled those of a Jem Mace or Bendigo. Hitting anything hard causes minute fractures and the bones get harder as a result, a bit similar to the minute tears in muscles when weightlifting, that's how muscles grow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxkickboxmma View PostSort of like the bare knuckle streetfighter Kimbo Slice?
Comment
-
Originally posted by It's Ovah View PostI hadn't considered that. It's true that a lot of hardcore martial artists have extremely conditioned fists which would lessen the effect of breaks (though probably hugely increase the risk of arthritis in later life). Even boxers' knuckles tend to flatten out over time. Getting clocked with a solid lump of partially fused bone doesn't sound like much fun when put in that manner. I still contend that gloved fists allow a fighter to repeatedly deliver hard concussive shots, but you've given me food for thought.
Comment
-
Quick question, ive heard it both ways since i broke my hand and fractured a finger the last couple of scraps i got in, Does a break or fracture make u MORE likely to Re - Injure the hand or LESS so?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Surgeon View PostQuick question, ive heard it both ways since i broke my hand and fractured a finger the last couple of scraps i got in, Does a break or fracture make u MORE likely to Re - Injure the hand or LESS so?
Comment
Comment