Bundy always has good posts
Not sure if this would go over any better than any other attempt at category but does anyone know why the shift to gloves is the single categorization in boxing champions?
It is just as ****** comparing Greb to Mayweather as it is Greb to Mendoza or Mendoza to Melankomas.
The ancients having there own category is only my personal success at getting a narrative through fans without them well actuallying every perspective choice to death. That was easy, no one knew enough to challenge anything I said. ****, y'all still don't.
But if you are familiar then jesus christ you're going to argue for comparisons that require more fantasy than fact to even get them in any sort of ring together or make their achievements actually comparable
**** all no one wants to admit there is **** all nothing special about their champion or champions and those jabronis are simply products of their time.
**** all no one talks about how ****ing impossible Greb's career is by the 40s let alone now but don't let that stop you from pointing out Marciano's a CW today.
You guys absolutely know the HW title was a racist propaganda piece but that's not a good reason to be suspect of the entire era's results period.
You guys absolutely know the only time Spain, Italy, and Germany are major players in HW boxing is when fascism is popular in Europe but don't let that stop you from questioning if Joshua could have done well.
**** man, the ****in 90s had 3 belts but it's totes easy to compare to the four belts era. Lennox, the man who invented unterbelts nearly a decade after his last fight, totes knows what it's like to deal with the unterbelt situation.
Besides all that, the **** you guys call sources only flies because its been accepted forever. Damn near daily I remind Bronson Nat Fliescher is not a good source. Pausanias is a quality source. If ol Pau was given the respect his fiction wiriting counterpart is given then youse jamooks would have the ancients on top because there feats are unbelieveable.
Does anyone here believe Theo went 1200-0?
Mel was unpointed against in over a hundred contests?
It isn't the source that's weak for these, it is the belief any man can, could, ever that is hard to gain.
Think about that for a while. You compare ****** things to compare while using fiction to fill the gaps because followership is a direct reflection of leadership. Someone before you was highly regarded for doing the same exact sort of nonsense. Hmm.
Not sure if this would go over any better than any other attempt at category but does anyone know why the shift to gloves is the single categorization in boxing champions?
It is just as ****** comparing Greb to Mayweather as it is Greb to Mendoza or Mendoza to Melankomas.
The ancients having there own category is only my personal success at getting a narrative through fans without them well actuallying every perspective choice to death. That was easy, no one knew enough to challenge anything I said. ****, y'all still don't.
But if you are familiar then jesus christ you're going to argue for comparisons that require more fantasy than fact to even get them in any sort of ring together or make their achievements actually comparable
**** all no one wants to admit there is **** all nothing special about their champion or champions and those jabronis are simply products of their time.
**** all no one talks about how ****ing impossible Greb's career is by the 40s let alone now but don't let that stop you from pointing out Marciano's a CW today.
You guys absolutely know the HW title was a racist propaganda piece but that's not a good reason to be suspect of the entire era's results period.
You guys absolutely know the only time Spain, Italy, and Germany are major players in HW boxing is when fascism is popular in Europe but don't let that stop you from questioning if Joshua could have done well.
**** man, the ****in 90s had 3 belts but it's totes easy to compare to the four belts era. Lennox, the man who invented unterbelts nearly a decade after his last fight, totes knows what it's like to deal with the unterbelt situation.
Besides all that, the **** you guys call sources only flies because its been accepted forever. Damn near daily I remind Bronson Nat Fliescher is not a good source. Pausanias is a quality source. If ol Pau was given the respect his fiction wiriting counterpart is given then youse jamooks would have the ancients on top because there feats are unbelieveable.
Does anyone here believe Theo went 1200-0?
Mel was unpointed against in over a hundred contests?
It isn't the source that's weak for these, it is the belief any man can, could, ever that is hard to gain.
Think about that for a while. You compare ****** things to compare while using fiction to fill the gaps because followership is a direct reflection of leadership. Someone before you was highly regarded for doing the same exact sort of nonsense. Hmm.
Comment