A guy without a jab is the most-skilled fighter of all-time?
Roy Jones Jr top 10 ATG...
Collapse
-
-
you cannot judge a boxer in his prime alone. it should be thru out his career. boxers prove their greatness inside the ring. you cannot say RJJ was so talented he could beat anyone in his best division in his prime. TRUE, but thats not how they make names in boxing. You have to prove it inside the ring. like SRR, Ali, Armstrong etc etc.
Talent wise RJJ could be the most talented and gifted boxer ever. in his prime i wouldnt bet against him. Im pretty sure he can give a good fight against ATG's or even beat them but head to head match up is irrelevant when it comes to ATG's.
RJJ P4P ranked #3 at the worst. resume wise im not sure if he can crack the top 25. but i dont have a lists so dont ask. Talent wise i would put him in the top 5.Comment
-
you cannot judge a boxer in his prime alone. it should be thru out his career. boxers prove their greatness inside the ring. you cannot say RJJ was so talented he could beat anyone in his best division in his prime. TRUE, but thats not how they make names in boxing. You have to prove it inside the ring. like SRR, Ali, Armstrong etc etc.
Talent wise RJJ could be the most talented and gifted boxer ever. in his prime i wouldnt bet against him. Im pretty sure he can give a good fight against ATG's or even beat them but head to head match up is irrelevant when it comes to ATG's.
RJJ P4P ranked #3 at the worst. resume wise im not sure if he can crack the top 25. but i dont have a lists so dont ask. Talent wise i would put him in the top 5.
Jones very arguably was neither the most-skilled fighter of his time (Pernell Whitaker) or the most gifted (Ricardo Lopez). That's two who might very well rank above him in those categories just in his era alone!Comment
-
You are severely under-estimating some of the great names in our sport's history to be discussing Jones as, "talent-wise no worse than #3 all-time."
Jones very arguably was neither the most-skilled fighter of his time (Pernell Whitaker) or the most gifted (Ricardo Lopez). That's two who might very well rank above him in those categories just in his era alone!
ATG 80-100 regionComment
-
yes!
you cannot judge a boxer in his prime alone. it should be thru out his career. boxers prove their greatness inside the ring. you cannot say RJJ was so talented he could beat anyone in his best division in his prime. TRUE, but thats not how they make names in boxing. You have to prove it inside the ring. like SRR, Ali, Armstrong etc etc.
Talent wise RJJ could be the most talented and gifted boxer ever. in his prime i wouldnt bet against him. Im pretty sure he can give a good fight against ATG's or even beat them but head to head match up is irrelevant when it comes to ATG's.
RJJ P4P ranked #3 at the worst. resume wise im not sure if he can crack the top 25. but i dont have a lists so dont ask. Talent wise i would put him in the top 5.
You are severely under-estimating some of the great names in our sport's history to be discussing Jones as, "talent-wise no worse than #3 all-time."
Jones very arguably was neither the most-skilled fighter of his time (Pernell Whitaker) or the most gifted (Ricardo Lopez). That's two who might very well rank above him in those categories just in his era alone!
can i ask you what names are those?
i mean its not like the divisions he campaigned in were very deep at the time he was in them. the top guys who where given a chance to beat him barely won a round. (hoptkins, toney, hill)Comment
-
yes!
lol well jones prime was verrryyy long.
jones was only a shade slower than pernell at 175LBS
can i ask you what names are those?
i mean its not like the divisions he campaigned in were very deep at the time he was in them. the top guys who where given a chance to beat him barely won a round. (hoptkins, toney, hill)Comment
-
-
Comment