Ezzard Charles vs Manny Pacquiao - Who ranks higher P4P?

[Rolling Stone]

This is in relation to some nerd who said there is no way Charles ranks higher than Manny Pacquiao....vote and explain your decision...

[Schmerzen]

the case ezzard charles is comparable to larry holmes, he was also the follower of a big name - joe louis, thats why the most boxingfans overlooked him back then.
if u go by the 8 traditional divions, and just count beating the lineal champ, how many REAL titles do pacquiao own?
in my book pacquiao is overrated by the media, and floyd would easily expose him.

[Rolling Stone]

the case ezzard charles is comparable to larry holmes, he was also the follower of a big name - joe louis, thats why the most boxingfans overlooked him back then.
if u go by the 8 traditional divions, and just count beating the lineal champ, how many REAL titles do pacquiao own?
in my book pacquiao is overrated by the media, and floyd would easily expose him.

that would only be 2, Flyweight and Featherweight......what people need to realise is there are 5 Championships in 17 weight classes today, compared to when there used to be only 1 champion in 8 weight classes

[Castor_Troy]

that would only be 2, Flyweight and Featherweight......what people need to realise is there are 5 Championships in 17 weight classes today, compared to when there used to be only 1 champion in 8 weight classes

Non lineal but Cotto is not a real champion to you? He's #2 at welter at worse.


Out of the original 8. Pac has won 4 division

112 - Lineal
126 - Lineal
135 - Title claim
147 - Againts Cotto

That's half the total of the original 8. I cant imagine how this doesnt appeal to some people.

[Rolling Stone]

Non lineal but Cotto is not a real champion to you? He's #2 at welter at worse.


Out of the original 8. Pac has won 4 division

112 - Lineal
126 - Lineal
135 - Title claim
147 - Againts Cotto

That's half the total of the original 8. I cant imagine how this doesnt appeal to some people.

you just exposed how much you really know....lets examine this shall we

The Original Weight Divisions are:

Flyweight
Bantamweight
Featherweight
Lightweight
Welterweight
Middleweight
Light Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Manny Pacquiao's Lineal Championships are

Flyweight
Featherweight
Junior Lightweight
Junior Welterweight

Junior lightweight and Junior Welterweight were not apart of the original 8.....

please explain how Pacquiao has half of the original 8......

[Castor_Troy]

that would only be 2, Flyweight and Featherweight......what people need to realise is there are 5 Championships in 17 weight classes today, compared to when there used to be only 1 champion in 8 weight classes

you just exposed how much you really know....lets examine this shall we

The Original Weight Divisions are:

Flyweight
Bantamweight
Featherweight
Lightweight
Welterweight
Middleweight
Light Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Manny Pacquiao's Lineal Championships are

Flyweight
Featherweight
Junior Lightweight
Junior Welterweight

Junior lightweight and Junior Welterweight were not apart of the original 8.....

please explain how Pacquiao has half of the original 8......

You're such a self proclaimed expert whatt****er. esposed for what i know?? lol


Flyweight, Featherweight, Lightweight and Welterweight. that's four right?



the divisions he didnt win. Bantamweight, Middleweight, Lt Heavyweight and Heavyweight.



He has claim at lightweight and Welterweight. Cotto is a legit win. Stop praising yourself.


is that not half of the original eight?

[Castor_Troy]

Manny Pacquiao's Lineal Championships are

Flyweight
Featherweight
Junior Lightweight
Junior Welterweight

Junior lightweight and Junior Welterweight were not apart of the original 8.....

please explain how Pacquiao has half of the original 8......

hahahahaha. i see you have reading problems. I didnt say they were lineal. But he had claims of those divisions which are valid titles.

[Castor_Troy]

Rolling Stone what is your original account? you're obviously an alt. Registered Feb 2010?? wtf?

[DeepSleep]

Not really all that close. Charles's resume is unreal. Let PacMan finish his career than we can discuss where he ranks.

[sonnyboyx2]

Not really all that close. Charles's resume is unreal. Let PacMan finish his career than we can discuss where he ranks.

yes i agree that Ezzard Charles resume is unreal.. yet never have i seen Charles name on anyones ATG top 10 heavyweight list, IMO Charles could cut-it with the very best so it is annoying to not see him included on most lists.. Charles resume is far better than Pacquiao`s resume But he never achieved as much in terms of titles won as did Pacquiao, there is no doubt about it that Pacquiao is a phenominal fighter and worthy of being labelled in the same bracket as Robinson & Armstrong... both Pacquiao & Charles are the stuff that legends are made of..