Larry Holmes defence was very underrated.

[QueensburyRules]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;n32254821]

Remind us again which WBA trinket holder held on to their belt long enough to make a fight.

- - As soon as the WBA was won, Tubby Lar who used to be skinny could've told King he wanted that WBA, but Lar askeered he'd get knocked out of his WBC belt, so he ducked over a long career, what, a half dozen WBA Champs?

Indisputable, Watson...

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=QueensburyRules;n32256157]

- - As soon as the WBA was won, Tubby Lar who used to be skinny could've told King he wanted that WBA, but Lar askeered he'd get knocked out of his WBC belt, so he ducked over a long career, what, a half dozen WBA Champs?

Indisputable, Watson...

Who did he duck? A d why haven't you answered my question? Which WBA title holder actually held the belt long enought to unify with?

[Ivich]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;n32256239]

Who did he duck? A d why haven't you answered my question? Which WBA title holder actually held the belt long enought to unify with?

He beat 2 men who held the WBA title at one time.
Smith and Weaver.

Dokes was WBA champ for 9 months.

Coetzee was WBA champ for 1 year 3 months.

Page was WBA champ for 1 year and 4 months.

[Ivich]

[QUOTE=QueensburyRules;n32256157]

- - As soon as the WBA was won, Tubby Lar who used to be skinny could've told King he wanted that WBA, but Lar askeered he'd get knocked out of his WBC belt, so he ducked over a long career, what, a half dozen WBA Champs?

Indisputable, Watson...

Name them.

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=Ivich;n32256261]

He beat 2 men who held the WBA title at one time.
Smith and Weaver.

You're correct. But the fact also is none of the WBA titlests could hold onto their belts long enought to unify with Holmes. 9 titlists during his tenure with a grand total of 3 successful defenses. He just want to discredit Holmes any way he can.

[QueensburyRules]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;n32256239]

Who did he duck? A d why haven't you answered my question? Which WBA title holder actually held the belt long enought to unify with?

- - Pearls before swine regression from U yet again. Boxrec is your friend, but U may need assistance of U minders...

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=QueensburyRules;n32256893]

- - Pearls before swine regression from U yet again. Boxrec is your friend, but U may need assistance of U minders...

No assistance from anyone needed. I know the facts.

[QueensburyRules]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;n32256901]

No assistance from anyone needed. I know the facts.

- - U confusing U runny farts wif facts...priceless...

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=QueensburyRules;n32258179]

- - U confusing U runny farts wif facts...priceless...

And yet you have no answers.....brilliant!!

[Ivich]

[QUOTE=QueensburyRules;n32258179]

- - U confusing U runny farts wif facts...priceless...

Imbecilic. infantile,and typical.