Will Russia dominate boxing in the next decade?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dr. Z
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2020
    • 4527
    • 1,160
    • 1,362
    • 12,768

    #11
    Originally posted by them_apples

    Ukraine is taking a pounding, even the western news is being rather quiet. I was surprised at the responses instantly buying the U.S narrative. Russia is just growing.

    ***** only trades in his own currency, history will tell you nations will thrive economically when this happens - separating themselves from central banking.

    Caesar, Napolean, Hitler - Russia is shaping up fast but we never hear about it lol.

    Remember why Iraq got taken out right? Saddams refusal to trade in USD. low and behold, what resides in Iraq now? a world bank! in a fortress (green zone). look it up!

    look up Caesars assassination, the reasons behind it. This is common history boys.




    uhhh.....russia will produce some serious boxers in the future??


    I got my own theory, the pipeline was one of the reasons ***** was willing to trade in the euro. Once that was destroyed, he sees no reason to not go solo like Napoleon and Caesar (and Hitler, but thats a bad buzzword) Central Banking right now is very angry because the west' leadership is floundering badly. You se Boris ducking in and out of office, he knows he's not the man to face down *****, he's better served drinking ****tails!


    ALSO: I wouldn't call it a stalemate, it's a seige. the Seige of Kyiv (sound familiar?) and it's going terribly for Ukraine and right on track for Russia. I'm not some pro Russian commi, I'm just being realistic here. History is correct.

    The big thing here is Does he stop, he's got a fair claim on all slavic lands.

    You make some solid points on a man I despise.

    Comment

    • them_apples
      Lord
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 9795
      • 1,185
      • 900
      • 41,722

      #12
      Originally posted by Dr. Z


      You make some solid points on a man I despise.
      Its not like he’s my buddy, I just can’t delude myself. Its embarassing

      Comment

      • QueensburyRules
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2018
        • 21846
        • 2,360
        • 17
        • 187,708

        #13
        - - OP must not have kept up with the casualty rated of Russian men of fighting age.

        Gonna be old men in the ring for Russia.

        Comment

        • Dr. Z
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2020
          • 4527
          • 1,160
          • 1,362
          • 12,768

          #14
          Originally posted by QueensburyRules
          - - OP must not have kept up with the casualty rated of Russian men of fighting age.

          Gonna be old men in the ring for Russia.
          The are using mercenaries from other lands too.

          Comment

          • Willie Pep 229
            hic sunt dracone
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2020
            • 6365
            • 2,824
            • 2,773
            • 29,169

            #15
            The Russian crude birthrate is 11 per 1000 making it one of the lowest birth rates in the world. It sits in the bottom third with only third-world countries below it.*

            It has been in decline since the 1990s (suffering a negative growth between 2003 and 2010) and now holds a climbing median age of 40 while the U.S.A. median age is 38. (And yes the US holds a low birthrate as well, 12 per 1000.)

            India's crude birthrate is 18 per 1000. Remembering that figure needs to be extrapolated exponentially.

            If you factor in the loss of Russian youth from this current war, it's seems Russia's role in producing the next generation of great fighters is quite unlikely. Their numbers are disminishing.

            The worldwide median age is 30.

            * Except China where the rate was squashed by legislation. (10.5 per 1000.)

            Comment

            • Dr. Z
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2020
              • 4527
              • 1,160
              • 1,362
              • 12,768

              #16
              India is perhaps the least athletic nation relative to the size of it poplutaion. Look at the Olympics history. In boxing the nation seldom produces any heavyweight boxers that turn pro, let alone any top 20 ranked heavyweights.

              Both the Russia and China have declining birthrates.

              Comment

              • them_apples
                Lord
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2007
                • 9795
                • 1,185
                • 900
                • 41,722

                #17
                Originally posted by QueensburyRules
                - - OP must not have kept up with the casualty rated of Russian men of fighting age.

                Gonna be old men in the ring for Russia.
                not if they serve for a few years and join the ranks of boxing afterwards. Whats so difficult of that to suspect? How backwards do you think russia is? Just massacring all its man power like its ww2? Implementing communism was in its early stages in world war 2, communism is a breeding strategy to simplify it for you, its brilliant and sick at the same time. Stalin, purposely was killing off his own soldiers to speed up the breeding process (russia has always had the power to tell its women to bear children, its all apart of the russian steamroller.) right now, a decree and benefits program is out in russia for women to bear children. Russia has had to rapidly repopulate before (As far back as the mongols they were having populations decimated). Theres a reason Stalin is described to “think in decades”. A genius but absolute damaged sick man, certainly the worst of europe, far worse than Hitler as an individual if going by modern catholic influenced morals.

                sounds messed up, but 3rd and 4th gen communism is a population of well bred obedient AND happy citizens (as far as a citizen goes). The police don’t even need to carry guns half the time. It still might not sound cool, but from an economic standpoint it is, its one man controlling an obedient population, with his own currency (a la caesar and his coin).

                should be interesting to watch us get smacked around. Hopefully no nukes go off, I doubt it.
                Last edited by them_apples; 02-12-2023, 06:05 PM.

                Comment

                • Willie Pep 229
                  hic sunt dracone
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2020
                  • 6365
                  • 2,824
                  • 2,773
                  • 29,169

                  #18
                  Originally posted by them_apples

                  not if they serve for a few years and join the ranks of boxing afterwards. Whats so difficult of that to suspect? How backwards do you think russia is? Just massacring all its man power like its ww2? Implementing communism was in its early stages in world war 2, communism is a breeding strategy to simplify it for you, its brilliant and sick at the same time. Stalin, purposely was killing off his own soldiers to speed up the breeding process (russia has always had the power to tell its women to bear children, its all apart of the russian steamroller.) right now, a decree and benefits program is out in russia for women to bear children. Russia has had to rapidly repopulate before (As far back as the mongols they were having populations decimated). Theres a reason Stalin is described to âthink in decadesâ. A genius but absolute damaged sick man, certainly the worst of europe, far worse than Hitler as an individual if going by modern catholic influenced morals.

                  sounds messed up, but 3rd and 4th gen communism is a population of well bred obedient AND happy citizens (as far as a citizen goes). The police don¢t even need to carry guns half the time. It still might not sound cool, but from an economic standpoint it is, its one man controlling an obedient population, with his own currency (a la caesar and his coin).

                  should be interesting to watch us get smacked around. Hopefully no nukes go off, I doubt it.
                  You think Russia can smack us around?

                  Comment

                  • kara
                    Master of Disaster
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 3267
                    • 1,308
                    • 277
                    • 8,425

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Willie Pep 229

                    You think Russia can smack us around?
                    Not on the battlefield they can't

                    Comment

                    • them_apples
                      Lord
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 9795
                      • 1,185
                      • 900
                      • 41,722

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Willie Pep 229

                      You think Russia can smack us around?
                      us as in the west.

                      specifically not the USA because they will opt out of the engagement with russia and focus more on china. Not sure who wins that, or what type of engagement it would even be. Not all battles are: heres all my best **** vs yours. Even in the roman times battlefield strategy was still about focusing all your power on one small point of the enemies. Numbers, tech, battlefield objectives, terrain and economics all play roles. The fantasy of what a war with china or russia looks like to the average us or can citizen is very far fetched. The usa was totally unprepared for war. Its easy to see

                      germany is reluctant to give ukraine tanks because it is desperately restructuring for war and it knows this time the usa will be occupied with china, not japan. Thats some series mustard to content with. China at least has little experience in assaulting, it is a defensive creeping nation that dominates trade. The usa has shown some steve jobs type ramshackle cunning war tactics, thats our one good thing we got going.

                      when you hear about battlefield victories within whichever history you are being given, the victors are almost always talking about a situation where the winner had a strategic advantage, overwhelming local superiority or vice versa. And many other intangibles because men are mortal, and hunger/sleep plagues us.

                      when people talk about wars with russia and china, defeat would come economically, and politically. Russia and china both have a better current government than we do. We are split and damaged, fighting amongst eachother like the khans did. Such is the cycle. Europe is old and has history however, Im sure germany will rear its head in some way out of all this. And the usa is gonna go through some serious politics if war breaks out, if it wants to stay relevant, that is. We cant count ourselves out I suppose, but ****s got to get bad before it gets good.
                      Last edited by them_apples; 02-14-2023, 11:46 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP