The Undefeated

[Anthony342]

Thanks. I'm going to bookmark this thread.

[mickey malone]

Thanks. I'm going to bookmark this thread.

Indeed, there's some interesting stuff on here.. Had to giggle at names like, Chuck Mince and Laszlo Szucs.. Who'd have guessed they were on here eh!

[Cardinal Buck]

Renee Cuenca

[BKM-2010]

Ricardo Lopez and Marciano are the most legit imo.

[mickey malone]

Renee Cuenca

I've heard of this guy, Argentinian, was gonna fight Marquez..
45-0 with hardly any ko's.. May still be fighting?

[Anthony342]

If it's okay, I'd like to add the names of some female boxers that have gone undefeated as well:

Laila Ali 24-0, 21 KOs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laila_Ali
Natascha Ragosina 22-0, 13 KOs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natascha_Ragosina
Michelle Aboro 21-0, 12 KOs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Aboro
Jenifer Alcorn 18-0, 11 KOs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenifer_Alcorn
Lucia Rijker 17-0, 14 KOs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucia_Rijker
Giselle Salandy 17-0, 6 KOs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giselle_Salandy

[TBear]

Has anyone ever seen Justin Blevins, Charles Tanner or Shazzon Bradley fight?

I have seen Bradley fight a couple times. I have a couple of his fights somewhere on dvd.

[billeau2]

Wow great thread! good to have a knowleagable poster in the section.

This thread reminds me of a course that used to be taught at St. John's ******* Arts college Annapolis Md. It was a course that described some very intelligent, well thought out theories regarding major leaps of knowledge in history. These theories had one thing in common: they were wrong! But never the less they hardly seemed in any sense epistemologically inferior. Some of them even led to the truth eventually uncovered.

We often see guys (and Anthony's list...women) who are talented and able but the cards they were not in! In the case of women it is often a lack of comp....though Ali's daughter did duck Ann Wolf. But some of the guys off this list may have been the real deal.

[Ben Bolt]

The Ring recently published an article about how important the '0' has become today. Because, an undefeated fighter is the obvious pick to launch for promoters, for TV companies.
But, it can also mean that the fighter has been overprotected.

The article compared today’s situation with that of 50 years ago. Then the '0' didn’t have any significance. If a talented boxer had a couple of losses on his record, it usually meant he had been in there with some tough dudes instead of ducking them, which improved his status.

Though, I like this thread. A lot of work behind it.

[Anthony342]

Do you know what issue of The Ring that is? Like, what month?