This just sums up how backwards and next to impossible the whole modern day "Lineal title" is.
First things first, Floyd lost to his claim to the Lineage in 2007 when he retired. Question is why? Fury keeps his for 3 years but Floyd doesn't? There's no consistency. Some lose it at "retirement" and others don't.
Then when he returned, as you correctly put, there's debate when he got it back. Firstly, the fact there can even be a debate makes no sense to me really but hey ho.
So some said he reclaimed it by beating Mosley, because some say Margarito and Cotto fought for the "New Lineage" even though Paul Williams was #2 when they fought meaning they weren't the universal #1 and #2.
The Ring recognised him as their Champion (not always Lineal but often is which further adds to the confusion) when he fought Guererro because they were #1 and #2.
And then others not until 2015 when Floyd and Pacquaio fought as they were the #1 and #2 at WW (and P4P).
So you got 3 claims by the same fighter across a 5 year span
Then when he retires it get's even worse.
First things first, Floyd lost to his claim to the Lineage in 2007 when he retired. Question is why? Fury keeps his for 3 years but Floyd doesn't? There's no consistency. Some lose it at "retirement" and others don't.
Then when he returned, as you correctly put, there's debate when he got it back. Firstly, the fact there can even be a debate makes no sense to me really but hey ho.
So some said he reclaimed it by beating Mosley, because some say Margarito and Cotto fought for the "New Lineage" even though Paul Williams was #2 when they fought meaning they weren't the universal #1 and #2.
The Ring recognised him as their Champion (not always Lineal but often is which further adds to the confusion) when he fought Guererro because they were #1 and #2.
And then others not until 2015 when Floyd and Pacquaio fought as they were the #1 and #2 at WW (and P4P).
So you got 3 claims by the same fighter across a 5 year span

Comment