Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Julio Cesar Chavez Lucky Through Out His Career?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
These posts make NO sense. If one crouches, do his thighs not become lower to the ground?
I thought it was obvious what I meant.
When Pernell crouches his head is where his thighs would normally be. Chavez anticipates him crouching and when he doesn't he ends up hitting him in the thighs
Comment
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby View PostI thought it was obvious what I meant.
When Pernell crouches his head is where his thighs would normally be. Chavez anticipates him crouching and when he doesn't he ends up hitting him in the thighs
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby View PostMy point is shots to the thighs are unavoidable though when a fighter like to crouch and as I said shots to the crotch are far more debilitating.
That said Pernell had Chavez just about completely debilitated by hitting him to the nuts and Chavez was coming up in weight to make the fight AND STILL all Pernell could pull off was a draw? Looks like your the one making excuses.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby View PostLOL says the guy who thinks Roger Mayweather was a top 10 welterweight in the late 80s even though he didn't have single fight at the weight.
Comment
-
SCtrojan always distorts the truth to justify his views. Chavez was an ATG, top 25 at least. That said Lockridge has no case he was beaten in a close contest, but Sweet Pea kicked his azz, not even close! You could say Chavez was lucky in the Taylor fight, but looking at his legs, face and eyes while the ref counted to him,maybe Taylor was the lucky one. The second Randall fight looked like it was turning Randalls way but sheet happens.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostLets get it straight son, I PROVED it! If you have a problem with The Rings ratings you should take it up with them. You keep avoiding my question.....do you think you know more and are better suited for the job than The Rings rating committee?
lol you proved nothing except that you are a lunatic who thinks anybody what rank a fighter top 10 that had never fought at the weight
Comment
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby View Postlol you proved nothing except that you are a lunatic who thinks anybody what rank a fighter top 10 that had never fought at the weight
Is it any different than Manny recently getting ranked and than a shot at a vacant 154 title? The ONLY difference is I would have been complaining had Roger been given an unjustified title shot without fighting at that weight, just as I did with Pac. Thoughts?
And it still doesn't change the FACT that he was ranked, does it?
Comment
Comment