Herol Graham was a very underrated fighter who would have undoubtedly beaten Eubank, imo. Benn as well, but Benn was all heart and power, and with Graham's weak chin that would be pretty threatening, although I would still favor Graham.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Post 1950 has there been a harder, stronger, durable fighter Than Chris Eubank?
Collapse
-
Herol Graham is often attacked for his weak chin. It's certainly a valid criticism (although I think the punch that Jackson caught him with would have sunk plenty of good chins also). But "Bomber" also had a bit of a problem with his fitness. It wasn't unusual to see him run out of gas in the championship rounds.
A great technician, tho. He was a genuine throwback in terms of boxing skills. You could tell that Hamed learned a lot from him. But Hamed was a reactive fighter who used his natural athleticism and reactions to avoid punches. Bomber anticipated them and took evasive action.
This proactive style of defence gave Bomber a few tenths of a second advantage over Hamed. Which is why he remained difficult to hit even in the latter stages of his career whilst Hamed started to get caught when his reactions slipped over his extravagant lifestyle.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugarj View PostFunnily enough, Steve Collins himself was very tough, durable and had an excellent chin too.
A vote should surely go to Marvin Hagler as an embodiment of all those superlatives.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by lightsout_finit View PostEubank was always weak to body punches..........
Comment
-
Comment