Originally posted by Anomalocaris
View Post
So you are right about being a better welterweight, but that is common knowledge for just about any fighter who moves up.
Both Leonard and Hearns have a decent chance against Robby. Hearns might strike early and Leonard was great in protracted fights. He was great in Duran 1, he just lost.
Robby can strike fast too. It would be hard for even you to argue Tommy's chin was better than or equal to Robby's. But this fight cannot go the distance. That is surely impossible, i.e., less than 1% likely, is my read. Who strikes best fast may gain an insurmountable edge. It really depends on the approach each man adopts. Do they even know of each other? Do both have equal knowledge of how dangerous the other is? That would determine much of their plans and approach I imagine.
I think Leonard would have an even better chance of pulling off an upset. He might out sugar his namesake. I still think he is the underdog though by about 3 to 2, or the old 60/40 in percentages. This bout might easily end with a decision.
Comment