Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greatest Mexican Fighters

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by New England View Post
    did you see them fight?
    Yes.

    IMO, Barrera has the better jab, the better defense, and is the better overall boxer.

    Comment


    • #52
      Plus, people always say the Marquez has the best combinations but Barrera is/was no slouch either in that department.



      Especially the 5th round.

      Comment


      • #53
        Plus, people always say the Marquez has the best combinations but Barrera is/was no slouch either in that department.


        Marquez's are more refined/******lined...Barrera's more explosive, especially the way he'd automatically deliver that left hook to the body at the end.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Rich Loc Jr View Post
          Plus, people always say the Marquez has the best combinations but Barrera is/was no slouch either in that department.



          Especially the 5th round.
          I loved the combo he used to finish off Ayala with
          http://********/AcurvSkp38E?t=6m24s

          5 out of 5 punches landed, and to top it all off it was started by a perfect right hand counter shot after Ayala missed a left hand. and to finish the job, a left hook to the body against a fighter that had never been down before.
          nasty.

          Comment


          • #55
            Barrera had some EXCELLENT combinations man but in my mind Marquez is a league above in that department, his combinations truely are a thing of beauty they flow like water! Infact id name him as THE premier combination puncher of the era, perhaps ever. Oh Yeah....

            Comment


            • #56
              I think of Marquez as a fighter with slightly better technique but Barrera is/was a tougher fighter and harder puncher.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by RINGG View Post
                I think of Marquez as a fighter with slightly better technique but Barrera is/was a tougher fighter and harder puncher.

                After seeing JMM go 12 rounds after a 3 knockdown first round along with a badly broken nose, I'm not willing to concede a toughness advantage to anyone.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
                  After seeing JMM go 12 rounds after a 3 knockdown first round along with a badly broken nose, I'm not willing to concede a toughness advantage to anyone.
                  What did marquez in was chin. He is the overall better fighter than morales and barrera and pac as well. If he had a good chin he would of won against pac.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Where does the History section rank Kid Aztec?

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by theplayerpimp View Post
                      What did marquez in was chin. He is the overall better fighter than morales and barrera and pac as well. If he had a good chin he would of won against pac.
                      it's a combination of his Chin and legs

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP