Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ranking Hopkins Over Hagler, Can It Be Justified?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ranking Hopkins Over Hagler, Can It Be Justified?

    And does any actually think Hopkins should be ranked higher on a ATG list?

  • #2
    Originally posted by mrboxer
    yes it is justified,haglers only worthy win came against hearns,hopkins would actually dismiss hagler rather quickly within 3 rounds,
    Stop trolling.

    Comment


    • #3
      If hopkins beats pascal am gonna rank him higher than hagler

      Comment


      • #4
        Definitely can be justified just for the simple fact that Hopkins is a mastermind in the ring. If he mad it ugly he definitely could pull it off.

        But no I wouldn't rank him above Hagler unless of course he beat Pascal & Dawson.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Joey Giardello View Post
          If hopkins beats pascal am gonna rank him higher than hagler

          P4p it would be justified doing this, but not at middleweight. Do you not agree?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

            P4p it would be justified doing this, but not at middleweight. Do you not agree?
            I rank hagler higher as a middleweight, but if hopkins beats pascal i rank hopkins better as the over all fighter

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

              P4p it would be justified doing this, but not at middleweight. Do you not agree?





              That's exactly how I see it Jab. Overall career, yes. Middleweight,no.

              Comment


              • #8
                hopkins is better than hagler without pascal.p4p and in mw.both their biggest wins at m.w were against blown up welters,so tito and tommy cancel out.after leonard and oscar their records are pedestrian and pretty much even.i believe hopkins fought the better fighters overall a mw but not by much but hagler should definitely be ehind hopkins

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by r.burgundy View Post
                  hopkins is better than hagler without pascal.p4p and in mw.
                  I would argue that Hagler faced a better level of opposition
                  Originally posted by r.burgundy View Post
                  both their biggest wins at m.w were against blown up welters,.
                  I would argue that Hagler biggest win was over the like of Monroe, Briscoe and maybe Roldan. Hearns hadnt proved anything at mw when he fought Hagler
                  Originally posted by r.burgundy View Post
                  so tito and tommy cancel out.after leonard and oscar their records are pedestrian and pretty much even.
                  Hearns has a better resume that Tito, Duran was a better mw than Oscar
                  Originally posted by r.burgundy View Post
                  i believe hopkins fought the better fighters overall a mw but not by much but hagler should definitely be ehind hopkins
                  Hopkins best wins
                  Tarver
                  the little guys

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Both can only be rated at Middleweight and both are great fighters with Hagler having by far the better resume at 160 so he rates ahead of BHop...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP