Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shavers or Briggs Who Was Better and Who Was Bigger Puncher

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by boxing boy View Post
    Yeah,he was a real bum.

    Won 22 Lost 37 (KO 7)

    What about him?

    Fields was a bum, but at least it was a close fight and not a blow out. Im also not saying Briggs is some great fighter, he isnt at all. Neither one is above average, but no one is talking about how great Briggs is but people talk about how great Shavers is all the time. Thats the point of this thread.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by wmute View Post
      Briggs is by far the hardest puncher in the history of the sport. He ruled for many years one of the toughest HW division we have ever witnessed. That makes him a bonafide ATG.

      Hence if Vitali beats him he has a legit claim to be the GOAT.

      I am sure every person knowledgeable about boxing is secretly or openly agreeing with this statement.

      TS, can you stop ruining the only decent board left with your BS threads?


      Yep think that's what he's looking for lol

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
        i also had Foreman a clear winner against Briggs, i blame referee Larry Hazard Jr. for the corrupt decision in that fight which robbed George of his title...

        Shavers was vastly superior to Briggs in terms of punching-power and quality of opposition.
        Verdict was a shocker and one of those robberies that never gets much print on here.

        Comment


        • #54
          Somebody said earlier in this thread that Briggs hit MUCH harder than Shavers.

          I can see somebody saying he hit harder than Shavers,but MUCH harder?

          Comment


          • #55
            Klitschko fans have to be some of the most pathetic on the board... They build up ****ty opponents better than Bob Arum, and if you don't agree with them, their panties get in a bunch.

            Even Jameel McCline is better than Shannon Briggs and has a win over him.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by GJC View Post
              Verdict was a shocker and one of those robberies that never gets much print on here.
              Shavers also robbed Young in their 2nd fight...so who cares? Quality opposition? 1/2 of shavers opponents either had single digit wins or losing records...how is that quality opposition. Shavers fought more bums than any hw in history.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Wlad Klitschko View Post
                Shavers also robbed Young in their 2nd fight...so who cares? Quality opposition? 1/2 of shavers opponents either had single digit wins or losing records...how is that quality opposition. Shavers fought more bums than any hw in history.

                Now Shavers has fought more bums than any hw IN HISTORY.

                There he goes again.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Wlad Klitschko View Post
                  Shavers also robbed Young in their 2nd fight...so who cares? Quality opposition? 1/2 of shavers opponents either had single digit wins or losing records...how is that quality opposition. Shavers fought more bums than any hw in history.
                  The 2nd fight was such a non event that a draw was more than fair no one deserved to win it. Could say that Young got robbed against Norton, but I guess they all look the same eh?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP