Originally posted by sonnyboyx2
View Post
I said Ruiz was #1 contender not on merit but because of ABC politics, which is true. Beating Williams, Feliz, Cawley and Ballard did not make him worthy of being #1 contender.
i said Lewis should have fought Ruiz because Ruiz was the No1 contender... but to give your agenda some leverage you twist it around and try to make Ruiz out to be a bum which he most definately was not, Ruiz was good enough to beat Holyfield & Rahman far easier than what Lewis did... you twist it to make out that Henry Akinwande was a brilliant fighter yet his title fight with Lewis turned out to be ridiculous....
you claim Lewis was not stripped of all 3 belts yet he retired 3 days before he was due to be stripped of his last remaining belt, so it is immaterial 2 belts or 3 belts, he was still stripped...
you use the term "Old Men" and insinuate that i used that term which is incorrect, only you have used that term to describe Holyfield, Tucker, Spoon & Smith...
Lewis never ever defending the undisputed title is FACT yet you cannot bring yourself to admit it like you cannot supply a link of Moorer saying he did not want to fight Lewis...
You claim Lewis is British yet know he has lived in Canada for 40yrs and his children go to school there, maybe its because if you keep believing him to be British your idolization of him has some kind of legitimacy to it with you also being British...
Holyfield was Shot when he faced Lewis but you twist it claiming he beat Ruiz yet styles make fights and Ruiz won there next 2 fights... Lewis must have thought Ruiz was too much for him otherwise he would have fought him....You giving Bowe the edge over Lewis in my understanding ment you thought Bowe would beat him.. you know say it did not mean that, so maybe you can tell me what you ment by "Giving Bowe the edge.
yes i believe Tunney beat Greb 4-1 with you never showing me anything to change my mind although you seem to believe you had.. you have never provided any evidence on anything to change my mind about anything to do with the sport of boxing..
i have read many times of how Lennox Lewis ducked fighting Roy Jones in 2001 and will stick to my belief, Lewis said in many tabloid newspapers that he had nothing to prove by fighting a middleweight and turned down a staggering $35 million + PPV i showed you several links which proved that to be the case along
http://fighthype.com/pages/content7276.html
Murad Muhammad: "Lennox Lewis accepted $25million to fight Roy Jones Jr".
with several links where Michael Moorer said Lewis turned down fights with him... you ignored those links....
i have never like you claim, "Looked a Fool".. my message box and Green K from members on this subject & Greb vs Tunney subject prove that..
the only fool in either subject was you.. with you always wanting the last word but i will reply to this subject with you till i am 100yrs old without you getting the better of me because i enjoy talking Lennox Lewis as i know all about the guy, he is one fighter who i specialize in..
All that being said, Barnburner is correct. I don't intend to spend the rest of my life arguing with someone whose major personal issues with this topic prevent any rational debate, even if you do. It's time to part ways. I'll even let you have the last word.
Comment