Vitali Klitchko's 5 Best Wins?

[elfag]

I'd say Wlad took more risks his entire career. Always took on the best where as Vits took on mostly second tier comp in comparison. Wlad was boring no doubt, but at least he fought the best available fighters.

Thats true wlad took more risk by fighting better fighters... though you could argue vitali fighting lewis was a better fighter than any guys Wlad ever fought except takign on AJ as a 41 year old was very risky.

But I dont blame vitali much, he was out with injuries often and didnt get to get as many big fights or stay as consistent.

I cant say that vitali ever ducked anyone, he was basically not in position to demand top tier fights

[Bronson66]

Thats true wlad took more risk by fighting better fighters... though you could argue vitali fighting lewis was a better fighter than any guys Wlad ever fought except takign on AJ as a 41 year old was very risky.

But I dont blame vitali much, he was out with injuries often and didnt get to get as many big fights or stay as consistent.

I cant say that vitali ever ducked anyone, he was basically not in position to demand top tier fights

He fought Lewis because he was the champion,as champion he was risk averse. there are too many men who were ranked contenders when Vitali was whom he never faced ,to say he didn't duck anyone.

[Dr Z]

Why do you want to just take common opponents? And why did you leave out that Wlad was 2-0 against Byrd while Vits was 0-1?

Ranking fighters H2H is crap. There is nothing objective or factual about it. You can claim a win or a loss for any scenario you want to either lift your own fighter or put down another.

Vits resume is HORRIBLE!! You can try to argue this all you want and I'll keep destroying you. As aan openness I'll ask a question that has already been avoided for a week. Has Vits, as a titlis or highest ranked contender, ever fought the first or second best ring ranked contender after him? You know the answer as do the rest of us. Wlad, the younger more talented and bravery brother took on all the credible opposition of that era while Vits picked and chose his was to the easiest path available. These are facts. Argue agaisnt them if you dare.

And no, Vits isn't even close to being a top 10 ATG heavyweight.

Everyone knows the injury is the reason a well behind Byrd won ... even you.

As I told you both Vitali and Wlad were #1 and #2 for much of the time the two were champions so there was not a lot of room to face the 3rd best man. The answer is in the ranking I provided when the fights happened. Have you ever heard of Peter? Or Adamek? Or Sanders? How about Lewis who dragged his feet and tried to make an otter match then quickly retired when the WBC ordered the re-match??

VK is 8-2 vs top ten ranked opponents that were ring ranked.. And beat many past title holders. This is excellent and few men in heavyweight history were better. I listed them all.


Go ahead and list your top 10 all itme heavyweights. Well see if VK isn' close.


Until then... have fun with the Queeny beat downs.

[Dr Z]

You can repost your nonsense all you want, be that's all it is is nonsense. The onus to rematch is on the loser. I forget, who lost those fights? Oh yeah, Vits lost. Why don't you try to interject Wlad into this again.....that was funny!!

VK offered ring ranked Haye and Valuev mathes for his belt. They said no thanks to matches. And of course Lewis opted to retire rather than give Vitali the re-match he said he would. Nonsense to you, I call them FACTS. You are an inadvertently funny guy, Cowboy.

[JAB5239]

VK offered ring ranked Haye and Valuev mathes for his belt. They said no thanks to matches. And of course Lewis opted to retire rather than give Vitali the re-match he said he would. Nonsense to you, I call them FACTS. You are an inadvertently funny guy, Cowboy.

They didn't say no to the matches, they said no to to never ending slave contracts Vits put in, in case he lost. He always had to have his brother involved when he wasn't sure or didn't win. Vits could never do it on his own.